Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

** Action Alert ** Petition to Reverse Roe v. Wade !!
PetitionOnline ^ | 15 July 2002 | David C. Osborne

Posted on 07/16/2002 11:58:42 AM PDT by davidosborne

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last
To: cgk

Thanks for the ping.


121 posted on 03/07/2006 6:06:52 PM PST by confederate_infidel (I am logged in... therefore I AM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: FreeTally

This is the real conundrum of the present debate. I'm certain the supreme court does not wish to address the issue of the death penalty for abortion, those who commit, and those who submit. The implications are huge and beyond where the supreme court ought to go IMHO.

I think Roe v Wade should be vacated simply on the issue that Roe has since recanted her testimony, and therefor the original decision was made based on evidence that has been proven a lie. Return the decision process back to the states from whence it came.


122 posted on 03/08/2006 2:59:59 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: leprechaun9

I agree, completely, but your math doesn't begin to address the magnitude and impact of the 'numbers' There are literally generations lost from this heinous activity. How about we express it in 911's or Pearl Harbors. It is mathematically possible to compute the number of folks the millions of aborted would have produced as couples, and the financial benefit to the world, however, dwelling in the past isn't going to fix the future. Amazingly, I have never heard the prodeath folks even argue about the number of abortions said to take place annually.


123 posted on 03/08/2006 3:17:44 AM PST by wita (truthspeaks@freerepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Flavius Josephus

The USSC has incorrectly ruled that the "right to kill your baby" is CONSTITUTIONALLY GUARANTEED.. therefore an ammendment is the ONLY way to "remove it from their jurisdiction" IMHO

David


124 posted on 03/08/2006 9:41:27 AM PST by davidosborne (DavidOsborne.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-124 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson