Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2nd Bug Expert Bolsters Westerfield Defense: (Dusek Melting Down Before Juries Eyes!!)
NBC/San Diego ^ | July 22, 2002 | NBC/San Diego

Posted on 07/22/2002 3:02:31 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,621-1,635 next last
To: CAPPSMADNESS
The hair issue is another strange thing. Before abducting Danielle, in DW's drunken stupor, did he think to put on a Ruth-Buzzy hair net thingy (he just happened to have)? He had no hair fall on Danielle's comforter or anywhere in her room or their house? Also, how did he know the alarm wasn't set and a door was unlocked?
481 posted on 07/22/2002 8:01:07 PM PDT by Lanza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 463 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Poobah is nothing more than a blind apologist for tyrannical government officials.
482 posted on 07/22/2002 8:02:25 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Lanza
And they had a dog. A dog that doesn't bark, but makes a lot of wee-wees in the house.
483 posted on 07/22/2002 8:02:58 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: gigi
The CTV reporter Beth, today said that the jurors are stoic, that she can't see any reaction to the testominy other that jurors taking notes.

My guess is that this is the truthful observation. I really doubt Judge Mudd would tolerate a lot of overt emotion and jurors making noticeable eye contact, etc.

I think Rick and Little River just want to ride the VD Gravy Train. It's much more interesting to make up a visual of how the jurors are reacting than to simply say they are not at all.

Sounds like a while lot of show biz and very little accuracy.

484 posted on 07/22/2002 8:03:16 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: Lanza
Before the trial went on recess for 11 days, the CTV reporter commented that the jury was paying close attention and taking notes during Faulkner's testimony. Did anyone else hear her say that?

I remember that, and I believe it was said by those watching TV (CTV,KOGO,KGTV,?) that the talking head was making a big deal out of that fact.

485 posted on 07/22/2002 8:03:52 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Anybody got a take on what happened at the end today with Tomsovic? Bunch of discussion about a trail and then on the last followup before the sidebar several questions about the position of the body (legs, arms and laying in a northerly direction). Not sure where this was going, although I don't think Dusek objected...
486 posted on 07/22/2002 8:05:19 PM PDT by clearvision
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: demsux
I suspect some "similarities" with the Samantha case.

This is an interesting bit of speculation. The prospects are very intriguing. If there are some things that have surfaced from the Runnion case and since Mudd has already given his direction and interpretation to the jury that there is no connection, then some including Judge Mudd may be in deep doo doo and it could end up with Westerfield owning a considerable chunk of California after the civil suit dust settles. :)
487 posted on 07/22/2002 8:05:43 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Both the national office and the San Diego chapter said they did not have Westerfield listed as a member.

I tried to tell em. TOO LATE. You provided proof that it was another MEDIA HYPE. The public (sheeple to the media) like to HATE SMART PEOPLE.

488 posted on 07/22/2002 8:05:51 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: Henrietta
This is not a criticism of you, but attorneys ARE NOT 'officers of the court'. I can locate the USSC opinion that confirms this if you want proof. I had a run-in with a deputy court clerk over this issue a year ago and when I threatened her with a civil rights action and obstruction of justice charge, a judge quickly straightened her out on the matter. I don't take B.S. from arrogant court personnel.
489 posted on 07/22/2002 8:08:08 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
If there was his DNA on her neckless his goose is cooked!

FALSE.

490 posted on 07/22/2002 8:09:58 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
It was mentioned to me that Danielle had fibers on her body that were consistant with those in the RV.

I believe I mentioned fibers to you earlier today.

First, a disclaimer. The most a witness can say about fibers are that they are similar and could (not *did* as there is no DNA, for instance) come from the same source. Then the witnesses describe the examination done on the fibers and how they are similar, if they are. This includes microscopic evaluations and the like.

Also, the source of some of the fibers has not been determined. The one fiber witness stated the fibers (orange) were like those found in a blanket.

What was found: Westerfield was in the midst of massive laundering when the police came into his home. In all the laundry (washer, dryer and clothes on top of the machines) were found long orange fibers. These fibers were also found in his bed upstairs. Also on a towel in the MH and in his SUV. On Danielle: Tangled within a tangle of her hair on her necklace was found an orange fiber similar in every way to these orange fibers.

Also in his laundry and MH and on the sheet that wrapped her body (wrapped to transport her and capture any trace evidence as it falls off) and one within her hair were found blue/gray fibers. All similar to each other and also source unknown.

In his MH were fibers found to be similar to the carpet in her bedroom.

Also, in addition to the hair in the sink trap with root, there were other of her hairs found in various places. No root attached so the nuclear DNA test was not possible, but MIT DNA was done which determines the hair belonged to Brenda or her offspring. Brenda was eliminated because she color treats her hair, and the brothers eliminated due to length. Danielle's hair was in the lint ball found in his garage garbage. Also on his bedding upstairs, I believe. Other of her hair in the MH.

491 posted on 07/22/2002 8:10:17 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: gigi
Little ditch or little stream or whatever she calls herself has said the same thing "rolling eyes" about every defense witness. She really needs to be more creative with her descriptive rants!
492 posted on 07/22/2002 8:10:32 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
YOU in BIIIG trouble!!!
493 posted on 07/22/2002 8:11:18 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: Lanza
You really need to ask some of the posters about HAZMAT DAVE>>>>>

LOL!
494 posted on 07/22/2002 8:11:31 PM PDT by CAPPSMADNESS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 481 | View Replies]

To: pyx
I don't think Mudd should have mentioned the Samantha R. case AT ALL to the jury.
495 posted on 07/22/2002 8:11:34 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 487 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Probality theory.

According to probability theory, this planet doesn't exist.

496 posted on 07/22/2002 8:11:39 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
People who think accounting is black and white are naive. There is probably much more gray area than there is with bug evidence.
497 posted on 07/22/2002 8:11:44 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: gigi
I actually sort of like her. She seems to be fairly balanced. Wonder how long she will last? : )
498 posted on 07/22/2002 8:12:10 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]

To: crypt2k
Were tires tracks analyzed at the dump site? DOn't know. IMO, if they found tire tracks, and they were obviously not from a MH, then SDPD or the fire department used brooms to get rid of them, like the BLUE BLANKET that they threw away, and any other evidence, which was discarded by the fire department.
499 posted on 07/22/2002 8:13:29 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 374 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
There was DW's DNA on the necklace?? hmmmm. First I heard of this & I've been with this thing since last March, researching.
500 posted on 07/22/2002 8:14:25 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 490 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 461-480481-500501-520 ... 1,621-1,635 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson