Posted on 06/24/2002 9:06:32 AM PDT by FresnoDA
As I recall, Feldman brought it up at the PH, BUT the judge wouldn't allow it, for some reason or another.
Feldman made a point of following this line of questions with questions to BVD regarding punishing Danielle because she was complaining about the scratch.
Don't ask me for the "source", there is no way that I'm going to look for it!
FWIW
Lucky, you can place your bet that Feldman is going to test whatever hairs he can. He's on a roll with his cross-exam and it isn't even the Defense's turn yet.
sw
http://www.websleuths.com/dcf/DCForumID4/726.html
David Cornacchia - Criminalist - Specialist in Blood DNA
Found blood on pajama arm cuff of Danielle - Item 2-1
Found blood on purple long sleeve shirt of Danielle - Item 3
Found 7 bloods spots on back side of bean bag chair - 8-1/8-7
Results -
Item 8-1 - Derrick Van Dam
Item 8-2 - Mixture of DNA - Derrick Van Dam &
Item 8-4 - Mixture of DNA - Derrick Van Dam & possibly Danielle, Dylan, or Brenda for minor
Item 8-1
Item 8-5
Item 8-7 - these did not have enough DNA
Item 8-6 - No DNA
He also inspected items from Westerfields Washing Machine Item - #5 - bedding from washing machine He collected various hairs and fibers during his inspection Clothing from top of the dryer -- more trace evidence was found....
Now here is a veritable smorgasbord of hair samples....how about Tootsie? Has anyone check hair fiber matches against Tootsie???just kidding..:~)sw
We KNOW she was in there. Where she went while in the house is subject to debate. BVD said she didn't go upstairs, but we KNOW she lies/fails to tell the "whole" truth.
NO blood at DW's, BUT there is blood at the VD's? How did he take a "bloody" little girl into HIS house without leaving "a trace" of blood.
NO blood in the Forerunner either, so just how did he take this "bloody" girl to the MH without leaving blood ANYWHERE IN BETWEEN the VD home and the MH
Well, not from Danielle! And since, apparently, all they were seeking was evidence to prove Danielle was in the MH, everything else was dismissed with the wave of a hand.
I should start adding that disclaimer on anything that I'm too lazy to look for.
sw
Did anyone else pick this up from pp 13-14 of the Redden Interview?
Redden: Were you drunk?
DW: Oh yeah I think so. It was -
Redden: Were you drinking beer?
DW: I don't remember getting home. That's how bad it was, to be honest with you.
Redden: OK. Were you drinking beer or mixed drinks?
DW: Mixed drinks. I was drinking Rum and Coke. I think somebody - see, the mistake I made was, I can handle rum and coke but somebody bought me a shot of something. I don't remember what it was. Whether it was -
Redden: So you'd say you were intoxicated? DW: Yeah. And you know - you're not going to arrest me are you?
Redden: Oh no, no.
sw
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.