Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Friendly Fire (Book: U.S. Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize U.S. Cities to Provoke War With Cuba)
ABCnews.com ^ | 1 May 2002 | David Ruppe

Posted on 08/02/2002 4:46:47 PM PDT by Moose4

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last
My apologies if this has already been posted here--I searched and didn't find it. I got this linked off another board I hang out on and found it...I don't know, interesting? Disturbing?

}:-)4

1 posted on 08/02/2002 4:46:48 PM PDT by Moose4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Moose4
He needs more precious bodily fluids.
I'm gonna take a shower, call me when the cheese is about ready.
2 posted on 08/02/2002 4:50:40 PM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
"The scary thing is none of this stuff comes out until 40 years after," says Bamford.

... so next year we'll find out who killed JFK...
3 posted on 08/02/2002 4:52:15 PM PDT by Lexington Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
Hmm...ya wonder if JFK was killed to STOP stuff like this?
4 posted on 08/02/2002 4:54:14 PM PDT by FreeperinRATcage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
Maybe JFK (known as a wothless no good Son of a) was killed to end this diobolical scheme.
5 posted on 08/02/2002 4:58:53 PM PDT by Lewite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FreeperinRATcage
Maybe they wanted this to go forward and he stood in the way...who knows? All I can say is, damn. Just...damn.
6 posted on 08/02/2002 5:01:10 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
There were reports U.S. military leaders had encouraged their subordinates to vote conservative during the election.

An unusual item set amidst all of this planned treason. How is this on a par with conspiring to kill US citizens?

7 posted on 08/02/2002 5:04:01 PM PDT by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Moose4
well if its printed in a book then it must be true. /sarcasm.

this reminds me of those news reports a while back about the massacre during the Korean war. ABC news even took the guy who revealed it back to Korea, where he could tearfully recount the event. The reporters who broke the story won prizes/awards for the story.

That story was true too. /sarcasm

9 posted on 08/02/2002 5:18:10 PM PDT by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
It is interesting, and it is disturbing. But note that these were plans, which went nowhere. That type of mindset exists in every security service - lets make mayhem to show our worldview is right - and it is up to the authorities to squash it.
10 posted on 08/02/2002 5:24:26 PM PDT by BlackVeil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lewite
Or because he wouldn't go ahead with it, corrupt though he was....
11 posted on 08/02/2002 5:25:54 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Raw meat for the crazy people here.
12 posted on 08/02/2002 5:28:30 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
"Although no one in Congress could have known at the time," he writes, "Lemnitzer and the Joint Chiefs had quietly slipped over the edge."

Typical radical leftist BS of the day: as if the joint chiefs weren't specifically asked to come up with a plan and asked to "think outside the box". Considering the stuff the Kennedy gang did on their own to try to kill Castro, I believe they would have gone ahead with the plan if they thought they could get away with it...

The radical left later used the same "blame it on the military" to justify their change in course in Vietnam. Clark Clifford was "shocked, shocked" to learn "the military had no plan for how we were going to win the war" --- when in fact it was the President's responsibility to have such a plan rather than some flunky in the Pentagon.

I suspect the real objective of this book is not to expose history but to undermine the Bush administration's steps to protect the country from attack by enemy elements already here...

13 posted on 08/02/2002 5:37:10 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
It isn't. The author simply wants to make sure you associate the concept of "military take over" with the "right wing" (i.e., Republican Party").
14 posted on 08/02/2002 5:39:35 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sci Fi Guy
The military are asked to have contingency plans of all sorts. Wouldn't surprise me that 1) such plans were prepared, 2) there were also plans for invading England and, oh, I dunno, repelling an invasion from Mars.
15 posted on 08/02/2002 5:48:39 PM PDT by sailor4321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sailor4321
The military are asked to have contingency plans of all sorts. Wouldn't surprise me that 1) such plans were prepared, 2) there were also plans for invading England and, oh, I dunno, repelling an invasion from Mars.

Exactly, so this is nothing.

The reason that we fought so well during the Persian Gulf war was because we had a plan repelling the Soviet invasion in the middle east.

All we had to do was to put the troops in place, and win the war decisively.

16 posted on 08/02/2002 5:53:02 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
Interesting timing on the release of this news....with probable military action in Iraq in the not to distant future and an upcoming election. The Dems are pulling out all the stops to defeat the Republicans.

Sad part is...plenty of Americans will buy into it.

17 posted on 08/02/2002 5:53:47 PM PDT by Icthus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Icthus
Sad part is...plenty of Americans will buy into it.

Most Americans do not even vote. So there's some hope.

18 posted on 08/02/2002 5:58:18 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sailor4321
Gee look who this guy Bamford worked for:

James Bamford

BIO

James Bamford is the author of THE PUZZLE PALACE, a national bestseller when it was first published and now regarded as a classic. He was until recently Washington Investigative Producer for ABC's World News Tonight with Peter Jennings and has written investigative cover stories for the New York Times Magazine, the Washington Post Magazine, and the Los Angeles Times Magazine.

http://www.bookreporter.com/authors/au-bamford-james.asp

19 posted on 08/02/2002 5:58:23 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Moose4
IMHO, this guy's a nut.

From Jpost.com In several tendentious asides, Bamford tells his readers that Israel has received $100 billion or more in US aid since 1967, and that Ariel Sharon "set off the bloodiest upheaval between Israeli forces and Palestinians in a generation, which resulted in a collapse of the seven-year peace process... " He also accuses Israel of "extensive war crimes."

20 posted on 08/02/2002 5:59:09 PM PDT by Isle of sanity in CA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson