FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN

judicialwatch ^ | 6/22/2002 | For Immediate Release

[bescobar]

We need to email this to all of the news networks to see if they will report it on tonights news. I bet most will not but maybe Fox News will.

[Miss Marple]

I am not a bit embarassed by anything I have said. Why do you want the thread pulled? I think it is most instructive.

[Registered]

You're not the embarrassment. But thanks for chiming.

[Registered]

-r+in!

[Clara Lou]

This thread took a turn toward the "insane" when you piped up pretending not to understand what was meant by "having been a mother." That's past tense, as Amelia pointed out. It should never have been said-- it was extraneous to the topic and the thread.

[Amelia]

As has already been pointed out several times by several posters, (beginning at #214) if FiJC didn't have a history of doing this to Howlin, it might be seen as an honest mistake.

She's done it before, and I have personally discussed the situation with her in FReepmail before.

She's being cruel, and you, whether knowingly or unknowingly (at this point I would have to think knowingly) are aiding and abetting her.

Now, can we please DROP IT?

[Registered]

...pretending not to understand what was meant by "having been a mother."

Could "having been a mother" also mean that one has raised a child to an adult? Oh no, it couldn't mean that could it? After all FIJC is using a death in an obscene way. You all really are pathetic. BTW, I'll tell you too, don't send me any more of your screeching FReepmail.

[SGCOS]

have you seen my weiner?

[Marysecretary]

You got that right, GBA! Evil folks they are. I love the remark about organized crime family. That they are. Godfodder Bill...has a ring to it.

[Marysecretary]

I agree. Having had a mother and two young (under 40) nephews die of cancer, and a sister who now has lung cancer (all heavy smokers, I admit), I've seen cancer destroy so many people I know and love that even I wouldn't wish it on Hildebeast or Bill.

[Clara Lou]

~sniff~ ~sniff~

BWAAAAAA hahahahaha! =p

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"by the way, my name is RON BROWN. Put that in your pipe and SMOKE it."

Is that supposed to be a legitimate argument on your side of the debate?

[Miss Marple]

Registered, I am going to be polite and assume you are clueless. My son is 33. I am STILL his mother. I am not a past tense mother. I will be his mother until one of us leaves this mortal plane. My mother, who is nearing 80, is STILL my mother, and considers herself so.

Now, if you do not understand the finer points of personal relationships and the English language, perhaps you should do some home study. There is NO way to interpret that statement other than the way in which it was intended.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

Actually, I was 11.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[goldilucky]

All of these employees are bound to uphold the law and abide by the Constitution. For example, should President Bush order someone to do something illegal, they are to report it to the DOJ, which is supposed to monitor infractions like that. Should the DOJ fall down on its job, the complaintant can go to the union or the press, in which cse a special counsel might be appointed.

This makes good sense. And if "all employees" also means those federal appointees of Bush, then one can conclude that they are also bound to uphold the laws of the Constitition. If they fail to uphold the Constitution which they swore to uphold, they can be impeached or removed from their respective office. The point is that none of them are above the law and they can be personally held liable if they fail to do their duty or acquiescence to an act outside the capacity of their office.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"FJIC, if you were "scared" by the email you received from Howlin, why didn't you forward it to Jim Robinson? He will warn or ban any poster who sends threatening Freepmail. Did you do that? Or are you just creating a big deal about nothing and trying to sully a Freeper's good name?"

That is none of your business.

"As far as I'm concerned, you, FreedominJesusChrist, use Free Republic for nothing but advertisement for Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch."

That is very far from the truth. I support Judicial Watch, yes, that is true, but if you did a search on my screename, you would also find that I comment and debate various other topics.