Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin's embattled jet prepares for first real flight test (F-22)
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 07/21/2002 | DAVE HIRSCHMAN

Posted on 07/20/2002 9:36:56 AM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/20/2002 9:36:56 AM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for the post
2 posted on 07/20/2002 9:45:06 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDominion
BMP....gotta get me one of these. :-))
3 posted on 07/20/2002 9:48:00 AM PDT by Al B.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
BTTT. Love the F-22 although the Northrop F-23 was sexier.
4 posted on 07/20/2002 9:48:29 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It doesn't hurt that your factory is in the Chairman of the House's Congressional district. ;-)
5 posted on 07/20/2002 9:52:26 AM PDT by Bogey78O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Thanks for the post ...
6 posted on 07/20/2002 9:55:19 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I don't see that Congress has any choice but to fund production of the F-22.

The F-15E, as good as it is, is vulnerable in today's anti-aircraft environment, and cannot fly unless defences are first suppressed.

The numbers currently authorized (180), may be about right. I would rather see twice that, though.

If the F-22 is as good as this article says it is, perhaps that explains why the F-23 program is in serious danger of being cancelled. After all, if nothing can touch the F-22, why build another super-expensive aircraft?

A viable threat may have to appear before we pursue the F-23. Sure, the Russian super fighter really is super, but how many have been ordered?
7 posted on 07/20/2002 10:02:50 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
allow pilots to share information without using radios/////

??????????????????

Do they pass notes in class ? :~)

IR data link?. Directed laser data link, ala the Trident subs?
8 posted on 07/20/2002 10:05:35 AM PDT by MindBender26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
the $60 billion that was wasted on the V-22 Osprey could have been put into this program for more of these fine birds ... and conventional money oculd have been spent on proven helo chassis until a viable next-gen VSTOL for multiple troops comes down the pike ...
9 posted on 07/20/2002 10:12:46 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
Do you have a pic or a link to the Russian Super Fighter, id like to see it.
10 posted on 07/20/2002 10:15:18 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
I guessed they meant "voice" radio ... perhaps a direct microwave to satellites where they prioritize / assign targets and the birds hand it back off to the plane? (or laser as you suggest) ... I had read where the F-22 fighters and later would take their target data / threats directly off the birds ... no doubt the military channels of GPS are closely tied-in to all that ...
11 posted on 07/20/2002 10:16:50 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Nice looking aircraft.

The bad news is aircraft like the X-45 -- unmanned combat air vehicles. UCAVs will within several decades replace most manned tactical aircraft. Already, trained pilots are being sent to "fly" UAVs from ground stations around the world. The pilots are bitter and disillusioned. But the future is clear. The pilot community will continue only in logistic and combat-support aircraft.


12 posted on 07/20/2002 10:19:12 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
"We can't know when we'll face a situation that will require the F-22. But if we wait until we're confronted, it's too late. We won't have time to develop the technology or train people to use it."

One of these days we are going to facing China in a possible war. The more advanced equipment we have to throw against them the more likely they will back down,or it will make it easier for us to take them down.

13 posted on 07/20/2002 10:19:57 AM PDT by painter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
If the F-22 is as good as this article says it is, perhaps that explains why the F-23 program is in serious danger of being cancelled. After all, if nothing can touch the F-22, why build another super-expensive aircraft?

The Northrop F-23 was the direct competitor to the Lockheed F-22 and lost the fly-off. There were only 3 built and they are in museums. Which super-expensive aircraft are you talking about?

14 posted on 07/20/2002 10:25:23 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
I assume you are referring to the Mig-35.

http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/row/mfi.htm

15 posted on 07/20/2002 10:26:05 AM PDT by VOR78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Sukhoi 37
16 posted on 07/20/2002 10:31:46 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Also, many wonder whether the F-22, conceived in the mid-1980s to counter the Soviet Union, is the right weapon for a world in which the chief adversaries are terrorists and their shadowy sponsors.

OK... And when a threat arrives, we just have to spend 20 years of R&D and then we'll be ready. /sarcasm. When I look at the F-22, and think of a possible opponent... I think of the chicoms.

17 posted on 07/20/2002 10:32:10 AM PDT by TheEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheEngineer; Pokey78
OK... And when a threat arrives, we just have to spend 20 years of R&D and then we'll be ready. /sarcasm. When I look at the F-22, and think of a possible opponent... I think of the chicoms.

And they will be using Russian equipment to counter them.

18 posted on 07/20/2002 10:37:03 AM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
hehe ... couldn't resist ... 8) Deal of the Century at Amazon.Com


19 posted on 07/20/2002 10:41:23 AM PDT by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Very cool jet. I don't mind paying taxes for something like that!
20 posted on 07/20/2002 10:46:03 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson