2nd Bug Expert Bolsters Westerfield Defense: (Dusek Melting Down Before Juries Eyes!!)

NBC/San Diego ^ | July 22, 2002 | NBC/San Diego

[VRWC_minion]

The questions was not if she was in the RV but rather when she was in the RV.

I agree. What event puts her there if not an abduction ?

[VRWC_minion]

OK then....time for you alone to read up...or move along.....

If someone claimed they can prove a negative they should have no problem proving God doesn't/does exist. Hint: Its not possible.

[NatureGirl]

The man's opinion comes from his being expert but its still potentialy wrong or based on mistaken data.

As is every "expert's" evidence that we've heard over the past few weeks! Should we disregard everything an "expert" says? Or does this only apply to defense evidence?

Sheesh!

[Hildy]

We're all watching the same thing, aren't we? I believe this guy is guiltier then hell and if I were on the jury, that's how I would vote.

[willyone]

Don't you people have lives? Is this all you have to worry about? Maybe you should start a DW fan club. Hold some candlelight vigils. Get together at Dads and have re enactments.

[UCANSEE2]

Experts can be bought regardless of reputations

I think what he is referring to is the fact that DUSEK hired Faulkner to investigate. When Faulkner's conclusions didn't support the Prosecution, Dusek didn't want Faulkner as a witness. Now DUSEK has gone out and tried to find an 'expert' that will say what DUSEK wants. If/when he finds one, he will PAY that person to TESTIFY. (or would have, but Prosecution is supposed to have rested).

So, kinda the same thing.

[FresnoDA]

VDA's have spun this day's VD Threads into a sewer of distraction, disinformation and deceit....

How enjoyable....LOL/so

THREAD BANG = A GROUP OR GANG of 6 or more THREADJACKALS, in an organized attack and posting via the pile on method...accomplished by singling out a small number of posters, and focusing on mundane misinformation....IE: Underwear vs. Jogging Shorts!

[Rattlins]

Sounds like the same people keep pressing their same opinion, I just hope the jury is more alert to facts and is able to respect the opinion of experts to determine "Westy's" guilt or innocense. What frightens me is this FREEPER exchange which shows it's bias!
No matter what school you are from, if you are objective,
then you have to admit that today's testimony by the defense was the most powerful presented to date!
Now, that is not to say he is innocent, but it goes a long way to anyone's measure of Reasonable Doubt!
Now I know some of you just keep repeating the same old
reasoning and have no concept of the FACTS!

[Freedom2specul8]

Don't put me in the DW fan club please.....yikes Or was that comment directed to everyone?

[Simcha7]

The son has 7 or 8 "friends"?

Could they be protecting their "friend"?

Just wondering...if the son had anything to do with his father's perversions and lifestyle; didn't they share the Same computer?

Blood is thicker than water.

Someone had to put Danielle's body where it was found.

If it was Not Westerfield himself...then who did it?

The very sad truth is...we may Never know.

[UCANSEE2]

Maybe he left his jacket in the RV when he left it unlocked so Danielle could sneak in, wash her hair, leave a finger print and prick herself.

Actually, The reason for her 'blood' and prints is that DW picked her up Sat morning, and since he was hung over, Danielle drove the MH around the desert, while DW sat in the back and watched PORNOS. Danielle's poor driving got them stuck out in the desert and cost DW $80. That is why he later killed her and hid the body. That is why her prints, hair, and drops of blood were in the MH.

(/sarcasm)

[FresnoDA]

BUMP/PING...see post #168!!!

[CAPPSMADNESS]

In what way are Accounting and Forensics similar?

[VRWC_minion]

As is every "expert's" evidence that we've heard over the past few weeks! Should we disregard everything an "expert" says? Or does this only apply to defense evidence

Not arguing that. Apparently some want to take this experts opinion and put it on the same level as DNA testing. I don't think that its that exact and if its not that exact one could arive at different conclusions using the same data and still be considered to be giving a valid opinion.

When the other evidence strongly suggests that Danielle was in the MH and their is no reasonable explanation (I don't buy the snuck in to play one for several reasons) and that Danielle has fibers on her that belong to Westerfield, I think the experts testimony contradicts facts and his opinion must be wrong.

[willyone]

You are the one with problems. If you have a problem with Poohbah why don't you get off the threads. Who the heck are you to not allow a different opinion? What do you have a DW shrine in your house or something? All I want is the guilty party, whoever that may be convicted and punished. This insect stuff considering it is only a guesstimate is interesting but not that accurate.

[Henrietta]

Yes, I meant the prosecution. I misspoke, I was not "confused." Thanks for pointing out my inadvertent error.

[UCANSEE2]

The man's opinion comes from his being expert but its still potentialy wrong or based on mistaken data.

Definition of an 'EXPERT'= EX is a has been. SPURT is a drip under pressure.

[willyone]

You are the one with problems. If you have a problem with Poohbah why don't you get off the threads. Who the heck are you to not allow a different opinion? What do you have a DW shrine in your house or something? All I want is the guilty party, whoever that may be convicted and punished. This insect stuff considering it is only a guesstimate is interesting but not that accurate.