Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Expert: Body dumped after defendant fell under suspicion (SO WHO DUMPED DANIELLE VAN DAM'S BODY??)
Union Trib ^ | July 11, 2002 | Steve Perez/Greg Magnus

Posted on 07/11/2002 6:47:45 AM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980981-1,0001,001-1,020 ... 1,301-1,318 next last
To: UCANSEE2
But, just like us, you have to back up things with proof, if you want anyone else to listen.

Are you kidding? I back up what I say. And the article you want me to look up for you I already posted on the threads around the time of the dog handler's testimony.

981 posted on 07/11/2002 9:01:22 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 966 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Excuse me, but I clearly stated in an earlier post on this thread that the dog handler evidence factors not one whit in my opinion. Therefore your assertion that I am bound to produce documentation regarding an issue I consider of little or no import is baseless.

Same pattern. I am tired anyway, so I don't really care anymore.

982 posted on 07/11/2002 9:01:28 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 974 | View Replies]

To: dread78645; All
Again: Has anyone seen the actual report of the Medical Examiner? Does anyone know what the credentials of this ME? A lot of cases have been given appeals because the ME was not experienced in Criminology. If you know the link to look at this info, please share.
983 posted on 07/11/2002 9:02:14 PM PDT by fussybutt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Are you taking about the white body sheet that the body movers used to transport her into the body bag?..yes, that sheet was used....it was removed from it's plastic and placed under her body.
984 posted on 07/11/2002 9:04:03 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 979 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
It's the ME and he testified right after or shortly after Damon, I think.
985 posted on 07/11/2002 9:04:16 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 979 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
The glossary is great!
986 posted on 07/11/2002 9:04:17 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Like you're joking? About the swinging?
987 posted on 07/11/2002 9:04:38 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thnx! now..if only the stupid newsites would have provided a decent index of transcripts.
988 posted on 07/11/2002 9:05:07 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 985 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I could be a juror, think he did it,, but feel the case was not proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

Thank you...I do not know if DAW is innocent or not. I do not believe he has been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. My concern has been that some are ignoring the beyond a reasonable doubt part.

989 posted on 07/11/2002 9:05:15 PM PDT by bolthead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 969 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Kinda destroys the "sheet kept the bugs away" theory, as if that would keep them away anyway.
990 posted on 07/11/2002 9:05:17 PM PDT by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 984 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Are you kidding? I back up what I say

No you don't. You keep backing off on what you say. Doesn't matter. You have shown your methods, and everyone can see plainly. Just going back and reading your posts, you keep backing off your own statements, each time you get asked to prove them. Then you say you don't have to prove them. Then you say they are only opinion. Then you say.... Like I said, I am tired. Maybe you are too.

LEt's see what happens when the trial resumes.

991 posted on 07/11/2002 9:05:42 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 981 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
What if the body, and the ground immediately around it, was doused with a bottle or two of BLEACH?
992 posted on 07/11/2002 9:09:19 PM PDT by BigBobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 954 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
If the dog handler isn't credible, then why are you basing your conclusion that Danielle wasn't in the MH over that weekend on dog handler testimony?

180-Frank was the VOLUNTEER handler of "cadaver" dogs. The SD PD has a separate and distinct K9 Units that have QUALIFIED scent tracking handlers.

180-Frank was not credible because he did not note the "hit" at that time of the inspection. He mentioned it only AFTER he had heard through the media that DAW had arrested and he had heard about it.
993 posted on 07/11/2002 9:09:58 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Good luck. I begged an extra hour on the computer from my husband but he needs it NOW! Later...
994 posted on 07/11/2002 9:10:09 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 988 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
There would have certainly been evidence of that and it would have been detected on the body.
995 posted on 07/11/2002 9:10:58 PM PDT by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 992 | View Replies]

To: All
Just something I've been thinking - that's probably been thought of already - anyway - it sounded like DW's friends really could have been out at Glamis that weekend - they had been there that same weekend in the past. The DA wants us to think DW may have still had Danielle with him at Glamis - but why on earth would he have gone out here with her if he could have indeed run into Dave and Debbie or anyone else he knows for that matter. If he did see Dave and Debbie - was he just going to hightail it outta there - that wouldn't look suspicious now would it - or was he just going to keep her stashed away secretly somehow while he attempted to appear normal? I don't get it.
996 posted on 07/11/2002 9:11:53 PM PDT by mommya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 990 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I would move
997 posted on 07/11/2002 9:12:20 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 958 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; pinz-n-needlez
Both interesting theories.

I do think there is a chance DVD was not in the home from 11-1:30 or so.

Still not comfortable on the molestation/sex for sale/stuff w/Danielle.

I do wonder who might have turned Neil on to the porn sites tho....the VD's somehow knew that it was in the house.....is there any connection that links Neil to the VD's?...sports, surfing, computers, etc?...any chance they met or talked somewhere?

998 posted on 07/11/2002 9:12:46 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 978 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
I think that could be easily detected, including damage to hair and necklace and plants nearby. I did not notice any testimony if bugs were analyzed for drugs...
999 posted on 07/11/2002 9:14:27 PM PDT by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 992 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
I just thought of an animated bug version of the Randy Newman "I Love LA" video: "Rollin' down, Imperial Highway, Big Nasty Slutbug, by my side!, Santa Ana Winds Blowin' Hot from the South, and we were born to ride!"
1,000 posted on 07/11/2002 9:15:35 PM PDT by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 213 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 961-980981-1,0001,001-1,020 ... 1,301-1,318 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson