Skip to comments.
Big Sleazy Sobers Up
National Review ^
| 7-31-02
Posted on 07/31/2002 1:25:37 PM PDT by mikenola
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Plummz
A group of disgruntled blacks led by the likes of some Rev'rund I can't recall.
21
posted on
07/31/2002 8:48:53 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: gcruse
I suspect the guy is really a Republican, and ran as a Democrat just to get votes. "Republican" is a dirty word among many blacks, and it seems, despite many conservative ideals, middle class blacks continue to cling to the Democratic party. This guy got into office because of all the middle class blacks who live in New Orleans.
There was a living wage initiative pending during the election. Nagin was the only candidate to actually voice opposition to it.
22
posted on
08/01/2002 8:02:46 AM PDT
by
geaux
To: geaux
What you say makes a lot of sense.
23
posted on
08/01/2002 12:12:55 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: dead
Unfortunately I have seen this a few moths too late. Youre completely wrong with your deceptive statements. For it is never too late for the truth, I tell you now what really had happened:
1.: The cop who was killed was not her partner. He was just another NOPD officer.
2.: She had definitive not killed him. He was killed by a young man called Rogers LaCaze.
3.: There were not five, but two workers killed. She had executed them because Lacaze had forced her to do it. Rogers handed her the gun he'd shot the officer with, and pressed the dead officer's pistol against her head. If she hadn't shot the two young Vietnamese, LaCaze would have killed her.
4.: The restaurant was not Chinese, but Vietnamese.
5.: The girl in the freezer did not identify her as the shooter. According to the trial records, Chau heard more gunfire but was unable to see who was shooting.
Surely you never met Antoinette Frank in person. Probably you got your information from hearsay or gutter press. It is so easy to malign people who cant fight back. Keep that in mind.
To: alnick
You are mistaken. There was no evidence whose bones they found. They just had supposed that it could be eventually the bones of Antoinette Frank's missing father but also the bones could belong to anybody else.
To: Doctor Oliver
Oh, I had to think back to remember posting that. It's been a while. :-) Thanks for the refresher.
26
posted on
03/17/2003 12:34:03 PM PST
by
alnick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson