Child porn, sexual exploitation charges leveled against 3 operators (need poll voters now!)

MSNBC.com ^ | 07-11-02 | MSNBC.com

[AppyPappy]

They are pedophiles. Why else would someone pay money to look at kids in provocative poses?

[Demidog]

Why else would someone pay money to look at kids in provocative poses?

Why else would anyone look at underwear ads in the Sears catalogue?

[AppyPappy]

They don't pay to exclusively look at underwear ads so your point is moot.

[SSN558]

Last week I recieved an Email from some kind of matching service for 13 to 16 old's. Yup, I replied with this opening line:

Dear pedophile freaks, your email has just been forwarded to the FBI. How do you like me now ?

When the child porn sites send out solicitations they do not discriminate. If enough people start forwarding these things to the appropriate authorities, just maybe some of them will land a chicken hawk or two in the joint where they belong.

I hear they are not kind to pedophiles in prison.

[Demidog]

They don't pay to exclusively look at underwear ads so your point is moot.

You're not a psychic and thus your assertion that everyone who visits teen modelling sites are pedophiles is not only absurd but rude as well.

Normal people do not look at children and get sexually aroused.