Skip to comments.
A war on terror or on citizens?
The Washington Times ^
| July 22, 2002
| Paul Craig Roberts
Posted on 07/22/2002 6:19:28 AM PDT by robowombat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
While the 1-800-YOUSQUEAL program seems doomed for this round of anti-terror legislation, Paul Craig Roberts asks "Why are 12 million Americans, in addition to thousands of government police agents with unprecedented eavesdropping powers, needed to ferret out the suspected 5,000 terrorists in the United States?" As part of the larger question as to why the US gov appears to fear its own citizens more than foreign foes. His conclusion is "The best complexion that can be put on this is that the U.S. government has realized the insanity of the multicultural diversity, open borders, visas to all, immigrants from everywhere mindset that has turned the United States into a sanctuary for terrorists and illegal aliens. Too cowardly to deal with the immigration issue, the government instead has adopted police state methods to watch the population." So here we have it. The FBI was so infected with pc virus that it did nothing to move against well documented suspicious activites by a bunch of Arabs attending flight schools in the US thus leading directly to the events of 9-11. Now the same agencies that can't protect our lives due to pc will be given virtual police state powers to treat us all as subjects rather than citizens. Dear reader, do youthink this will stop future mass casualty terrorist acts?
To: robowombat
Open borders for terrorists means a police state for citizens.And PC now also stands for Political Cowardice.
To: robowombat
TIPS and the military power of arrest for "domestic terrorists" go well together. Jesse Jackson is already calling for Ridge to combat "domestic terrorism" against blacks.
3
posted on
07/22/2002 6:37:25 AM PDT
by
cynicom
To: robowombat
BTTT!
To: robowombat
I wouldn't consider it tinfoil if someone were to contend that we are in the process of creating a quasi National Socialist system . If not intentionally then by default.
Our econimic policies and spending initiatives are moving towards socialism while our law enforcement and intelligence ops become facist.
5
posted on
07/22/2002 6:47:18 AM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: robowombat
bump
6
posted on
07/22/2002 6:52:38 AM PDT
by
Red Jones
To: AAABEST
Agreement BUMP!
7
posted on
07/22/2002 6:55:21 AM PDT
by
ellery
To: cynicom
It works both ways, let us see him or his co-horts gin up a riot and see how the "War on Terrorism" suits him after the B-52s reduce crime and welfare roles in fell swoop.
8
posted on
07/22/2002 6:59:29 AM PDT
by
junta
To: AAABEST
Bush has done more to send us down the road to totalitrainism than any President in history. His folding on the ICC, Airport Security, Homeland Defense, the Patriot Act, TIPS, and now Ridge and Bidens attack on the Posse Comitatus. I said over a year ago that in five years the USofA would not be recognizable. I was wrong, it only took a little over a year.
To: MissAmericanPie
Heh. Like I said it's not tinfoil anymore to contend that we're moving closer towards a quasi National Socialist system. It's simply a fact of life supported by imperical evidence.
10
posted on
07/22/2002 7:15:43 AM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: AAABEST
The purpose of terrorism is to induce a government to make war on its own citizens.
To: MissAmericanPie
You ain't seen nothing yet. This is tame compared to what we will see during the coming utopian social engineering project to bring democracy to Iraq with American bayonets and bureaucrats.
To: Austin Willard Wright
"This is tame compared to what we will see during the coming utopian social engineering project to bring democracy to Iraq with American bayonets and bureaucrats."
American bayonets and bureaucrats are what these people are seeing for America, not just Iraq.
To: Uncle Bill
Thought you might enjoy this.
14
posted on
07/22/2002 7:26:45 AM PDT
by
AAABEST
To: MissAmericanPie
Bush has done more to send us down the road to totalitrainism than any President in history. Shhhh. You don't want the Bush lovers to hear you. Don't you know that "he really has a plan, we just don't know all the details? After all, he is the best president we've had!"
I started becoming concerned about Bush during his speech after 9/11, when having the unofficial militia help out against terrorism wasn't even considered. Then came the Patriot Act. Each step since then has gotten even worse, and there is no end in sight.
15
posted on
07/22/2002 7:52:51 AM PDT
by
serinde
To: serinde
What scares me more is the people that believe these reassurances that this only pertains to terrorists. The SS number will never be used for identification, either.
I'll keep plugging away about the States need to drain power away from D.C., can't hurt.
To: robowombat; browardchad
"Too cowardly to deal with the immigration issue, the government instead has adopted police state methods to watch the population."
To: MissAmericanPie
I honestly didn't think Bush would ever do anything like this. In another thread, I found out that I fit the definition of a terrorist, because I quote the Constitution. I have become libertarian in the past year or so. I always thought it was kind of a wasted vote, but with no difference between to parties, I guess it isn't.
18
posted on
07/22/2002 8:07:49 AM PDT
by
mysterio
To: cynicom
Hasn't the TIPS proposal been defeated and eliminated?
To: Right_in_Virginia
In theory yes. They never die, they always appear with another name, more palatable.
20
posted on
07/22/2002 9:04:05 AM PDT
by
cynicom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson