Skip to comments.
Perhaps Looking Ahead, Gore Reflects With Regret
New York Times ^
| 6/29/02
| RICHARD A. OPPEL Jr.
Posted on 06/30/2002 8:11:12 AM PDT by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
So, what Gore is saying is that during his campaign, when he was being "sincere" he was actually being told what to say and do, and was simply following orders.
1
posted on
06/30/2002 8:11:12 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
The last hurrah.
2
posted on
06/30/2002 8:13:40 AM PDT
by
Ciexyz
To: kattracks
Hang it up, Al. Get interested in fishing or tracing your ancestors or something like that.
To: kattracks
Al Gore told top donors and fund-raisers from his 2000 presidential run today that he made a mistake by allowing himself to be too programmed and controlled by pollsters and consultants in the campaign, and he promised a much different race if he ran in 2004.Please, please, please let me run. Pretty please. Pretty please with sugar and a cherry on top. Oh, please, please, please.
To: Savage Beast
Counting things would be nice....There are lots of creative ways to count
5
posted on
06/30/2002 8:22:18 AM PDT
by
woofie
To: kattracks
"If I had to do it all over again, I'd just let it rip,"
Not satisfied with excessive sweating, he now threatens us with flatulence.
To: Savage Beast
Get interested in fishing or tracing your ancestors or something like that.PETA won't let him fish and the tree-huggers won't let him take ring segments for his geneaology.
To: Ciexyz
Is it me, or am I sensing some "it's all about me" and a sense of entitlement coming out of what Bore is saying?
To: kattracks
"From now on I'll be my own man" always has a funny ring to it. It begs the ultimate double-barrelled question, the one trial lawyers love: Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
If Gore were to capture the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination, I think Dubya would put him away, perhaps as thoroughly as Reagan trounced Mondale. The country is unlikely to forgive Gore for his sleazy machinations, outside the proper electoral system, in pursuit of an office he lost. His wooden-ness and general contempt for us lesser folks would be icing on the cake.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit the Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
9
posted on
06/30/2002 8:26:14 AM PDT
by
fporretto
To: kattracks
Does Algore also regret attempting to disenfranchise our armed service members of their right to vote?
10
posted on
06/30/2002 8:27:32 AM PDT
by
mewzilla
To: kattracks
So I guess Donna Brazille, Naomi Wolf and Karenna Gore Schiff gave him bad advice and that's why he lost. The next time we're going to see "the real" Al Gore. I think the electorate is going to be way too confused with all the different Al Gores and just not be able to remember which one(s) they like and which one(s) they don't like. It shouldn't be that hard - if there was just one Al Gore, it would be much easier to make a decision.
To: mewzilla
Does Algore also regret attempting to disenfranchise our armed service members of their right to vote? AlGore is innocent. The devil made him do that.
To: mewzilla
Like the rest of you, I despise AlGore...but let's not forget how close he came to be in the WH...All it will take to put him there in '04 is a half-assed viable run from a 3d party candidate that splits the vote just a teensy bit, and that is what scares hell outta me!
13
posted on
06/30/2002 8:33:39 AM PDT
by
morjon
To: kattracks
So, what Gore is saying is that during his campaign, when he was being "sincere" he was actually being told what to say and do, and was simply following orders.The Sgt. Schultz of the Democrat Party.
"I vuz juz followink orders! The Nazi Left Ving told me vat to say."
"Actually........I know nothinggggggg.......nothingggggggggg!!!!!!!!"
To: Paul Atreides
Yep, he's been stewing over the election night and day for two years and has gotten the bit in his teeth.
Al the Repressed Homo rides again!
(He's tanned, rested and ready)
To: kattracks
If he could not win with all of the advantages of being in office, what in the world would make him think he could win with out them?
Fair or not, President Bush can control the agenda as we swing into the 2004 election. Nothing I have seen so far would indicate to me he will give his opponents anything (just look at the minor dust up when the Republicans announced their convention plans).
I believe the Democrats are running out of "tricks". All the old tried and true stuff is no longer working, the problem is they worked so well for so long, they have not thought up any new ones.
Run, don't run Gore, you are so pre- 9/11.
To: SteamshipTime
And, the article just wouldn't be complete without hearing from Karenna.
To: SteamshipTime
His comments about the budget and the war are petulant and childish. They're aimed directly at the small minority of people who think Dubya is the focus of evil in the world. Those people applaud. The swing voters are appalled. It may be a way to win primary votes, portraying the President as corrupt and incompetent in the war, but it will totally turn off the general electorate.
One could compare him to Mondale, except Mondale had a far more intelligent strategy (even though it failed): He argued that Reagan was right on some important issues, that he had done what was needed, and that it was time to move in a new direction. Given that the economy was growing at 6%+ in 1984, Mondale didn't have a chance no matter what he did, but his approach was far more intelligent than Gore's current strategy.
To: kattracks
Re:
"I'd just let it rip" Gore did himself, his party, and his country a great diservice when he displayed his delusions of grandure in FL.
STATESMAN (putting the needs of the country abov and beyond the needs of yourself and party) is a concept completely foreign to the current DNC leadership, including Gore.
During impeachment, the nation needed a STATESMAN in the DNC to tell clintons overblown ego that the nation would not look kindly on a party that defends the indefensible.
When this happened to Nixon, the RNC HAD SUCH A STATESMAN at the head of the RNC (GB Sr.) and he stepped up, and told Nixon the nation would not look kindly on a party that defends the indefensible. The nations interests were served by Bush Sr. doing what was right for his country, and BAD for the RNC.
After November 7th 2000, the nation needed a STATESMAN inside the DNC to tell algores overblown ego that the nation would not look kindly on a party that defends the indefensible. A STATESMAN in the DNC to explain to him that not conceeding after loosing over and over and over and over and over was not serving the countrys needs. Instead, Dashle and Gepardt did press conferances for Gore, Daily persued partisan strategy, and the nations needs were not served.
Now little al wants to come out blathering like a pimply-faced-poster on DU ??!?!?!
I say, let him flail alone.
19
posted on
06/30/2002 8:49:11 AM PDT
by
ChadGore
To: Numbers Guy
Gore is just flat-out nuts. He makes grandiose, bogus claims, and when confronted with the truth, he backpeddles and claims he didn't say it. He used his sister's death as campaign fodder and tried to sound like John Lithgow from Footloose when talking to the unions. Combine that with his idiotic environmental views (where's HIS electric car?), and you have a real nutcase.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-69 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson