Skip to comments.
Fully Integrated Scramjet Missile Engine Tested at Mach 6.5
Navy Newsstand ^
| 16 June 2002
| Office of Naval Research Public Affairs
Posted on 06/16/2002 12:04:34 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Cool.
To: miltech
Ping!!
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
DoD seems to have discovered the V1 buzbomb.
3
posted on
06/16/2002 12:10:43 PM PDT
by
patton
To: patton
DoD seems to have discovered the V1 buzbomb At Mach 6 it would have crossed the distance from England to Germany in a few minutes and left NO warning.
Way to go DOD .... now make a decent missile of it.
To: Centurion2000
The speed is impressive, but I think that they were flying in the other direction...
5
posted on
06/16/2002 12:19:35 PM PDT
by
patton
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
The SR-71 Blackbird record is just over Mach 3... Mach 6.5 mean it could catch up to a Blackbird going all-out at a closing speed of Mach 3+... Dang, that's fast!
To: patton
This suckers a lot faster than the V1
7
posted on
06/16/2002 12:32:32 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: Teacher317
Maybe we could make an Air to Ground launched missile that's firable from the SR-71.
Who needs stealth when you can outfly anything the nenemy can shoot at you.
8
posted on
06/16/2002 12:33:47 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: Bogey78O
"Quantity has a quality all it's own..."...Churchill, I think.
9
posted on
06/16/2002 12:50:00 PM PDT
by
patton
To: Bogey78O
IIRC, one of the SR-71's first problems was the possibility of out-running it's ordnance.
This puppy would've solved that little dilemma.
and a Mach 3.2 platform pushing a Mach 6.5 missile would certainly give little advanced warning!
(Ahh, can't you just feel the testosterone flowing with these numbers floating around?)
11
posted on
06/16/2002 12:56:40 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Teacher317
I would love to see that weapon developed. Give it a low yield nuke for a warhead and there is no missile defense system that could stop an attack. It'd be a deadly trump card.
12
posted on
06/16/2002 1:25:23 PM PDT
by
Bogey78O
To: Teacher317
Re: the SR-71 speed record..................................................Don't bet on it. :)
To: Teacher317
Having worked for DOD support companies (Lear Siegler and Qualitron-Aero) in the past, I have been told by people who should know that the SR-71's top speed is much higher than Mach 3.
Supposedly every time the Russians or someone else would set a new record, they would fly the SR-71 just fast enough to set a new record.
I have also heard that they don't really know the absolute top speed. That because of the fact that the engines generate more power the faster they go, that they think the SR-71 would just go faster and faster until something breaks, melts, or blows up.
To: All
Didn't the Russians develop an ICBM that can travel extremely fast? IIRC that why they aren't afraid of our developing missile defense system. Anyway, good going DoD R&D!
15
posted on
06/16/2002 1:54:13 PM PDT
by
Loc123
To: chaosagent
God bless Kelly's SkunkWorks!
To: Teacher317
The SR71 had flameout problems that were cured by continously injecting pyrophoric liquid into the combustors during flight. That was the stuff that always used to leak out of them on the ground and burst into flame as it came in contact with the air.
In flight at Mach 3 and above the effective viscosity of air is like that of 30 weight motor oil. Not only is it hard to get it to flow through the engines and around the aircraft, but a flame out can decelerate the aircraft so hard that the pilots are turned into mush.
Burning kerosense in a scamjet is no small feat either. Unlike Hydrogen is has a relatively slow flame speed and can easily be self extinguished by a small change in mixture ratio.
If they have really done it then, Bravo. It took generations of research to get there.
17
posted on
06/16/2002 2:42:42 PM PDT
by
SSN558
To: RightOnline
Re: the SR-71 speed record..................................................Don't bet on it. I dont know about the SR-71
My uncle was an air traffic controller in/around Reno. I dont know exactly where, but he lived in Sparks at the time. He said the Air Force would routinely tell them they were flying planes through their area and to ignore them. He said you could mark their positions on the screen with a grease pencil as they flew through and then measure the distance traveled each sweep to approximate speed. I dont remember exact numbers for exact planes, but I remember they (according to him) were flying much faster than what the Air Force admitted to
To: patton
The speed is impressive, but I think that they were flying in the other direction... True ...
To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity
We rock.
20
posted on
06/16/2002 8:11:48 PM PDT
by
ChadGore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-22 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson