Skip to comments.
FBI SEIZES DOCUMENTS IN CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF HILLARY CLINTON SENATE CAMPAIGN
judicialwatch ^
| 6/22/2002
| For Immediate Release
Posted on 06/20/2002 3:33:10 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 501-509 next last
To: FreedominJesusChrist
FreedominJesusChrist ... member since February 27th, 2002 Probably on the JW staff ...
101
posted on
06/20/2002 7:35:12 PM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: gunshy
You just cannot get ONE SINGLE FACT right on any thread, can you?
102
posted on
06/20/2002 7:35:44 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: altair
They recruit organizations to unsuccessfully investigate and prosecute them. Then they walk scot-free not having to worry about it again.
To: Howlin
Please do not slam Judicial Watch unfairly. I think that this was a great and well-written press release.
The employees at Judicial Watch are top-notch people, I am sure.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Talk about a distortion, you make it sound like George W. Bush personally ordered Ashcroft to provide her a lawyer.
At least be honest.
105
posted on
06/20/2002 7:36:30 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
This thread isn't about Hillary; it's about Judical Watch. :-)Well, now I'm totally confused. I was going to post about Hillary.
106
posted on
06/20/2002 7:36:36 PM PDT
by
ned
To: Howlin
YOU are making is sound that way.
To: FreedominJesusChrist
I notice you always add that "I am sure." I bet you know for a fact.
108
posted on
06/20/2002 7:37:17 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
Well at least he ain't gunshy!
To: RedBloodedAmerican
"Seems like Larry is running out of ideas if he is "breaking" 3 week old news stories that aren't his, and we can't get a reliable link. Maybe a rotating beacon on his webpage would help. Just a thought. If you suggest it to him, maybe he will send you an Xmas card."You are reading way too much into this press release. You hold Larry up to an impossible standard of perfection. I see nothing wrong with this press release; it was well-written and informative, which is something that Judicial Watch supporters like getting from JW.
To: TLBSHOW
I see no involvement by JW here or did I miss it?
To: FreedominJesusChrist
Does Hillary need a lawyer?
112
posted on
06/20/2002 7:38:05 PM PDT
by
ned
To: Howlin
She is guessing or she would know and would be a former employee, along with all the other WISE former employees.
To: All
Who is Hillary's lawyer?
114
posted on
06/20/2002 7:39:18 PM PDT
by
ned
To: TLBSHOW
Oh, this is from Judicial Watch. For a second I thought something important might have actually happened.
To: ned
No need to be confused, ned. This is a story that happened almost 3 weeks ago that doesn't have anything to do with JW's cases, but for some reason they are going to alert the world about it.
116
posted on
06/20/2002 7:39:37 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: FreedominJesusChrist
So you are saying this thread is about JW and not about the FBI seizing docs? Ok.
To: Republican Wildcat
Well sort of.
JW is only reporting what the FBI did without their help.
Maybe they are watching their ratings and support drop and are bringing in outside help. Just a thought.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
I never stated that.
To: RedBloodedAmerican
Well, I know that those opinion polls on their website are tampered with by non-JW supporters, I am sure or wouldn't be surprised if it happened.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 501-509 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson