"So Scientific American thought it would try to silence AiG with the threat of a lawsuit. "
was the response by Scientific American to a critique of their article on Creation? AIG had every right to correct their mistatements and put them in their place. Trying to silence the truth through legal action only emphasizes how ridiculous they are.
Even this author sees through the idioctic Scientific American response:
"Why the heavy-handed tactics? If AiG’s responses were not valid, why would Scientific American even care whether they remained in the public arena? One can only presume that Scientific American (and National Geographic) had the ‘wind taken out of their sails.’ Dr Sarfati convincingly showed that they offered nothing new to the debate and they displayed a glaring ignorance of creationist arguments. Their legal maneuver appears to be an act of desperation. (AiG is still awaiting SA’s response to the decision not to pull the Web rebuttal.)"
LOL UNScientific American magazine. Still a high brow leftist joke of a rag.