Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Committee Votes for UN 'Women's Rights' Treaty
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 7/30/02 | Jeff Johnson

Posted on 07/30/2002 10:34:07 AM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: justshe; 88keys
Okay, I did a little digging, and it is true: As long as Bush "unsigns" the treaty before the full Senate votes on it, it's ZESTfully dead, and any action the Senate takes is irrelevant. For plenty of proof, just go to Google and plug in "Bush CEDAW treaty unsign".

And again, I fully believe there's no way 2/3 of the Senate would vote to ratify anyway. You'd need every single RAT plus 16 truly left-wing Republicans, of which there are only two or three IMHO. (There are a lot of RINOs, but RINOs aren't nearly as bad as true leftists.)

Of course, it's also completely unconstitutional. The treaty would require the US to violate states' rights, destroy the First Amendment, force the US to report to the UN on how well we were implenting the treaty's demands (total violation os US soverignty), etc. If it did pass, some group would get a judge to issue an injunction, and it would spend a few years bouncing around the federal courts until the SCOTUS completely slam-dunked it 9-0.

Oh, one more thing: No matter what treaties, UN or otherwise, we may or may not ratify, the simple reality is that if the president wants to withdraw from one or simply ignore it, he can do so and nobody can stop him. This is just what Bush did with the START II treaty. He simply said "we're withdrawing," and that was the end of it.
41 posted on 07/31/2002 6:32:44 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Thanks! Appreciate your research!

(checking one 'worry' off my list)
42 posted on 07/31/2002 8:40:19 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dpwiener
No, the treaty will not go to the President, and there is no opportunity for a veto. It was signed by a previous President, and will go into effect if it is ratified by a 2/3 vote of the Senate.

Thanks for the correction. But see the posts below. There is still room for the Executive to act here.

I am not so sure about the Senate. I hope either the Senate shows nerve, or, if it seems likely not to, the President steps up to the plate.

Best to you,

Richard F.

43 posted on 07/31/2002 9:29:16 PM PDT by rdf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rdf
I am quitting FR.

Ask the management if you want to know why.

Farewell,

Richard F.

44 posted on 08/01/2002 2:07:02 PM PDT by rdf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rdf
Here is one last thing, for America and the common good.

Dear Colleague,

On Monday we will have an urgent action alert related to today's Friday
Fax. There is concern in the US Senate that CEDAW may be approaching
ratification. Pro-CEDAW forces are very organized.

I want to point out that the Friday Fax is written not by me but by
Douglas A. Sylva who is C-FAM's Director of Research. He has been writing
it for over a year and I do not know what we would do without him. Doug is
in the current issue of National Review Online with an article on AIDS.

Spread the word.

Yours sincerely,

Austin Ruse
President

Goodbye!

Richard F.

45 posted on 08/01/2002 2:15:10 PM PDT by rdf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson