Skip to comments.
VICE PRESIDENT CHENEY SUED PERSONALLY FOR ALLEGED STOCK FRAUD(By Judicial Watch)
Judicial Watch ^
| 7/10/02
| Judicial Watch
Posted on 07/09/2002 4:44:40 PM PDT by Paul_E_Ester
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 841-846 next last
To: Paul_E_Ester
Well, blather, peetah and brokenjaw will probably LEAD their broadcasts with news of THIS lawsuit unlike when ole' lar was filing suits against the RATS.
Has he gone after Terry McAwful for the Global Crossing fiasco?
141
posted on
07/09/2002 6:15:37 PM PDT
by
mombonn
To: Radioactive
Allot like a dog that is always
chasing cars..
Doesn't catch any.. Probably wouldn't know what to do with one if he did.
142
posted on
07/09/2002 6:15:51 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: TLBSHOW
Note that the suit over the Energy Task Force contains an "et al". The et al includes the Bush brothers and Lynn Cheney.
Jeb is included because he signed off on the leases in the eastern gulf Area 181 that Anadarko eventually bought. Lynn Cheny is included because she was a board member at Union Pacific Resources when Anadarko merged wirh UPR and she got a big slug of money out of the deal. The mineral rights that Anadarko got out of the deal were the ones located on western Federal lands that Bush eventually opened for exploration.
To: TLBSHOW
Sorry---WRONG!---I'm a person who believes that both DEMopubs and REPulicrats have gotten us where we are today-- a socialist marxist state.
I'm a proud libertarian who knows the score. Bush 43 is a new world order guy just as Clinton is just as Bush 41 and so on and so on. I don't care who they are, if corrupt-----GO TO JAIL!!!!!!!!!
Just because you folks don't like the message, lets just kill the messenger. These people who we are told are the only choice for our leaders are corrupt. The people who control who we get to vote for are the ones who run the show. Labeling someone as a Liberal Or Conservative is just a bunch of hooey. These artificial labels are used by the elite to keep all of us off guard.
So don't go off saying I'm a Liberal or a Conservative---what the heck are we trying to conserve? And what's so liberal about what the Democrats are doing as compared to the Republicans?
THERE ISN'T ANY DIFFERENCE.
To: Radioactive
So how many votes did Harry Browne get when he ran for president?
145
posted on
07/09/2002 6:20:11 PM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: Radioactive
Do you think Klayman would accept the libertarian nomination for Prez?
To: Radioactive
Do you even know what you are talking about?
147
posted on
07/09/2002 6:20:53 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Paul_E_Ester; Trueblackman
Has Judicial Watch ever actually WON a case? ANY case? Small claims? The Peoples Court? I don't think so...can't think of any, but I DO hope they win the (real REVEREND) Jesse Lee Peterson vs. (fake rev) Jesse Jackson Toyota shakedown case. I just got a fund-raising notice in the mail from them on that today. That would be an impressive first victory worth cheering about, IMHO, and may chang my opinion about JW.
148
posted on
07/09/2002 6:23:03 PM PDT
by
RFP
To: Miss Marple
>I am telling you, Klayman HAS to be getting money from democrats. Nothing else makes any sense.<
Maybe Klayman's no one's lap dog and maybe Cheney did pull some financial shenanigans Are you naive enough to believe that ALL conservative Pubbies are squeaky clean?
What I'm interested in is how the liberal media will cover this. They passed JW off as right-wing crazies when they were going after Clinton & Co. Just like the people here praised them for going after Clinton & Co.
Judicial Watch: Fair and Balanced public advocacy group?
Maybe that depends on whose ox is being gored.
To: TLBSHOW
I do know what I talk about but do you know why you had to ask that question?
I'm shaking your belief system telling you what you should already know---but don't because your daddy and his daddy voted either republican or democrat. Old habits are hard to break.
Face the facts---Bush and Cheney are corrupt--just as Clinton Gore---Just as etc--etc.....All politicians are corrupt---even the ones who are new at the game end up getting corrupted by the system.
To: PhiKapMom
Wouldn't it be a hoot if how they were hooked in was that they are DemocRATS pretending to be Republicans?
Calling Alan Keyes a Democrat plant is stretching it a bit imo.
151
posted on
07/09/2002 6:27:32 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Miss Marple
IF you start it, I will join.
I actually got a fundraising letter this week from Klayman. Sorry I tore it up and threw it away before this came out so I can't send back the torn up pieces with a choice note.
Hopefully this thread could be printed out by an enterprising individual and emailed or snailmailed to Klayman.
I believe Mr. Klayman now falls into the category of "useful idiot" that the old time communists were fond of yanking around to do their bidding. Wonder how it feels for him to have puppet masters pulling his strings - but him not even being aware (or maybe he is) of the identify of his allies. Larry is supposedly a Christian man. He needs to consider what affiliation with anti-God atheistic communists means for Christians. It is - or should be - ANATHNEMA - to every true Christian to be in such an alliance.
To: Radioactive
Whoa! Loosen up the tin foil hat a bit, you're beginning to implode.
To: jaime1959
They have this say to larry.
Go Larry Go!
154
posted on
07/09/2002 6:29:52 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Radioactive
you haven't shaken a thing.
155
posted on
07/09/2002 6:32:29 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Radioactive
You know, you can keep spewing that junk about Cheney and Bush being as corrupt as Gore and Clinton...I just don't buy it.
Logically, all of these issues should have been dug up during the campaign. In fact, the Harken case was (as it was in 94 and 98 as well).
Dick Cheney has the reputation of being one of the most ethical people in Washington. Even democrats who opposed him in Congress had nothing but good things to say about his character.
So you go right ahead with yout little rant. I'm not buying it.
Klayman is doing the DNC's bidding, either inadvertantly or as an ally.
To: Ben Ficklin
There is no way that Klayman would ever be allowed to be the Libertarian presidential candidate. He is not a libertarian. Quite the opposite. Even Ron Paul had to work hard to earn the Libertarian nomination. No one as corrupt as Larry Klayman has a chance.
Klayman would love to be the vice-presidential candidate behind John McCain on whatever Ross Perot can put together in 2004 (Reform? Independent?).
To: terilyn
I'm listening to lawyers on the radio news criticizing President Bush's call to accountability for corporations....lawyers in America today...lecturing the President on ehtics? This day is just one big dungheap of hypocrisy.
To: Miss Marple
Then I can send out fundraising letters asking for donations to watch the watchdog. Ha!Hey, I'll donate :o)
To: PhiKapMom
PhiKapMom, I applaud your alert and inquiring mind, but I just happen to know that in this you are wrong. Larry Klayman really and truly despises Bill and Hillary Clinton and all of their crowd. Of this I am 100% convinced. I simply cannot be that bad a judge of people, and Klayman simply cannot be that good an actor, especially since he is so transparently dishonest on so many other things.
No, it's Perot. Perot, Perot, Perot, Perot, Perot.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 841-846 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson