Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Andrew Sullivan: The Camille Paglia IMterview (part 1)
andrewsullivan.com ^ | 07/31/2002 | Andrew Sullivan

Posted on 07/31/2002 2:18:26 PM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: Dales
Your last paragraph sums it up well:
When we find ourselves cheering James Trafficant merely because every so often he gave a one minute speech we agreed with while he took bribes and kickbacks, we sell out our principles and our integrity.

Thanks for this great commentary.

21 posted on 07/31/2002 4:11:27 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dales
Ya done good, pard. Nice rant (and right on).
22 posted on 07/31/2002 5:40:47 PM PDT by logos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dales
 There is no middle ground, I am on an island
with very few other inhabitants.

I felt a pang of recognition as a conservative-side
libertarian.  Until I read you profile page.
I'll be pushing off for the next island, now.
Cheers.

23 posted on 07/31/2002 6:03:54 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
You oppose repealing the amendment that gave us an income tax? Or the one that gave us popularly elected Senators?

Or you aren't pro-life? (If it is that one, that strikes me as odd since I put that in the post)

Or do you just hate Pittsburgh?

There isn't much in my profile other than that. (Or if you are confusing me with nutball freeper H.Akston, then you have stumbled across one reason I changed names back)

24 posted on 07/31/2002 6:09:36 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I have long described myself as a libertarian leaning conservative. That is an intentionally ambiguous phrase. Am I a libertarian, leaning conservative, or a conservative who is libertarian leaning? My mere existence on Free Republic has been minimized due to an unbelievable polarization of these groups. There is no middle ground, I am on an island with very few other inhabitants.

I know what you mean. The problem is, if you're a sorta-Libertarian then there's a danger of being perceived as a "moderate" and Rush Limbaugh, quite rightly, bashes them.

I think all drugs should be legal, etc. etc.....I agree with many Libertarian things, I think people would be well advised to think carefully about most everything (except some of the foreign policy stuff) the Cato Institute says.

But I'd never DREAM of throwing away my vote by actually voting Libertarian. And there really is a serious "raving loon" problem with the Libertarians, too, that needs to be addressed. And I have huge problems with Libertarian isolationist foreign policy.

I sorta consider myself a "PJ O'Rourke" Republican. He has a lot of Libertarian leanings himself, but really isn't one.

25 posted on 07/31/2002 6:12:52 PM PDT by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I do not believe public institutions are the place for religion. Sunday schools and churches are there to fill that function. Maybe, in these days of manifold political permutations, the phrase 'no man is an island' breaks down at the affiliative level.
26 posted on 07/31/2002 6:18:51 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: John H K
I hear ya, although when it comes to certain drugs I fall off that bandwagon. I know someone (very close to me) who became a crack addict and he swears that he was hooked after the very first time he tried. My beliefs about the foolishness of the drug war are very strained when I think about the drugs that are that unforgiving to mistakes in judgement.
27 posted on 07/31/2002 6:20:00 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
I completely understand your point. Mine wording may be weak, but the intent is more aimed at preventing the imposition of militant atheism as a defacto state religion than anything else.

Our founding fathers did not hide the fact that they were religious, and did not hesitate to reflect that in their public roles. To my eyes, this is how it should be. Representatives from religious areas should be allowed to reflect that in their lives and vocations, just as representatives from areas that are more secular should be allowed to not. Nothing more, nothing less. Not the imposition of a religous state, nor the imposition of an atheist state. Jesus' realm is not Caesers'.

But more importantly, the fact that we differ in that regard should never turn me from people like you as allies, nor people like you from me. If either happens, then this is the exact problem that that particular wording (poorly constructed as it is) was aimed at trying to prevent.

Regards

28 posted on 07/31/2002 6:28:22 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

Mine=My. The beer at Billy's Roadhouse is the culprit, I swear. :-)
29 posted on 07/31/2002 6:29:38 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dales
The beer aside...excellent post as usual toots!!!!
30 posted on 07/31/2002 6:31:04 PM PDT by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Dales
From your take on the WOD,
abortion, and religion in government,
I'd say you are a libertarian-leaning
conservative, making me a
conservative-leaning libertarian.
I can live with that. :)
31 posted on 07/31/2002 6:32:41 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dales
"There is no middle ground, I am on an island with very few other inhabitants."

Actually, if you look around, you'd probably discover you are in the majority.

Observe that the libertarian-conservative flame wars usually involve only a few, though prolifically verbose, participants. Those threads are best ignored -- full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

32 posted on 07/31/2002 6:40:55 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Would it be safe to say that both libertarian-leaning conservatives and conservative-leaning libertarians should be able to find common ground by agreeing that the WOD as now waged is insane, and that the federal government should never, ever spend one dime promoting abortion?
33 posted on 07/31/2002 6:40:59 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I would run that up the pole, salute it, take pictures,
and make a T-shirt. ;)
34 posted on 07/31/2002 6:44:43 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wish she didn't spoil it by liking Nader.
35 posted on 07/31/2002 6:48:51 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Then we can coexist on Freeper Island :-)

This is what I don't get. There is common ground. Lots of it. I again challenge anyone who is either a conservative or a libertarian to go to the RLC forum on this site and read the position paper that is posted there. What isn't there to like in what is in it? The most severe controversies between conservatives and libertarians isn't in it. It is what we have in common, and what we should be fighting for together!

36 posted on 07/31/2002 6:50:08 PM PDT by Dales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dales
I have been there and read it. My voting habit has been to vote Republican at the top of the ticket (Pres, VP) and
libertarian the rest of the way down. We need people in local office proving their worth, I think, before anyone will trust a libertarian at higher levels.
37 posted on 07/31/2002 6:53:56 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"CP: I'm still a Nader fan. His critiques of capitalism can save it. "

That is the funniest damn thing I've read in a while. For a woman that invokes Stalinism at the drop of a hat as a curse on her enemies, it seems profoundly ironic to praise this socialist greenie-weenie par excellence.

If she is a Libertarian, then I am a potted plant.
38 posted on 07/31/2002 7:09:57 PM PDT by Lizard_King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I wouldn't waste two seconds listening to that unctuous socialite, George Stephanopolous, or Paul Begala, a yapping mongoose with the ethical sense of a stone.

I enjoy reading everything she writes. Thanks for posting this. (I would appreciate it if you could add me to your Sullivan list.)

39 posted on 07/31/2002 7:14:29 PM PDT by Dr. Scarpetta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Coalition?

40 posted on 07/31/2002 7:29:13 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson