Posted on 07/10/2002 6:20:52 AM PDT by OPS4
This is incorrect - unconditional surrender and quarter are entirely different matters. One gives "quarter" - that is, one doesn't kill the other fellow - as a result of surrender, unconditional or otherwise. FDR - and Churchill, and Grant - are safe enough.
What is actually happening to Clinton is a punishment far more appropriate than ICC prosecution: a slow revealing of just how greasy the man really is, and a Chinese-water-torture-paced slide into obscurity and irrelevance. That's gotta hurt.
You kep saying that, but what is to prevent them from
doing just that?
Once they have the authority to bring people to trial
then they are pretty much able to do what they want. Who
will challange them? US? Sure we will.
Neither is the Federal Reserve.......good luck standing on that document.
If only this really meant anything. This will not stop these tyrants
they will keep chipping away. First will be trade weapons
then money flow, travel visas.....and so on.
This cancer on the world of free societies can only be
stopped with a total repudiation of this kangaro court.
The President should announce that we will defend any
person/country from the tyrany of this court.
Of course that still leaves that nasty situation with Slodobo.
They won't be able to teach him what "IS" means, either !! !!
Time to carpet bomb Belgium with nukes? hehe
NATO's Clinton should have the same opportunity. He should be indicted however we would not have to deliver him. It would be a feather in their cap, as it was for the Houses' impeachment of Clinton.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.