Skip to comments.
Where we differ with Americans
"Arab News" SAUDI ARABIA'S FIRST ENGLISH DAILY ^
| 6-20-02
| Jamal Khashoggi, Deputy Editor-in-Chief, ARAB NEWS, Arab News
Posted on 06/20/2002 8:31:48 PM PDT by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Valin
I pretty sure that the King David hotel was where the officers that worked at the British headquarters and their families lived.The article said that your freedom fighter might be somebodys terrorist. All I am pointing out is that that phenomenon has happened before. Funny, nobody wants to talk about that.
21
posted on
06/20/2002 10:39:26 PM PDT
by
bybybill
To: Restorer
Terrorist are in the business of intimidating and coercing societies and governments for ideological or political reasons. The selection of targets, at least in my view, is not the measure to define a terrorist. A terrorist could push his cause by attacking military targets only, this is of course a much harder prospect than attacking civilians.
No, I have not seen the Patriot. It's just a movie.
22
posted on
06/20/2002 10:42:21 PM PDT
by
spitz
To: bybybill
Please enlighten me, wise one, on what I was doing this obfuscating? Tell you this, I stopped obfuscating in public when you were still in short pants. You stopped being funny then too.
Look up the word in a dictionary, practice spelling it a few times, try using it in context, scroll up & be enlightened.
23
posted on
06/20/2002 11:41:15 PM PDT
by
sofaman
To: sofaman
If you can`t answer the obvious double standard, I guess you will agree that it exists.
24
posted on
06/21/2002 12:04:44 AM PDT
by
bybybill
To: bybybill
bill...lay off the mushrooms, pal. Try to focus.
25
posted on
06/21/2002 12:09:26 AM PDT
by
sofaman
To: sofaman
can`t answer, can you? Hehehehehehehehehehehehe
26
posted on
06/21/2002 12:14:38 AM PDT
by
bybybill
To: bybybill
Don't know what the hell you're talking about, man!
Your first comment was intentionally misleading and blatantly untrue. It's an old and tired argument. It's the same old tired attempt to assign moral equivalence. It doesn't wash anymore. There is no excuse for what these Arabs are doing.
And your running interference for them and then denying that you do just emphasizes your own bias.
Suggestion....go to sleep. Start again in the morning. You're embarrassing yourself.
27
posted on
06/21/2002 12:27:09 AM PDT
by
sofaman
To: bybybill
see ya
28
posted on
06/21/2002 12:27:53 AM PDT
by
sofaman
To: Howlin
Well, I wish they had told us this before.
Think of the American lives in the Gulf War it would have saved.What will it take for our government to understand that the Saudis are the enemy ?
29
posted on
06/21/2002 3:42:15 AM PDT
by
happygrl
To: spitz
Terrorist are in the business of intimidating and coercing societies and governments for ideological or political reasons. This is at least as good a definition of warfare in general as it is of terrorism. It is a rewording of Clausewitz's "Politics by other means."
I assume you make consider some forms of resistance movements and guerrilla warfare to be legitimate and not terroristic. Where do you draw this line? I'm really interested.
30
posted on
06/21/2002 9:16:55 AM PDT
by
Restorer
Comment #31 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson