Skip to comments.
A war on terror or on citizens?
The Washington Times ^
| July 22, 2002
| Paul Craig Roberts
Posted on 07/22/2002 6:19:28 AM PDT by robowombat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: mysterio
"In another thread, I found out that I fit the definition of a terrorist, because I quote the Constitution. " Well, you should find out something in this thread too.
How about this?
: "US soldiers were forced to give up their metal helmets for kevlar ones because the metal ones blocked the transmissions from the mind-control satellites.
Now, the Bilderbergers can count on the US troops to obey their orders at all times."
Wow, look at what one can learn on a thread if one really, really, wants to.
21
posted on
07/22/2002 9:16:10 AM PDT
by
mrsmith
To: mysterio
Welcome to the party. Don't worry, though, lots of Libertarians are recovering Republicans.
We're glad to have you aboard--tell your friends.
To: *TerrOrWar
To: AAABEST
Battle tanks for homeland defense and the war against terror, will possibly be deployed within the U.S. Now isn't that special. :-|
24
posted on
07/23/2002 6:36:24 AM PDT
by
Jason_b
To: Jason_b
"Though he said he could not provide specifics, Horton said the activation was not linked to Bush's quest for use of U.S. military forces on the home front. "
No, of course not.
25
posted on
07/23/2002 6:38:10 AM PDT
by
Jason_b
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson