Skip to comments.
A Few Questions For Die-Hard Bush Supporters
Toogood Reports ^
| June 5, 2002
| Lee R. Shelton IV
Posted on 06/05/2002 1:20:54 PM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,301-1,302 next last
To: patriciaruth, Jimrobinson
My Vote for POST OF THE YEAR
761
posted on
06/05/2002 10:27:05 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: WRhine
What do you mean
"all talk with Bush", name me one other president that's so openly declared himself pro-life?
Cutting off Federal funding to any new stem cell research is "all talk"?
Cutting off foreign aid earmarked for abortions is "all talk"?
To: Jesse
The Bushbots are just like the Clintonoids, who defended their president at any cost. George Bush never had sex with an intern, lied about it under oath, tried to covered it up, then started bombing Iraq to divert attention with from it, or bomb Asprin factories in Sudan.
To: monday
No, just a regular old fashioned conservative OK. Now which flavor of old fashioned conservative are you
A free market Conservative ala Steve Forbes
An America First isolationist consevative ala PJB
A social Conservative ala Alan Keyes
A libertarian Conservative ala Barry Goldwater
A Paleo-conservative ala John Birch and Lew Rockwell
A Neo-Conservative ala John McCain
The term Conservative covers a lot of ground and you have not defined old Fashioned conservative too well.
To: Luis Gonzalez
There you go again, predicting the future, and projecting your beliefs on to Ronnie. How is that any different than you comparing the times and political conditions of the 1980s with what we have today? If Thomas Jefferson said, "we need to liberalize our immigration laws" would that be relevant to the political realities of 2002? Oh and I'm glad I misunderstood your position on open borders. I guess I read all your pro-amnesty posts wrong on the immigration threads.
765
posted on
06/05/2002 10:30:24 PM PDT
by
WRhine
To: Satadru
... but maybe that is expecting too much from Bush.Nay! Remember, Bush is a conservative, you're a reactionary fringe extremist, with tendancies for absolutism. Nothing makes your type happy. Not now, not ever!
To: Jesse
Conservatism is dead. So what does that make you, a zombie?
And this thread is Night of the Living Dead?
To: Starwind
The point of this post is to highlight the good possibility that CFR/McCainFeingold will in fact be affirmed by the SCOTUS, and that President Bush had the last, best opportunity to prevent it.Ah, yeah. Right. I hope you have better luck with your predictions in the Triple Crown.
BTW, I ain't buying that stuff about "Lurked since '98" on your profile page. There's nobody in the world that could hold out that long.
768
posted on
06/05/2002 10:33:53 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: patriciaruth
Brrrrrwaaaahaaaa haaaahaaa, "Night of the Living Dead" ROFLMAO, My Goodness you're on a roll :-)
769
posted on
06/05/2002 10:34:25 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: patriciaruth
It's the Thread of the Never Ending Night, that's for sure!
770
posted on
06/05/2002 10:34:31 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: MJY1288
Gotta go. The basketball game has been over for quite a while now, and I want to go keep my honey-bunny company. You keep up the good fight. Cheers!
To: patriciaruth
Goodnight, Sleep well
772
posted on
06/05/2002 10:37:04 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: Howlin
Skinny cats rule!
773
posted on
06/05/2002 10:37:13 PM PDT
by
swheats
To: Howlin
Keyboard # ?
774
posted on
06/05/2002 10:37:38 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: WRhine
Show me one single pro-amnesty statement that I have ever posted. You can't, because I have never posted one.
Your problem is that anyone who injects sense into an anti-immigrant thread is immediately deemed an open borders, unlimited immigration advocate.
My posts have always been directed at pointing out the lies that you all have been spouting aboyut 245(i), such as the "hundreds of thousands" one posted on this thread, or the one about it being a blanket amnesty, when in reality it is a chance to obtain a hearing with the INS, with no guarantees of being accepted.
I don't see Ronnie placing any limitations on his ideals, that has to be you projecting once again.
To: Texasforever
I like Forbes, Keyes, and Goldwater,,lol...I'll let you decide.
PS. don't like PJB or MaCain
776
posted on
06/05/2002 10:39:10 PM PDT
by
monday
To: ladyinred
BRAVA
To: Starwind
The point of this post is to highlight the good possibility that CFR/McCainFeingold will in fact be affirmed by the SCOTUS, and that President Bush had the last, best opportunity to prevent it. There is only ONE portion of the bill being challenged. That is the issue ad ban. Of course the rest will be affirmed because there is no other1st amendment violation as has already been established under previous CFR laws.
To: afuturegovernor
George Bush never had sex with an intern, lied about it under oath, tried to covered it up, then started bombing Iraq to divert attention with from it, or bomb Asprin factories in Sudan. Plus he never bought thongs for his daughter .. and his pets are still alive
779
posted on
06/05/2002 10:40:08 PM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Mo1
And he knows what the meaning of the word "is" is
780
posted on
06/05/2002 10:43:36 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760, 761-780, 781-800 ... 1,301-1,302 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson