Skip to comments.
Defense could pin hopes on insect life..Westerfield Trial Breaking News: BUG EVIDENCE QUESTIONS!!
Union Tribune ^
| July 10, 2002
| Kristen Green
Posted on 07/10/2002 3:17:09 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 781-790 next last
To: mommya
I just don't get it - what happened to her? Was she alive all that while? Was she dead when she left home and stored somewhere? It doesn't seem like either one of these scenarios would be easy to pull off alone. THink of the people involved in this tragedy, and think of WHO you haven't SEEN or HEARD of SINCE THE 16th OF FEB..?????????
If you want help, just tell me. I can give you names.
To: the Deejay
The prosecution has used faulkner as a witness before..so of course he's not going to attack his credibility..
To: John Jamieson
The temperatures in the desert mountainous area were below freezing at night that week-end and not very warm during the day, either. I know because my husband was camping that week-end and returned early, on Saturday because it was too cold to be enjoyable.
163
posted on
07/10/2002 4:59:32 PM PDT
by
Eva
To: gigi
Also Dusek wasn't yelling at this witness, didn't make him cry, wasn't being snide, he was totally respectful and didn't try to damage his credibility in any way. This should help the Defense. Dusek couldn't go after Faulkner since the SD prosecutor has successfully used him before as an expert witness. Faulkner was very poite and did not go out of his way to make Dusek look stupid. He merely answered Dusek's questions as best he could without trying to help the defense. If Dusek had tried to attack Faulkner's credibility, Faulkner would have destroyed him.
The simple fact of the matter is, the insect evidence almost compels the jury to acquit DW. Somebody killed Danielle, but there is far too little evidence pointing to DW.
Some of the pizza partiers have lawyered-up. I wonder how many more are thinking of finding legal representation after today.
To: HoneyBoo
The state rested their case this afternoon so i think it is over for them.
165
posted on
07/10/2002 4:59:47 PM PDT
by
winodog
To: UCANSEE2
David wasn't in arrested until Friday Feb. 22. He was however under 24 hour surveillance and they put a gps on this SUV.
166
posted on
07/10/2002 5:00:56 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
"The prosecution has used faulkner as a witness before..so of course he's not going to attack his credibility.."
Besides, Dusek WILL want to use Faulkner in future & therefore must tread lightly & not anger him.
To: Henrietta
Yeppers.
168
posted on
07/10/2002 5:02:28 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~; cyncooper
Y'all still here? Helloooooo!
Has the defense rested? Why didn't the defense explain how dw got her blood hair etc on his jacket and in the MH..and the fibers/hair everywhere? Could it be that he and the prosecution will answer our puzzling questions during closing?
To: the Deejay
That's true too!
To: All
You're not going to believe This!!!!!!
Damon van Dam'd Blue Van trip with his high school buddy was on Saturday, 2/16/2002!!!
To: UCANSEE2
I am not smart nor educated enough to do that remember?
Only the best and the brightest have a sense of humor
To: juzcuz; mommya
Was it you who posted 'Girl's week at Big Bear' a while back -- not sure.... Do you think maybe she was borrowed for a week???? HERE is a REALLY FREAKY theory.
What if this was pre-planned, but the plan went wrong.
I.E. Brenda/Damon had planned to have Danielle kidnapped for a few days or so, and INDUCTED into the GIRL'S CLUB?
Later, the abductors would let her go somewhere around the hood, and someone would 'find' Danielle alive and well, and everyone would be HAPPY. DW would have been off the hook (he was just to keep police busy).
But something went wrong, and Danielle ended up dead.
To: connectthedots
And what's up with stupid Damon, trying to reassert himself back into the courtroom?
To: Henrietta
Back to my earlier reply to you. Dusek did a very effective cross exam and the last point made by Feldman was effective but had already been addressed by Dusek and answered. The guy made his determination but it is not exact and as I said in my earlier comment, not exonerating in the face of the totality of the evidence. (IMO)
To: Henrietta
Seems like DuPRICK has forgotten what his duty is, IMO. NOPE. He remembers where his PAYCHECK comes from! He remembers who signs his timecard (the DA)
To: KnutCase
Welcome to the forum...:~)
sw
178
posted on
07/10/2002 5:06:14 PM PDT
by
spectre
To: Henrietta; UCANSEE2
I'm thinking....about how faulkner answered Dusuk's questions earlier...I wish we had instant official transcripts..
Speaking of transcripts...UCANSEE2, THANK YOU SO MUCH for your extra hard work transcribing for us!!
To: UCANSEE2
What is the Girl's Club?
I am still trippin' they bought an 850,000 home, and the bug guy has blown me away.
180
posted on
07/10/2002 5:06:16 PM PDT
by
Lanza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 781-790 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson