Posted on 08/01/2002 7:58:35 AM PDT by rface
Edited on 05/11/2004 5:33:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
"False" only in the sense that it was a misidentification - we certainly don't know from this story whether she did so intentionally or maliciously.
Would you really have her be personally liable?
As for the system, what would have had them do differently to avoid this outcome?
Individually, none. Generally, they organized a government which deprived him of his liberty without good reason.
I know it's a tough question. Here we have an innocent man who spent, what, 18 years in prison for a crime he didn't commit. But, we also know that the justice system is imperfect and cannot be perfected. How can we make this man whole again?
In any case, what would be the best outcome for me is compensating this man for his losses without simultaneously punishing people for doing exactly what we expect them to do in exactly the manner in which we expect them to do it.
I would like to know more about the rape charge that he was acquitted on. It occurred prior to this one and just after his parole from prison on the first rape charge.
Johnson had been in trouble before. He is a former Marine paroled in June 1982 after serving about half of a 15-year sentence given him after a 1974 court-martial on another rape charge. In that case, he was convicted of rape, robbery and assault of the wife of a Marine staff sergeant while stationed in Japan.
On Nov. 28, 1982, Johnson was arrested and charged with kidnapping and raping a 22-year-old woman near Maffit Avenue and Sarah Street. He was acquitted in 1983.
The circumstances surrounding his acquittal would be helpful.
Could it be that he wrongly found guilty twice? Nope. Is it likely that he committed the first rape, but not the second? Nope. So, where do we go from here?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.