FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN

judicialwatch ^ | 6/22/2002 | For Immediate Release

[TLBSHOW]

FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN

Storage Facility Raided, Clinton Photographs and Documents Seized

Search Warrant Sought Documents Related to Hillary’s Campaign For Senate, Hollywood Tribute To Bill Clinton, Hillary’s Campaign Finance Director Also Targeted

(Washington, DC) Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, reported that the FBI seized documents relating to Hillary Clinton’s campaign for the U.S. Senate. The documents were seized in a May 30 raid of a California storage facility containing documents of Peter Paul, the entrepreneur who funded Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign with over $2 million dollars in direct, in-kind contributions which were never reported by Hillary Clinton or her Senate campaign, as required by law. Mr. Paul's money funded the August, 2000 production of “The Hollywood Gala Farewell Tribute To President Clinton,” which featured many Hollywood stars. Mr. Paul’s support for the event was also publicly denied by Mrs. Clinton in The Washington Post and in a debate with then opponent Rick Lazio. The government is seeking the cooperation of Mr. Paul, who is in a Brazilian prison pursuant to an U.S. extradition request on alleged stock and bank fraud. Mr. Paul has already provided evidence to Justice Department investigators in Brazil about the criminal activity of Bill and Hillary Clinton. Mr. Paul told the Department of Justice about the documents and storage facility ten months ago, and had provided them with documentation (checks, videos, financial statements) of his work for the Clintons in early 2001. Mr. Paul donated the over $2 million to the Clinton campaign as part of a $17 million offer to Bill Clinton to work with him after he left the Oval Office.

The search warrant authorizing the FBI raid of the storage facility specifically references the Clintons and the New York Senate campaign. The search warrant authorizes the seizure of:

Records relating to New York Senate 2000, the Hollywood Gala Salute to President William Jefferson Clinton, the Federal Election Commission, David Rosen and Aaron Tonken...

(David Rosen was the Director of Finance for Hillary Clinton’s Senate campaign, and Aaron Tonken is a Democrat fundraiser who raised money for the Clintons. Both men have knowledge of Mr. Paul’s contributions.

)

“Mr. Paul could have turned the documents about the Clintons over to the FBI months ago under a cooperation agreement. Instead, he waits in a Brazilian dungeon for the Ashcroft Justice Department to get serious about this corruption case. So it is a welcome sign that the Justice Department is turning up the heat on this new crime scandal concerning the Clintons,” stated Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman.

Attorney General John Ashcroft received 59,535 petitions late last year from Judicial Watch supporters protesting Mr. Paul’s disparate treatment and demanding full justice against the Clintons in this new scandal.

[bescobar]

We need to email this to all of the news networks to see if they will report it on tonights news. I bet most will not but maybe Fox News will.

[Miss Marple]

I am not a bit embarassed by anything I have said. Why do you want the thread pulled? I think it is most instructive.

[Registered]

You're not the embarrassment. But thanks for chiming.

[Registered]

-r+in!

[Clara Lou]

This thread took a turn toward the "insane" when you piped up pretending not to understand what was meant by "having been a mother." That's past tense, as Amelia pointed out. It should never have been said-- it was extraneous to the topic and the thread.

[Amelia]

As has already been pointed out several times by several posters, (beginning at #214) if FiJC didn't have a history of doing this to Howlin, it might be seen as an honest mistake.

She's done it before, and I have personally discussed the situation with her in FReepmail before.

She's being cruel, and you, whether knowingly or unknowingly (at this point I would have to think knowingly) are aiding and abetting her.

Now, can we please DROP IT?

[Registered]

...pretending not to understand what was meant by "having been a mother."

Could "having been a mother" also mean that one has raised a child to an adult? Oh no, it couldn't mean that could it? After all FIJC is using a death in an obscene way. You all really are pathetic. BTW, I'll tell you too, don't send me any more of your screeching FReepmail.

[SGCOS]

have you seen my weiner?

[Marysecretary]

You got that right, GBA! Evil folks they are. I love the remark about organized crime family. That they are. Godfodder Bill...has a ring to it.

[Marysecretary]

I agree. Having had a mother and two young (under 40) nephews die of cancer, and a sister who now has lung cancer (all heavy smokers, I admit), I've seen cancer destroy so many people I know and love that even I wouldn't wish it on Hildebeast or Bill.

[Clara Lou]

~sniff~ ~sniff~

BWAAAAAA hahahahaha! =p

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"by the way, my name is RON BROWN. Put that in your pipe and SMOKE it."

Is that supposed to be a legitimate argument on your side of the debate?

[Miss Marple]

Registered, I am going to be polite and assume you are clueless. My son is 33. I am STILL his mother. I am not a past tense mother. I will be his mother until one of us leaves this mortal plane. My mother, who is nearing 80, is STILL my mother, and considers herself so.

Now, if you do not understand the finer points of personal relationships and the English language, perhaps you should do some home study. There is NO way to interpret that statement other than the way in which it was intended.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Actually, I was 11.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"FJIC, if you were "scared" by the email you received from Howlin, why didn't you forward it to Jim Robinson? He will warn or ban any poster who sends threatening Freepmail. Did you do that? Or are you just creating a big deal about nothing and trying to sully a Freeper's good name?"

That is none of your business.

"As far as I'm concerned, you, FreedominJesusChrist, use Free Republic for nothing but advertisement for Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch."

That is very far from the truth. I support Judicial Watch, yes, that is true, but if you did a search on my screename, you would also find that I comment and debate various other topics.