Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Westerfield Trial-Weekend Edition

Posted on 06/23/2002 9:35:34 AM PDT by Rheo

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Ignoring the shell casing is like the prosectution saying, "Oh yeah, there was a ladder against the house at the child's window, but we don't think that was the method of entry...
61 posted on 06/23/2002 7:31:34 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: NatureGirl
Maybe it was a normal procedure at the Van Dam house to leave wet towels and throwrugs in the washer.

Do you remember who it was that testified to the towels and rugs in the washer? I missed that part. TIA

62 posted on 06/23/2002 7:32:32 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: demsux; All
I wonder how the VDs would explain a shell casing being found in their child's room? Are they still subject to recall?
63 posted on 06/23/2002 7:37:02 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Yeah, that's understanble. I just wanted to address some great points you brought up in #35..
64 posted on 06/23/2002 7:41:45 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: demsux; All
I wonder why the defense didn't ask them about that casing! I hadn't even thought about it.
65 posted on 06/23/2002 7:42:42 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Gosh, I can't remember. It came up this week - I'd have to check the transcripts. I thought it might have been Dorie Savage, but I can't seem to find that.
66 posted on 06/23/2002 7:52:21 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Lack of foundation? The evidence tech had not testified yet.
67 posted on 06/23/2002 7:52:47 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Ok, that's gotta be it! How did we find out about it though? Not in testimony?
68 posted on 06/23/2002 7:55:56 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I wonder why the defense didn't ask them about that casing! I hadn't even thought about it.

My 2 cents = It is still an ongoing investigation. for get it My 2 cents stink.

69 posted on 06/23/2002 8:00:18 PM PDT by jdontom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Feldman brought it out during the cross exam of Dorie Savage or the other tech ... what's her name?
Sheesh! I usta have a memory. :-(
70 posted on 06/23/2002 8:01:11 PM PDT by Karson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Karson; jdontom
Maybe feldman didn't find out about it until after his opening statement..I have to ask why he didn't bring it up during opening, if he knew...so he could ask the VD's.

jdontom, no your 2 cents did not stink...I think you and Karson solved the dilemma.. no one knew about it prior to opening statements and it's still an ongoing investigation...

71 posted on 06/23/2002 8:07:35 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Karen Lealcala, I believe
72 posted on 06/23/2002 8:09:24 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
The cops said that normally, people dont' point things out

And what do they mean by "normally"? If there were a serious crime committed in my area, something that could have been done by someone like me, and the police wanted to search and ask questions, I would make darned sure that they had every last little scrap of info that showed it couldn't have been me. Why? Because I would want them to "take me off their list" right away. Why? Two reasons - I know that I haven't done it, and I would want them to get on with finding who did it.

Have you ever had to defend yourself against an unjust accusation? I have (in a personal sense, not a court sense). Let me tell you - even saying outright that you haven't done what you're accused of becomes "proof" that you did it, if that's what the person wants to hear.
73 posted on 06/23/2002 8:10:25 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Karson
Looks like it was savage...I did a search over at websleuths.

"Not sure what this is about, but Feldman is cross examing Darie Savage and asking her about a "gun casing" that was found in Danielle's bedroom near the closet." See post #19
http://www.websleuths.com/dcf/DCForumID4/683.html

74 posted on 06/23/2002 8:10:28 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jdontom
Child porn is not a victimless crime, and it isn't a harmless hobby for collectors. Where do those pictures come from?

Seattle Times - Tacoma man tortured, raped child, say prosecutors
TACOMA — A 24-year-old Tacoma man charged with child pornography also raped, molested and tortured a 5-year-old boy he baby-sat, Pierce County prosecutors say. And they say his list of victims may not end there.
Neil Grenning was charged in March with first-degree child rape and in April with 20 felony counts of possessing child porn. On Thursday, prosecutors added another 42 counts: 16 counts of child rape, 22 counts of sexual exploitation of a minor, three counts of child molestation and one count of second-degree assault of a child with sexual motivation. The new child-rape charges superseded the original one filed in March.
Prosecutors say the bulk of the evidence against Grenning consists of tens of thousands of images found on his computer.
Grenning, a waiter and photographer who graduated from Pacific Lutheran University, was arrested after the boy's mother reported that Grenning had taken nude photos of him.
He pleaded not guilty to the new charges Thursday and is being held at the county jail in lieu of $5 million cash bail. He has no criminal record.

75 posted on 06/23/2002 8:12:05 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All
Phew! That time already! I'll be back here sometime tomorrow afternoon.

Good night.
76 posted on 06/23/2002 8:13:33 PM PDT by NatureGirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: John Jamieson
" Nail guns for wood use high pressure air. They still can hurt you very badly...They've only got a few days to go. They need to find more real evidence.....the smoking gun!....What are you saying, the smoking nail gun?



77 posted on 06/23/2002 8:15:32 PM PDT by skipjackcity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
are you implying DW is a homosexual pedophile? or what?
78 posted on 06/23/2002 8:21:49 PM PDT by fnord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Karson
http://www.webbsleuths.org/cgi-bin/dcforum/dcboard.cgi?az=show_thread&om=27&forum=DCForumID8&omm=13&viewmode=threaded

11 IS WHERE THE CARTRIDGE CASE WAS FOUND THAT YOU
DON'T RECALL

12 SEEING THE FIRST TIME THROUGH. ISN'T IT IN A LOCATION
WHERE YOU

13 LIKELY WOULD HAVE SEEN IT HAD IT BEEN THERE YOUR
FIRST TIME

14 THROUGH.

15 MR. CLARKE: OBJECTION, CALLS FOR SPECULATION.

16 THE COURT: OVERRULED.

17 YOU CAN ANSWER.

18 THE WITNESS: I CERTAINLY WOULD HAVE SEEN IT.

19

20 BY MR. FELDMAN:

21 Q. AND YOU DIDN'T DROP IT THERE BECAUSE YOU DON'T
WALK

22 AROUND WITH SHELL CASINGS, DO YOU?

23 A. NO.

24 Q. TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE, LAW
ENFORCEMENT

25 DIDN'T DROP IT BECAUSE THEY DON'T WALK AROUND
WITH SHELL

26 CASINGS, DO THEY?

27 A. I HAVE NO IDEA.

28 Q. WHAT IS A SHELL CASING?
5318
1 A. A SHELL CASING IS WHAT'S LEFT AFTER A GUN HAS BEEN

2 FIRED. IT'S THE PORTION THAT'S EJECTED FROM A GUN, A
PORTION OF

3 THE BULLET. MOST PEOPLE CALL THEM BULLETS. WE HAVE
TO BREAK IT

4 DOWN AND GIVE EACH PART OF THE BULLET A DIFFERENT
NAME. SO

5 THAT'S THE PART OF THE BULLET THAT HELD THE GUN
POWDER AND

6 PUSHED THE LITTLE MISSILE OUT, SO THAT'S WHAT'S LEFT.


79 posted on 06/23/2002 8:22:44 PM PDT by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: fnord
I'm suggesting that the presence of child porn on his computer is a sign that he has no regard for the safety and innocence and lives of children, and as a consumer and voyeur he supports their abuse. Some people seem to think the child porn is of no significance.
80 posted on 06/23/2002 8:27:49 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson