Walk Into the Office Of Judicial Watch...

The National Journal ^ | June 29, 2002 | Louis Jacobson

[Howlin]

You should consider yourselves lucky to have only had indians to worry about.

I'm a Presbyterian, for goodness sakes. I'll never forget when we were run out of Scotland!

[terilyn]

Larry is great, "I am sure".

All the people at Judicial Watch are great, "I am sure", is not debate either.

You are doing exactly what you accuse the "Bush-bots" of doing. Blindly trusting and following because you "are sure" you can trust your judgement.

How is how you debate re LK/JW debating, and when somebody else does it they are blindly accepting/trusting GWB?

I'm failing to see the difference here yet you apparantly think there is one.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

I believe that Klayman won that civil suit.

[A Citizen Reporter]

Why did you change screen names?

[ned]

You and ned keep cheering the IRS on, it helps show your true statist colors.

Fred, Judicial Watch should comply with the audit "because no one is above the law."

[terilyn]

No, no silly...you are going to hire me for that measely $250,000 a year. Remember, my job isn't much fun these days and I could really use a change.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"BTW, I haven't seen ONE person say ONE WORD about Klayman's staff; you're the one who keep trying to link them to the remarks about Klayman."

Oh, I have seen it many times. When people on this thread allege that Judicial Watch, as an entity, is a corrupt organization, they are thereby also alleging that the diligent employees at Judicial Watch are corrupt persons. I have a big problem with that.

[Texasforever]

"bottom-feeding lawyer", a "shyster",

Would it be better to use the scientific Latin name for his genus?

[Howlin]

Are you positive?

And if you knew all along that he won and got $15,000, why didn't you mention it before? Hmmmmm......

Where IS the list of cases he's won?

[Registered]

Ashcroft is not the Clintons, and only a moron would try to tie the two together in any sort of comparison.

[ned]

Oh. I guess then you're not expecting a very quick investigation, are you?

[terilyn]

You poor little thing. Maybe you could file a lawsuit?

[Deb]

I thought Rebeckie got banned.

PS: You'd be more believable if you'd stop insisting you're "old", "geriatric". It's called "protesting too much".

[Howlin]

No, they do not. They are talking about Larry Klayman, and you know it.

If you think so, post it.

[terilyn]

Men...kilts...don't get me started!

[FreedominJesusChrist]

You already know the answer to that question and I am not going to address it here.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

YOU don't know what you are talking about. I Freepmailed Jim Robinson and asked him to cancel my account in December of 2001.

[A Citizen Reporter]

BWHAHAHA! From the man who defends Steve Kirsch! You really have me slappin' my knees!

[Fred Mertz]

And since you're here, I'll ask you this: why did Larry get all upset when the Bushes went to coffee with the CROOKS the Clintons, but it was fine and dandy for him to hang around and have his picture taken with Ashcroft -- Larry feels the same way about Ashcroft as he does about the Clintons, for goodness sakes.

Keep your friends close, keep your enemies closer. C'mon howin, you should know better than to ask such a sophomoric question.

[terilyn]

About as quick as a JW lawsuit gets settled I'd guess.

Works for me!