Skip to comments.
Westerfield attorney's begin defense: Dusek STUNNED by Defense calling for Keith Stone. Barb next?
Union Trib ^
| July 2, 2002
| Union Trib
Posted on 07/02/2002 6:10:56 PM PDT by FresnoDA
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 441-442 next last
To: Jaded
Freepmail alert...
To: fatima
But I do wonder how it could be done and why they didn't present evidence on how he got in and out.Alot of us have the same question...so the answer must be they can not prove it..
To: BunnySlippers
. I'm sick and tired of the Westerfield fans pretending that we can't judge someone that we TRULY believe is a child molester. No one ever said you can't judge anyone you chose. You TRULY believe DW is a CHILD MOLESTOR. Name one child he molested. Show proof Danielle was molested.
To: BunnySlippers
Right you are, we are free to consider the defendant guilty until proven innocent.
To: BunnySlippers
Those who have claimed they are "on the fense" are apparently coming out and saying that the "wrong guy was pegged" ... an opinion. Sorry, but you're wrong. I don't know that the "wrong guy was pegged". DW, in fact, may be guilty of a horrendous crime. I, and I think I can speak for others, am not totally convinced of his guilt or innocence given what the prosecution has presented so far. It's entirely possible Feldman may screw up and that Dusek will deliver what he promised to the jury. In the meantime, I'm watching, listening and reading.
145
posted on
07/02/2002 8:42:47 PM PDT
by
nycgal
To: nycgal
Very Good Point, we also don't know how they really made a print match with Daniele, they say it was reconstructed?
All this from a mummified body! One hair in the sink drain is not enough to convict a man, it could of easily been transferred on a towel taken from the home.
The hard evidence is the blood, that is the incriminating
evidence, that alone, let's see what Feldman can rebutt
before we accept this totally!
To: luvbach1
Jeff Graham testified to it...when he was reviewing the latents that were given to him by the techs that printed..he noticed in the picture there was no print dust..so he went back to the MH in March to do that and look for the earring back.
The tech did also not notate if the prints found of Danielle L and Jennifer were on the outside of that window or the inside.
147
posted on
07/02/2002 8:43:00 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: BunnySlippers
One of the criminalists last week said they only tested hair that was similiar to Danielle's. I'd call that proof. Unidentified prints in the VD home, unidentified DNA on Danielle's blanket. The list continues to grow.
148
posted on
07/02/2002 8:43:15 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: luvbach1
Right you are, we are free to consider the defendant guilty until proven innocent. LOL ...
To: Jaded
The list continues to grow. And how many people do you know that have that grade of child porn in their homes?
To: luvbach1; All
Here is a pic of the jacket stain if you or others haven't seen it yet..the one one the right is a test spot for knowns..the blood stain, which tested to be Danielles measured at 1 3/16"....the carpet blood stain by the dresser/closet was 1/4" in diameter.
151
posted on
07/02/2002 8:45:55 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: Karson
Actually, I made up the scenario(s) to which you refer. Yes, I watch the trial, but only sporadically on local San Diego TV.
To: Rheo
I will be leaving soon. I am gonna try to catch up on all replies first.
Here is the revised PING list.
Welcome to Dread78645 and SheLion !
UCANSEE2;FresnoDA; Mrs. Liberty; demsux; MizSterious; Jaded; skipjackcity; RnMomof7; spectre; Poohbah; BARLF; Valpal1; FriarTom; DoughtyOne; Amore; Travis McGee; BunnySlippers; Hillarys Lovely Legs; fivecatsandadog; mommya; Doc Savage; ~kim4vrwc's~; goldenstategirl; Politicalmom; southflanknorthpawsis; Lauratealeaf; mini_teacup;Snow Bunny; Alamo-Girl; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; onyx;SusanUSA;MdmKoochie ;Uni-Poster;fnord;Uni-Poster; Registered; TXDeb; tutstar; theirjustdue;notpoliticallycor ewrecked;lady reaper;Beach_Babe;brneyedgirl; wonders; HoHoeHeaux; vacrn; Karson;sbnsd;Rheo;John Jamieson;jacquej;let freedom sing; nycgal; hergus; Hildy; tutstar; ThinkingMan; Amore; Howlin; Mrs.Liberty; rolling_stone; wirestripper; Jhoffa_; GummyIII; Luis Gonzalez; Lanza; sneakypete; Tennessee_Bob; Greg Weston;Shezza;Dudley;Winstar1k;is_is;Wednesdays Child;Donzerly lights;Mrs.OStrategery;pinz-n-needlez;Angelique;Jdontom;Nancie;Tiger28;sunshine state;fatima;Henrietta;Blue Screen of Death;pubmom;mickie;Spunky;its me;TexKat;gigi;Yeti;alexandria;luv2lurkhere;JudyB1938;pyx;SheLion;Dread78645
To: Rheo
Thanks! It's just as I remembered.
154
posted on
07/02/2002 8:47:15 PM PDT
by
nycgal
To: UCANSEE2
Have a great night!
155
posted on
07/02/2002 8:47:51 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: luvbach1
But this would have been extremely risky since police were on the scene before dawn. In another time zone, maybe. Police were not called until close to 10 AM.
However, the perp could never be sure just when Danielle would be found missing and LE alerted.
To: BunnySlippers
ANY PROOF AT ALL that no time was spent on any other person or persons. Let me clarify. If I misled you earlier, I apologize. After police locked onto DW, they spent no time pursuing any other leads. From that time on they ignored any evidence that didn't point at DW.
I named specifics earlier, so I won't repeat them.
Does that help? I don't believe I said they never spent any time checking out or interviewing anyone else.
To: luvbach1
Actually one of the "talking heads" (natural blonde) did make the statement the VDs were outside searching for their child at 3-4 AM. She wasn't even listening to the testimony she was being paid to comment on!
158
posted on
07/02/2002 8:50:02 PM PDT
by
Karson
To: nycgal
You're welcome....when Jeff did the orientation example of how the prints were on the cabinet....it would be like if she rested her left hand on that moulding..while possibly opening the cabinet with her right......did not find ID'able prints on the right.
159
posted on
07/02/2002 8:50:04 PM PDT
by
Rheo
To: nycgal
Sorry, but you're wrong. I don't know that the "wrong guy was pegged" No, I'm not wrong, you're wrong. I was referring to post # 22. The "We're on the fence" crowd is not really on the fence ... some are ... but some have never been.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 441-442 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson