Skip to comments.
Judge sentences man to 25 years for beating trick-or-treater
AP ^
| June 12, 2002
Posted on 06/12/2002 11:57:24 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
Edited on 04/12/2004 5:38:44 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 821-826 next last
To: Demidog
Can the ownership of property be repealed? Property can be condemned. See the Constitution.
601
posted on
06/15/2002 8:36:45 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Demidog
You dug the hole. You're the one who can't produce the Miller quote.
602
posted on
06/15/2002 8:37:59 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Jhoffa_
Most certainly.. But, who makes that judgment? You just did. Now. Do you have the authority to take innocent life (commit murder)?
603
posted on
06/15/2002 8:38:38 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Roscoe
You didn't answer. Can the right to own property be repealed?
604
posted on
06/15/2002 8:39:18 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Roscoe
Translation: Help me!Hahaha!
To: Demidog
Can the right to own property be repealed? Absolutly. What is your point.?
To: Demidog
You just did. Now. Do you have the authority to take innocent life (commit murder)?
Who makes the determination? Innocent or no?
Is this not the charge of the state?
607
posted on
06/15/2002 8:41:49 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Roscoe
I can produce the quote. However, I don't need to. You have already conceded Nunn V State. Miller explains in detail how the founders viewed gun ownership as an unassailable right. The right to own firearms with a military use.
608
posted on
06/15/2002 8:42:30 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
Can the right to own property be repealed? If Libertarianism were ever established as the law of the land, it would be destructive of our rights to own property. For example, we might have some Libertartian zealot contending that verbal leases had no statutory protections.
609
posted on
06/15/2002 8:42:53 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: FastCoyote; alan chapman
"The claims of these organizers of humanity raise another question which I have often asked them and which, so far as I know, they have never answered: If the natural tendencies of mankind are so bad that it is not safe to permit people to be free, how is it that the tendencies of these organizers are always good? Do not the legislators and their
appointed agents also belong to the human race? Or do they believe that they themselves are made of a finer clay than the rest of mankind? The organizers maintain that society, when left undirected, rushes headlong to its inevitable destruction because the instincts of the people are so perverse. The legislators claim to stop this suicidal course and to give it a saner direction."
Excerpts taken from The Law. - 567 by Alan Chapman
----------------------------
It's become very obvious that roscoe & his silly cohorts here see themselves as some of the above 'finer clay, - appointed agents' of the state types. How weird.
610
posted on
06/15/2002 8:43:11 PM PDT
by
tpaine
To: Jhoffa_
Who makes the determination? Innocent or no? You and I do in this conversation. You know damn well what innocent means and we do not need the state to help us discuss.
Do you have the authority to take an innocent life or don't you?
611
posted on
06/15/2002 8:43:44 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
I can produce the quote. False.
You have already conceded Nunn V State.
False. And no quote, naturally.
612
posted on
06/15/2002 8:44:08 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Coward.
613
posted on
06/15/2002 8:44:11 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
Do you have the authority to take an innocent life or don't you? Under the right circumstances yes.
To: Demidog
Do you have the authority to take an innocent life or don't you?
Ordinarily, I would answer no..
But, a caveat.. Who get's to decide Demi?
Who defines "innocent"? And who is charged with trying their fellow man?
615
posted on
06/15/2002 8:46:01 PM PDT
by
Jhoffa_
To: Roscoe
How many times do I need to quote Nunn V State? I've done so several times to rebut your nonsense in the past. If you do not concede that the Nunn decision was that of a State supreme court acknowledging that the second amendment of the US constitution barred it from infringing upon the individual right to bear arms, then you must be a pathological liar since I know you have seen me quote the case to you personally on at least three seperate occassions.
616
posted on
06/15/2002 8:47:10 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
You know damn well what innocent means and we do not need the state to help us discuss. "Our falling into anarchy would decide forever the destinies of mankind, and seal the political heresy that man is incapable of self-government." --Thomas Jefferson
617
posted on
06/15/2002 8:47:15 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Jhoffa_
Ordinarily, I would answer no.. And sometimes you would argue that we have the right to murder people? Please do expound upon that.
618
posted on
06/15/2002 8:48:48 PM PDT
by
Demidog
To: Demidog
How many times do I need to quote Nunn V State? More than zero would be nice. How about bringing that imaginary Miller quote out of hiding while you're at it?
619
posted on
06/15/2002 8:49:19 PM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
Ahh. So you believe that even our conversations must be regulated by the state. LOL.
620
posted on
06/15/2002 8:49:38 PM PDT
by
Demidog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600, 601-620, 621-640 ... 821-826 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson