Skip to comments.
In-House Wars: For at least one, the goal was to drive people away.
Admin Moderator
| 8-2-02
| Admin Moderator
Posted on 08/03/2002 10:16:57 AM PDT by justshe
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 401-411 next last
To: hellinahandcart; maxwell; .30Carbine
This one seems specifically appropriate to this thread: God hath given you one face and you make yourselves another.
Good site...thanks for posting it maxwell.
261
posted on
08/04/2002 1:07:19 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: FreedominJesusChrist
THIS is how it is done, FYI.
We'll really miss ya.
To: .30Carbine; Lazamataz
Laz, thou dankish unchin-snouted flirt-gill...
263
posted on
08/04/2002 1:09:42 PM PDT
by
maxwell
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Well, what I find hypocritical is that many of you people on the JW threads knew that ned was a multiple-screename liberal disruptor, but yet you guys said nothing when he sat there and shamelessly bashed Larry Klayman.I repeat, I thought everyone knew ned had more than one screen name.
I did not know, and am not yet convinced, that he was a liberal disruptor.
If you'll recall, there were more people bashing Larry Klayman on those threads than there were defending him.
264
posted on
08/04/2002 1:10:19 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: justshe
.thanks for posting it maxwell.Uh, I didn't post it, it must've been Errant_Tickle-brained_Apple-john. Not that I would know anything about HIM.
265
posted on
08/04/2002 1:10:58 PM PDT
by
maxwell
To: maxwell; Lazamataz
Hey! I was just gonna ping him. Laz, show thy sheep-biting face, and be hanged an hour!
To: justshe
I found this site sometime in the summer of 2000 just before the election. I was pretty impressed and gave the site to several other people. During the Florida recount I got more news here than anywhere else. I have donated two times to keep the site goint.
Having said all that let me say that I am more than a little frustrated in the last 6 months to a year here. I am a Bush supporter and make no mistake. While open to conservatives who may have some frustration with him, I am turned off by the constant bashing of Bush by many here. What I am not sure of is how much of that represents real Freepers and how much represents the disrupters. It makes a difference to me, because I do not feel much of anything in common with folks who intend to take a hike the next election because Bush is not conservative enough for them and who feel the need to bash him as much as what goes on here. So I am frustrated and will probably continue to monitor but don't really feel like contributing to keep going at this point.
I might also add that most of the people that I turned onto this site have turned off to it because they see things as a bit radical for them.
I'm looking for a group that while their might be some disagreement on how to proceed still keeps in mind that winning is also important. That because I may not be as far right as them does not make me some left wing loony or a RINO. A term that while worthwhile is certainly misused by some folks here.
Is this the place for me? Right now I am not sure. This topic will probably keep me around a bit longer, but my feeling is that it is not the forum it was when I managed to stumble on it in mid 2000.
267
posted on
08/04/2002 1:16:24 PM PDT
by
billva
To: dighton; justshe; carlo3b
Will a fine be levied? EGADS....I DO get myself in dill pickles! I honestly had NO idea....LOL. No fine as long as it's used correctly. However, I notice you're using carlo3b's former screen name. He may be entitled to royalties.
Perhaps I could 'rent' it from jellybean once in awhile?
No need to rent it...it's usage is free. I do ask that you submit your request, with the sentence containing the word highlighted, at least 3 days prior to usage. This will ensure that that the high standard I've set for it's usage will be maintained.
To: maxwell
Do you want to reply to billva, or shall I? Hmm?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I suppose that those of you who "won't be voting for Bush in the next election because he isn't a REAL CONSERVATIVE" would have thought ned was a liberal.
270
posted on
08/04/2002 1:23:07 PM PDT
by
Amelia
To: FreedominJesusChrist; Amelia
I didn't know.
Looking back, I don't necessarily believe he/she was a liberal disruptor.
I think the posts were designed to make us look at ourselves.
Whether Larry Klayman, Alan Keyes, or GWB. I honestly believe he/she was trying to make us see how ridiculous it was to worship another human.
Face it, the JW threads would have gone no better and no worse had "ned" not contributed. His posts on those threads were few and very short. None were attacking and most were done with humor.
You have a very thin skin where Larry is concerned.
Even the most ardent Bush-bots can find one or two items to disagree with the President on, (CFR, immigration, farm bill, etc.). Even while we continue to support him overall.
With you, the full set of blinders is on when it comes to JW.
271
posted on
08/04/2002 1:23:15 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: OneidaM; FreedominJesusChrist
AHHH yes..rdf..another one liner opus.....well..cya. You can't leave that way. You need to put up an opus thread FIJC.
To: .30Carbine
[Thine] breath stinks with eating toasted cheese! Oh ya, well... Thou paunchy spur-galled clack-dish!
To: Amelia
Funny isn't it...I thought one of the most common traits of a liberal is their undying support of another, regardless of how ridiculous, ie Clinton.
Most here that support GWB can at least disagree with some of his policies. Be it Israel, education, whatever. The Klayman supporters are doing the Clinton worship. Absolutely no room for any question as to whether a specific lawsuit might be frivilous or designed for maximum impact regardless of merit.
Makes you wonder who's really trying to use the divide and conquer agenda hmmm?
274
posted on
08/04/2002 1:26:53 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: billva; .30Carbine
O lilliterate loiterer!
275
posted on
08/04/2002 1:28:16 PM PDT
by
maxwell
To: dubyaismypresident
Nice to see you again, thou bawdy common-kissing wagtail!
To: maxwell
You made that one up
...didn't you?
A+
To: .30Carbine
Nice to see you again, thou bawdy common-kissing wagtail!
Back at you, Thou beslubbering fool-born strumpet!
To: billva
There are more of the types of folks you seek than you think. The moderator said it best: "And the other option is to let them win by letting them drive you away- with you being people from every single conservative faction we have. Rest assured though, if that one happens, if you make another home and it starts being successful, they will come there and do it to you there."
Hope you stick around.
279
posted on
08/04/2002 1:30:51 PM PDT
by
justshe
To: jellybean
Wow.....and I've had this nick since.....1999, I think. NOT my first choice for a nick...so I had to make due.
280
posted on
08/04/2002 1:32:09 PM PDT
by
justshe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260, 261-280, 281-300 ... 401-411 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson