Skip to comments.
U.S. Backs Down From Immunity Demand
abc ^
| 7/10/02
Posted on 07/10/2002 7:58:44 PM PDT by knak
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-199 next last
To: knak
This was the first story I saw this morning on my news.. what a crappy way to wake up! I'm so angry I could spit nails.. I can't believe what this country has turned into.
161
posted on
07/11/2002 8:44:23 AM PDT
by
goodieD
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The more things change, the more they stay the same.... See your new Bubba? He's the same as your old Bubba.
To: Freedom4US
we could only shoot at snipers if we could see and identify them as an enemy combatant. I pointed out that by definition, a sniper can't be seen. What was the reply to your correct statement?
163
posted on
07/11/2002 8:48:48 AM PDT
by
B4Ranch
To: Demidog
The latest Congressional bill authorizing pilots to carry firearms in the cockpit was voted on over Bush's objections
I'm glad SOMEBODY brought this up! But I'm sure the Bushbots have a good explanation for that one too.. Look, I voted for the man, I'm a registered Republican (beginning to be sorry about that), I am losing more and more faith in him every single day. I don't like this attitude of backing the guy that can win because he's less bad than a leftist would be. Hey, better the devil you know eh?
164
posted on
07/11/2002 8:56:25 AM PDT
by
goodieD
To: Woodman
Funny, I heard him say that it WAS geared so that MINORITIES could buy more houses..oh..and how about millions for African AIDS? oh..and being against arming pilots... as I have asked before..how long will you have to keep explaining his actions? Yes, he's the best we've got right now, but frankly, it's not enough for me.
165
posted on
07/11/2002 9:01:18 AM PDT
by
goodieD
To: All
To: Reagan Man
Well, it seems they need their 'hate Bush' fix no matter what the facts. Pity isn't it?
To: bok
You know, that Alex Jones, though his opinions have almost always been viewed as being "off the wall", it appears that his claims have come true. Is it coincidence or a willingness to see a "conspiracy"?
To: Woodman
Wasn't it Bush, though, who was playing a classic game of class warfare with his speech about "less than _% of black Americans not owning their own homes, but white Americans owning at a much higher percentage"?
To: knak
Bill Clinton: Chief Justice of the War Crimes Tribunal.
To: FreedomFriend
Is it truely class warfare when you are trying to appeal to a class that is at war with you vs. trying to create a larger war though devision?
171
posted on
07/11/2002 10:15:00 AM PDT
by
Woodman
To: UnBlinkingEye
Check out how many support the "Global Economy". Also how many view America first economic policies as being reactionary.
It's sad. I'm of the opinion that the free-traders, globalists, etc. care about nothing more than corporate profit, and are labeling it as a conservative exercise of free markets (though, we know that's not what is really going on). Either that or they're misinformed on the issue.
To: goldstategop
Its not enough. A future President sympathetic to the ICC can simply cease asking for an exemption. Congress has to write a ban of the ICC's jurisdiction on ANY American into law so another President won't be able to claim that America's abeyance from the ICC Treaty was just a policy decision of his predecessor. My thoughts exactly. I said that to my husband last night. Something needs to be done here to stop Hillary or Al or whoever the next dem president is from joining up with the ICC or conveniently forgeting to renew the extension. Total immunity was my first choice.
But apparently a lot of folks here think we are just either not reading and comprehending the story or we are looking to bash Bush. I read it and completely understand the story. I want the US to have safeguards in place. Not just a "renewable" agreement. I realize this could be the first step in doing that also; to keep allies happy.
I'm glad someone agrees with me.
173
posted on
07/11/2002 10:22:37 AM PDT
by
knak
To: Woodman
Bush could have left the comment out. You know it. It wasn't necessary.
To: CdMGuy
I am inclined to believe the news media doesn't know what's going on concerning the ICC negotiations, other than what they have managed to glean from the DNC or the UN operatives.
I'll reserve judgment on Bush and the Congress decision until I hear it from the horse's mouth.
Concerning your personal attacks on the President you give me the impression you've never voted for Bush so we really haven't lost anything. Hitch your vote to fickle men such as Jeffords or McCain, they are also switching to Independent. Do you really believe you would receive better for your vote? They have all proven til now it's all about their standing-the people's wishes be damned.
175
posted on
07/11/2002 10:52:32 AM PDT
by
swheats
To: gramho12
If you are so sure, are you willing to go in place of the first American indicted?
To: All
177
posted on
07/11/2002 11:27:06 AM PDT
by
knak
To: ThomasJefferson
When faced with facts supporting the notion that Republicans are Democratic twinsSee, right off the bat you got me laughing and made it difficult for me to go any further. Antonin Scalia is a "twin" of Stephen Breyer; Ron Paul is a "twin" of Bernie Sanders; Rick Santorum is a "twin" of Patrick Leahy; Ann Coulter is a "twin" of Eleanor Clift; etc.
I truly believe that you "not-a-dimes-worth-of-difference" people don't realize how utterly stupid you sound. But, hey, I guess I should be happy that at least you're not Democrats anymore.
To: FreedomFriend
True, I know it. Some people demand it and sometimes you have to play the game.
180
posted on
07/11/2002 12:30:01 PM PDT
by
Woodman
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180, 181-199 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson