Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defense could pin hopes on insect life..Westerfield Trial Breaking News: BUG EVIDENCE QUESTIONS!!
Union Tribune ^ | July 10, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 781-790 next last
To: is_is
"It is the Prosecuter's job to SHOW HOW THE BLOOD GOT THERE....not DW's."


Exactly! Now what American doesn't know that?
441 posted on 07/10/2002 7:44:17 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Agree! And as I said before the DA has already rested his case and the defense has several days to refute the evidence presented. I'd be gettin FBI lab to analize the orage (red) fiber in necklace and found where else????
442 posted on 07/10/2002 7:44:41 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: fatima
"She was in his home,no proof that this little girl was in MH home,how did her blood get in the MH.If I were on the jury that would be very important to helping me make up my mind."


Well, when is DUSEK going to PROVE that to us? Hmmm???


443 posted on 07/10/2002 7:46:22 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: fatima
"no proof" There's that word again. The defense does not have to provide "proof", only reasonable possibilities to produce reasonable doubt.
444 posted on 07/10/2002 7:46:37 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Well ... you're entitled to your opinion!!
445 posted on 07/10/2002 7:46:40 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: All
What do any of you think about the Poison Oak topic? Feldman has a reason for bringing that up at least twice now and talking about reactions, etc.

Does he have a bombshell we haven't had a hint about? I'm so curious.

446 posted on 07/10/2002 7:47:38 PM PDT by Southflanknorthpawsis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Trust Cielo!! LOL
447 posted on 07/10/2002 7:48:43 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: fatima
"GUILTY beyond a reasonable doubt" Do you understand JUST what that means.....?
448 posted on 07/10/2002 7:49:21 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 444 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
The statement in quotes was a statement which the defense made. The lawyer said the testimony "would prove Westerfield didn't do it".

All I was saying was - the guy's testimony didn't prove that to me. Okay?
449 posted on 07/10/2002 7:49:33 PM PDT by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 432 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
Thank you for that link (Crime Library). If I may quote from it:

"In short, the fiber analyst compares shape, dye content, size, chemical composition, and microscopic appearances, yet all of this is still about "class evidence." Even if fibers from two separate places can be matched via comparison, that does not mean they derive from the same source, and there is no fiber database that provides a probability of origin.
450 posted on 07/10/2002 7:49:34 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
That orange fiber was 1.5" long! Sounds too long for most fabrics and carpets, etc. Might be a nice match to one of those roughly woven search vest things.
451 posted on 07/10/2002 7:50:20 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 442 | View Replies]

To: is_is
EXACTLY!!!
I'm not at all impressed with the amount of blood that was found.

I would think a reasonable explanation about the blood,
Danielle and friend ( or not) went in the MH without permission to see what was in there and her nose bled a drop fell on the floor and she wiped her finger on the jacket. Stranger things have happened.

But like you say the prosecution has to prove how it got there. I don't think they did. JMO
452 posted on 07/10/2002 7:50:34 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I'll bet DAW is extremely allergic to poison oak. WIll we be seeing him take the stand????
453 posted on 07/10/2002 7:51:14 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Maybe Damon had a rash toward the end of July?
454 posted on 07/10/2002 7:51:59 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
I remember reading speculation early in the case that Damon was covering his arms with long sleeves to hide poison oak. Maybe it was more than speculation.
455 posted on 07/10/2002 7:52:31 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
"and there is no fiber database that provides a probability of origin."


CORRECT!

456 posted on 07/10/2002 7:53:14 PM PDT by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 450 | View Replies]

To: fatima
I have a problem with such tiny amounts of blood amounting to the fact that he did it.
457 posted on 07/10/2002 7:54:28 PM PDT by oremus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 440 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Did someone check his grocery list for Calamine Lotion?
458 posted on 07/10/2002 7:55:09 PM PDT by gigi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 454 | View Replies]

To: is_is
It does not matter what we think but what the jury thinks,if I were on the jury I would need to know how the little girl's blood got into his MH,was the blood on the jacket an old stain,if not then she would have had to been in there in a short time before she died.Many cases are won on spots the dry cleaner could not see.These questions are some of the ones I would have.
459 posted on 07/10/2002 7:55:27 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 438 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
how is he going to "drop" this bomb shell....he's rested....with that said i found it very curious he brought that up twice.....maybe DW is not allergic to PI and he wants to explain away why he didn't contract it....BUT...if that was the case he would have had to bring forth evidence before he rested that DW was not allergic....i'm confusing myself...LOL
460 posted on 07/10/2002 7:55:37 PM PDT by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 421-440441-460461-480 ... 781-790 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson