This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 07/19/2002 11:14:21 PM PDT by Admin Moderator, reason:
Flame war.
|
Skip to comments.
Halliburton Responds to Larry Klayman's Supersillyous Suit(My Title)
CBS Market Watch "Big Charts" Web Site ^
| 7/10/2002
| MarketWatch.com
Posted on 07/10/2002 11:04:03 AM PDT by SierraWasp
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,620, 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
To: Howlin; FreedominJesusChrist; deport
Nowhere on that thread did anybody say "Freep this poll." I believe I did say it needed FReeping. Altho, as deport said, it was already losing by the time I got there, and there weren't too many additional votes cast after the link was posted.
Point is, Larry should've waited til the poll CLOSED before putting up a press release based on the results....
And when the results changed, the HONEST thing to do would've been revise his press release...but who cares about HONESTY when your motives are pure? ;-)
To: Registered
Isn't that Gary Larsen's work??
To: Registered; Howlin
Man, what is it with you and your bondage stuff? Or should I ask?
First this:
and now this
Dude, and this is after a hard on?
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Read my last post.
To: Tennessee_Bob
oopsie. gary says thats a no-no :)
To: FreedominJesusChrist
but I still believe that many people on this site purposefully went to the JW site and voted no, to skew the results. GRIP reality.
To: deport
It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know that the poll was FReeped after the JW press release. Sheesh.
Comment #1,628 Removed by Moderator
To: Amelia
Honestly, thanks for being so honest, Amelia. :)
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Vague, didn't answer my post at all, and I wont bother asking you a direct questionwhen I can scroll back thru the pages of FR and see where you accused FR members of stacking a poll at JW with "NO's" when in reality, JW groupies probably stacked it with YES's. LOL
L
To: FreedominJesusChrist
"I never stated that; you are twisting my words" Really? Let's see...
__________________________________________________
"Most likely because people like you were "Freeping" the poll."
What exactly are "people like you"? People that disagree with this lawsuit? So we shouldn't be allowed to vote?
_______________________________________________
"You can vote in these polls, but I just hope that the people at JW realize this when they view the results."
So you are saying that our vote should count for less, or be discounted because we don't happen to vote the way you or Larry would?
_______________________________________________
"I never said that, you can vote if you want to. The poll just is not accurate because of the number of "Freeps".
You have posted this theory several times even though several people have verified that we were only allowed to "casted" our vote once. No matter how many times you post it, it doesn't make it true.
_________________________________________________
""Second, do you REALLY think that OVER 1500 PEOPLE read this thread and scooted over there late last night just to make this poll look bad???"
"Yes."
Seriously, there were maybe 25-30 posters total on this thread. It's been well established that we could only "casted" our vote once. Next...
___________________________________________________
"Well, since that's not the case, let's go back to the original subject of someone on this thread deliberately posting the link to this poll in order to maliciously sway the results."
Now we're malicious because we dared to vote once in one of Larry's polls?
_________________________________________________
Signed,
A lazy, malicious, complaining derelict.
To: Registered
I agree. It probably had tons of folks hit it with YES. I was only able to vote NO once, but it allowed me multiple YES, must be broke, darnit.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
You're Christian Witness needs improvement too. So much for iron sharpening iron eh?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
And when the results changed, the HONEST thing to do would've been revise his press release...but who cares about HONESTY when your motives are pure? Honestly, thanks for being so honest, Amelia. :)
Well, that was honest!
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Thus proving the point that if you voted "yes" you were allowed back in to view the results, and if you voted "no" you were not.
Case closed.
To: deport
It is always nice to know that I have your approval, DEPORT.
Good-night.
To: deport
Thank you for proving my point that there were maybe 25 - 30 total posters on this thread.
To: terilyn
Seriously, there were maybe 25-30 posters total on this thread. It's been well established that we could only "casted" our vote once. Next... Which corresponds well with the 26-30 additional votes recorded after the link was posted...including several "YES" votes, by the way.........
To: FreedominJesusChrist
but I still believe that many people on this site purposefully went to the JW site and voted no, to skew the results.
But Rebeckie, there were only 26 additional votes made after I voted and posted the results.... which was only two minutes after the link was posted.... Not that many people would have voted in the two minutes..... So the poll was losing already.... No I don't frequently the watch web site that often. I do go there to look for material when something is in question but daily, no way.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
No JW groupies were "stacking" the polls.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,601-1,620, 1,621-1,640, 1,641-1,660 ... 3,801-3,815 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson