Skip to comments.
Man Wins Free Dream Home, Can't Afford Sales Tax
nbc5i ^
Posted on 07/05/2002 8:52:50 PM PDT by chance33_98
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Insane.
To: chance33_98
The People's Republic Of Maryland does not allow common citizens to prosper. Only the Elite Government Bureaucrats.
2
posted on
07/05/2002 8:55:02 PM PDT
by
Goldi-Lox
To: chance33_98
Why does the title say sales tax? Home sales are not taxed by the feds or any state that I know of.
To: chance33_98
Since when is there a sales tax applied to a home??? Now, Federal / State taxes on the home as "income", I can see (hate it, but that's reality), but a sales tax???
To: RightOnline
That's how the headline was written...
To: VA Advogado
Why does the title say sales tax? Home sales are not taxed by the feds or any state that I know of. It does not say sales tax; only "tax". It is income tax we all have to pay.
6
posted on
07/05/2002 8:58:00 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: VA Advogado
Home sales are taxed in Washington state.
7
posted on
07/05/2002 8:58:30 PM PDT
by
chnsmok
To: chance33_98
$500,000 in taxes? Ouch!
To: VA Advogado
Good point. I assume the article meant county real estate taxes, which would probably cost a bunch on a million dollar house in MD.
9
posted on
07/05/2002 8:59:24 PM PDT
by
spectre
To: chance33_98
I believe ya............I'm taking my potshot at the author here. Pi$$-poor editing, in other words.
To: VA Advogado
Well, see....that's why you should vote for Keyes. He wants to institute a National Sales Tax.
To: RightOnline
Since when is there a sales tax applied to a home??? A poorly written article by a clueless journalist. Why do you expect anything better?
Yes, the market value of the home is considered regular income. At $1 mil, that would put him into the top tax brackets for both federal and state income taxes -- 50% (overall) is about right.
But, he will net about $500K. That will buy him a very nice home anywhere in Texas -- probably even better than the one he sold in Maryland. And the really nice part is that he doesn't have to live in Maryland.
To: cinFLA
It does not say sales tax; only "tax". It is income tax we all have to pay.
"Man Wins Free Dream Home, Can't Afford Sales Tax"
I'm sorry. I thought sales tax meant sales tax.
To: chance33_98
He couldn't afford the electric bills either.
14
posted on
07/05/2002 9:02:45 PM PDT
by
Ditter
To: chance33_98
They need to build those dream houses in cheaper places...taxes on houses are expensive. (It would be better if the taxes were less, though).
To: VA Advogado
16
posted on
07/05/2002 9:04:01 PM PDT
by
chnsmok
To: chnsmok
Home sales are taxed in Washington state.
But I'm sure not at the general sales tax rate that other sales are subject too. They probably have some sort of 'transfer' tax.
To: cinFLA; pigdog; Poohbah
It does not say sales tax; only "tax". It is income tax we all have to payIf the NRST flying monkeys get their way, it'll be a sales tax.
Posing as "tax reform", the NRST (HR 2525) also represents a "land grab" where business interests are favored over individuals purchasing for their own use:
- A family purchasing their own new home for $200,000 pays NRST at a tax-included 23% rate. This means that of the $200,000 paid, $154,000 goes to the seller, and the Gov't receives $46,000 in tax.
- A landlord/investor can exploit the business exemption of NRST and purchase the same new single family dwelling tax free as a rental investment for only $154,000. Tenants pay NRST on rent and Landlords act as tax collectors for the government
- The $154,000 vs. $200,000 purchase price advantage that landlord/investors enjoy over individual personal homebuyers can be expressed two ways:
- Landlord/investors enjoy a 23% discount compared to the individual personal home buyer.
- Individual personal home buyers must pay 29.87% more than landlord/investors.
This a significant inequity between individuals trying to buy their own new homes and landord/investors looking to buy the same single family dwelling as a rental investment. This disparity has long term implications affecting the distribution of private property. The American tradition favoring individual property rights is reversed. The NRST would discourage individual "consumption" of real property.
"... legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind. The descent of property of every kind therefore to all the children,... But it is not too soon to provide by every possible means that as few as possible shall be without a little portion of land. The small landholders are the most precious part of a state."
-- Thomas Jefferson to James Madison, Oct. 28, 1785 -- PROPERTY AND NATURAL RIGHT
"A home is NOT an investment, W/G, but merely a place to live."
Posted on 03/26/2001 16:27:50 PST by pigdog
To: pigdog, Willie Green
It's amazing how many people view a home as an "asset," as well. It's a frickin' LIABILITY.
90 Posted on 06/29/2001 09:45:01 PDT by Poohbah
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Well, see....that's why you should vote for Keyes. He wants to institute a National Sales Tax.
LOL I don't know which is more unlikely - Keyes being elected president, or me willing a million dollar home. :) At least I can say I've never entered such a drawing.
To: VA Advogado
Nowadays they apply a massive amount of taxes when you win ANYTHING. I don't think it's just sales taxes. You know when those publisher's clearing house winners win $100 million they've really only won about $40 million after taxes.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson