Posted on 05/28/2002 3:05:40 PM PDT by Timesink
The practice you describe is illegal under the Stark rules. Even I, as an administrator - not a clinician - am not allowed to invest in medically related companies.
Or, just prescribe what was the norm when they were in medical school umpteen years ago.
This is more of an issue. The explosion of information in the medical field is incredible. It's extremely difficult for a person to keep up with all the changes. This is why you as a healthcare consumer have to take responsibility for your own health. Just as you now have to take more responsibility for your financial life, you should take more responsibility for you health.
Of course, none of this would affect HIM. The nets all have marvelous contracts for their top players - with generous pension plans, deferred compensation, fully-paid all-you-can-swallow medical and dental - everything befitting the media royalty. You can bet that "certain pipple" would be able to opt-out of contributing to this National Health Enslavement Pogram - those who are, let's say, "friendly" to the government.
How sweet it will be when this elitist gets knocked down a peg or three.
Michael
You, and at least ONE of them, NBC News, is not even being subtle about it. Here's the plan their Sales and News Departments came up with jointly:
Every weeknight barring extraordinary news emergencies, the NBC Nightly will air a "Lifeline" segment on health. This will be either a new story or one of dozens put "in the can" by Robert Bazell, the net's medical reporter. On either side of "Lifeline" are COMMERCIAL AVAILABILITIES, which are called "adjacencies." An adjacency avail is one that the station or network can sell at a premium price to advertisers who wish to be associated with it.
Thus, NBC Nightly has come up with a nice sales tool - which they use to lock pharmaceutical advertisers into 13-week-or-longer contracts. Every evening barring another 911, Lifeline runs, and on either side of it are pharmaceuticals out the gazotch...the same spots night after night. To cement in your mind the fact that this is a SALES TOOL and not a NEWS PRIORITY, watch what they cover each night for a month. See if ANY of the stories are actually NEWS - and see if any are actually TIMELY. Most will be canned pieces that literally could run ANYTIME. All will be done by Robert Bazell - whom Tom Brokaw calls Robert Bra-zell because of his speech impediment - the same impediment that makes him call attorneys "ROYERS." Notice, also, that all of Bazell's reports fit in exactly the same cookie-cutter format template.
Each one opens with a shot of some disease victim doing some activity that's a part of her/his life. Bazell names the person, and tells us the person's problem as other footage rolls. Then, the victim chimes in with an on-camera sound-byte. Next is a shot of a hostpital/lab doing some kind of work and Bazell's off-cam narration says "new hope is on the way." Then, cut to a shot of a researcher saying something on-camera. Finally, Bazell does a "stand-up" on the street somewhere to close out the report on-camera.
That's the template. He could do a dozen of them in one afternoon with breaks for martinis and canapes and still never break a sweat.
And THAT is the bait for the sale of these Lifeline adjacencies. And it works, too. Every last spot is sold out for entire quarters - in advance.
But the money isn't all the advertisers have to pony up. They also must contribute REFERENCES - patients whose ailments the drug company is trying to cure. If you ever wonder WHERE NBC News finds all these people so easily, wonder no more. The drug companies themselves provide the names and numbers to call. Need a patient with liver problemos? Here, call Sally at this number. They call Sally and do a story on "new miracle research" on liver failures. The story is so undated it could run anytime in the next 6 months.
And they think the Catholic Church has problems. This little charade has been going on at NBC for a couple of years now. Actually, I would have fewer problems with it if NBC would simply tell us HOW they found each "victim" and that pharmaceutical companies are sponsoring the shows "in part." But this disclosure is missing - and likely WILL be for as long as they use this sales tool.
Michael
It ought to be. Celebrex was one factor in the development of my duodenal ulcer - almost killed me. And it wasn't all that great an arthritic pain reliever for me, either. It beat Aleve, but not by much.
Michael
(spelling corrected) If there IS a mention of this huge monetary backside, it will no doubt be couched in the terms that GOVERNMENT should guarantee this R&D funding. Government, as the Amurrican Pipple know, "has all the money in the world."
Michael
What in the world does this mean? America is the world's richest country. I'll bet we lead the world in spending on a variety things. Will Peter bring things down to a per capita basis for comparison? If so, and we still lead, does than mean we spend too much or other countries spend too little?
Peter doesn't have the neural horsepower to answer the last question.
I would squeeze his head!!
The version I heard:
If I wanted any sh*t from Peter Jennings...
I'd scrape it off Dan Rather's ****!
You are joking about this , right? If you are trying to say it is illegal for a doctor or any medical professional to own stock in medical/pharmaceutical companies, you SERIOUSLY need to do some better research.
Practically every doctor I know (which as a pharma rep is a considerable number) has a significant percentage of their portfolios in these stocks.
If you mean it is UNETHICAL for a physician to prescribe a product simply because he/she owns that company's stock, I agree completely.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.