Skip to comments.
Andrew Sullivan: The Times' Poll- Slanted Again
andrewsullivan.com ^
| 07/20/2002
| Andrew Sullivan
Posted on 07/20/2002 2:12:19 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
1
posted on
07/20/2002 2:12:20 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: summer; Howlin; Miss Marple; mombonn; DallasMike; austinTparty; MHGinTN; RottiBiz; WaterDragon; ...
Ping for the ASPL.
2
posted on
07/20/2002 2:13:04 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
Since the mid-60s The New York Times has hated America. What's new here?
3
posted on
07/20/2002 2:18:13 PM PDT
by
NetValue
To: NetValue
Sullivan is on target, his aim straight and true as it most always is.
NYT is fulla poopoo. NYT is wholly owned by the DNC and NAMBLA
Funny. The experts of malfeasant and corrupt journalism, whining about 'corporate' corruption.
"All the news that fits the script."
4
posted on
07/20/2002 2:31:36 PM PDT
by
jwfiv
To: Pokey78
Thanks for posting this. I was afraid it would only be available in print editions of the Sun, which does not publish on-line. I'm glad I had a chance to read it in full.
5
posted on
07/20/2002 2:32:36 PM PDT
by
Silly
To: Pokey78
bump
To: Silly
To: jumpstartme
NY Times; Sun
To: Pokey78
Sullivan might be overlooking the good news here -- which is that the Washington Post tends to support Bush. That's one more Washington paper than has supported any other Republican. (No, I'm not confusing the Post with the Washington Times.)
On the liberal message boards, the Dims despise both the NYT and the WP, but they hate the Post most.
To: Hardy Harhar
The Washington Post supporting President Bush? That's news to me
10
posted on
07/20/2002 5:05:59 PM PDT
by
Kaslin
To: Kaslin
DNC spin...
To: NetValue
The Grey Lady has been diagnosed with senile dementia.
To: jwfiv
I think this is especially funny since it was just recently revealed the NYT was in bed with Enron.
Perhaps this little poll was to take the heat off themselves. Here we go again - shades of Clinton spin.
13
posted on
07/20/2002 6:54:24 PM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: Kaslin
The Washington Post supporting President Bush? That's news to me ...and to me. They sure don't use the flattering, positive pictures that we see daily in Rintense' thread. They usually choose an expression in which he looks weak or goofy. They have a huge number of pictures to choose, including many when he is speaking. The choice is an editorial comment itself.
To: Pokey78
Here's a classic: "Do you think George W. Bush is in charge of what goes on in his administration most of the time or do you think other people are really running the government?" Who wrote that question? Terry McAuliffe?LOL
15
posted on
07/20/2002 8:45:55 PM PDT
by
dano1
To: Pokey78
If you put the vast majority of writers of the Times in the TV Stalag 13 sitcom (Hogan's Heroes) these fools and liars still wouldn't find their way out... and notifying Klink's sharpshooters of "that" escape wouldn't be a bad idea.
How many of these people have even attained puberty?
16
posted on
07/20/2002 9:07:32 PM PDT
by
Vidalia
To: Pokey78
Any times you see the two words "news analysis" under one of the NY Times blaring headlines, just think LIBERAL AGENDA ALERT!
To: Pokey78
The only sliver of evidence......The New York Times: All the News that Fits, We Print.....
To: Intolerant in NJ
Anagram:
The New York Times = The Monkeys Write
19
posted on
07/20/2002 9:41:25 PM PDT
by
Silly
To: Pokey78
Usually, this is done by crude front-page editorializing - most memorably R.W. Apple's front-page prediction of the Afghan campaign as a "quagmire," or the saturation Enron-coverage a few months back. Lets not forget hysterical "BUSH KNEW!" (about 911) headline ...
20
posted on
07/20/2002 9:47:23 PM PDT
by
Jorge
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson