Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield attorney's begin defense: Dusek STUNNED by Defense calling for Keith Stone. Barb next?
Union Trib ^ | July 2, 2002 | Union Trib

Posted on 07/02/2002 6:10:56 PM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-442 next last
To: Rheo
One of DW's shoes was used with the dogs before they entered the VD home....why did the dog not alert to DW as having been in that house?

I think this is another key piece of evidence that is clearly exculpatory.
So, BTTT for your excellent find !
321 posted on 07/02/2002 11:05:44 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: pyx
And 25 pairs of his shoes had no VD fibers. If he was dumb enough to kill her and keep his jacket, I don't think he would have gotten rid of the shoes he was wearing.
322 posted on 07/02/2002 11:07:46 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
There was a short dark hair under her arm, which was not DW's. Another unidentified hair.

Add the one under her body that is unidentified....geez.....and the color treated hairs in the MH..unidentified (not cross checked with anyone)

323 posted on 07/02/2002 11:07:57 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Kieth Stone knows something. I hope he comes back to testify.

Anyone know anything about the immunity rumors?

This is getting interesting. One more day for this week and then we'll have to wait for Monday.

324 posted on 07/02/2002 11:08:27 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Daddy felt sudden need to trade his van.
325 posted on 07/02/2002 11:10:02 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: It's me
IIRC, he is subject to recall. Maybe he and Barb will answer some of our questions before this is over.

I don't know anything about immunity.
326 posted on 07/02/2002 11:11:19 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Thanks.....they give us 180Frank and his 18 day delayed reporting of a positive hit...and no mention of this.

The jury has got to have questions.

327 posted on 07/02/2002 11:12:00 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 321 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Yes, you are confused. Reading the transcripts would clear up alot of this confusion in my opinion. That way, maybe you could fit your conclusions around facts and the rest of us won't be confused by your confusion. Hope this helps.
328 posted on 07/02/2002 11:13:13 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: It's me
The immunity rumors were asked by Feldman to Dusek and the court at the end of the day, during the week the pizza gang testified.

They were discussing witnesses and Feldman says I hear a couple of the witnesses have retained attorneys...yes says Dusek....Feldman asks if they have been granted immunity...Dusek says not at this time..Feldman requests to be informed if it happens.

The End (for now)

329 posted on 07/02/2002 11:14:55 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 324 | View Replies]

To: Rheo; Politicalmom
I could swear I heard that there were black hairs in her fist, but it won't be the first time I misheard something :)
But, why would she have her own hair in her fist?
330 posted on 07/02/2002 11:15:05 PM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 319 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Latest CourtTV poll:

Could Danielle have wandered into Westerfield's motor home on her own?

Yes 56%
No 44%
331 posted on 07/02/2002 11:17:41 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: nycgal
All the hair talk is certainly confusing!!

The expert said it was common for bodys to be found with their own hair in their hands...go figure.

332 posted on 07/02/2002 11:17:58 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Did anyone hear ANY testmony that proved beyond a reasonable doubt that westefield did anything? And th eprosecution has RESTED???
333 posted on 07/02/2002 11:18:27 PM PDT by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: It's me
Dylan and the street crossing incident is in addition to the saving by Mark...they wouldn't let him tell that for some reason.
334 posted on 07/02/2002 11:19:29 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 318 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
Did Nancy forget to vote?
335 posted on 07/02/2002 11:20:26 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
"Most of us here waited to see if Prosecution had some proof that would convince us DW was the culprit. Had they, I know I, and suspect others, would have not had any problem with saying, "we were wrong, the guy is guilty".

A question for you, UCANSEE2 (because you have quite a handle on this case). Have you given any thought to the possibility that Danielle was murdered because she came in on the orgy and the members freaked out and they all decided she "had to go", or that Danielle had actually been *involved* in the sex orgies and was making noise about telling someone, or the possibility that Westerfield was present at the orgy, too, but was so stinking out of it that they decided to put the onus on Westerfield with the hope he wouldn't remember anything "he did" becoming the most likely suspect? Something truly smells about this case AND the Smart case as well. I think these sex scandals are related in some way; maybe there are high officials (police included) in San Diego who are also members of this swing club and that the porno bust months ago produced some snitches who got immunity to tell all. I mean, isn't it a co-inkydinky that all these sex scandals (Danielle, Smart, Chandra Levy, the priests, the previous porno bust a few months ago and *now* the international porno sting) are clustered together?

Just some food for thought..

336 posted on 07/02/2002 11:21:00 PM PDT by JusticeLives
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
YES, He sometimes forgot to roll his hose!

The neighbors were rolling other stuff. (in the hey, weed, etc)
337 posted on 07/02/2002 11:21:39 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Bunny go to bed,this is an order and you can answer after you get up,go to bed now,do not respond to this thread or any other.
338 posted on 07/02/2002 11:22:00 PM PDT by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
She's trying. She was the 44%!
339 posted on 07/02/2002 11:22:41 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Bunny is right. FR is not a court of law.

I really hope you are not suggesting I am claiming that FR is a court of law.

My comment was initially to AppyPappy who insisted that DW should testify on his own behalf. I stated that DW is not obligated to do so and that a jury should not construe a refusal by DW to testify be a sign of guilt. I stated the jury must presume DW is innocent.

BunnySlippers erroneously jumped to the conclusion that my comments were about thread posters and not jury members. I reminded BunnySlippers that the jury is selected from the general public.
340 posted on 07/02/2002 11:24:28 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 441-442 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson