Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missed Messages (Failure Precursors for 9/11/01 Attacks)
New Yorker (via Drudge Report) ^ | 2002-06-03 (2002-05-27) | SEYMOUR M. HERSH

Posted on 05/27/2002 11:47:41 AM PDT by OKCSubmariner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last
To: rdavis84; fred mertz; sinkspur; okcsubmariner
Yeah, Fred, at least Sinkspur is answering your postings. For some reason he's ignoring what I'm saying about the French book, even though it claims to provide a source.
61 posted on 05/27/2002 7:41:16 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
"It is now clear that the White House, for its own reasons, chose to keep secret the extent of the intelligence that was available before and immediately after September 11th. In addition to the August briefing, there was a prescient memorandum sent in July to F.B.I. headquarters from the Phoenix..."

Always remember...the big-money oil lobby is your friend...

62 posted on 05/27/2002 8:15:15 PM PDT by spanky_mcfarland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
For some reason he's ignoring what I'm saying about the French book, even though it claims to provide a source.

Is this one of those Thierry-Messian-like books, that claims that the US government staged the 9/11 attacks?

63 posted on 05/27/2002 8:17:58 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: BOBTHENAILER
One day we may know the TRUE extent of damage to this wonderful country wreaked by the Clintons and their sycophants. However, I don't think we'll learn it all anytime soon and the worst may be yet to come.

To be homest, I had no idea it was as bad as it turned out to be (9/11). But I shudder to think of what he could have done that's any worse.

The only peace I can muster in thinking of them, is that one day they will answer for the self-serving and the price will be steep.

From your lips to God's ears.

64 posted on 05/27/2002 8:40:16 PM PDT by NYC GOP Chick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur;Howlin;aristeides;OKCSubmariner;Fred Mertz;rdavis84
Whenever I read something that gets me excited, I go Google!

Needless to say , the Bush Family Business $$$$$$ has been searched a lot by me.

The facts of the Carlyle Group,Chevron,Texaco,Unocal,Nimir Petroleum,Delta Oil,Corral Petroleum,Al-Amoudi, Mahfouz, and others unknown are all over the net.

Free Republic Archives are full of articles about Bath and Harken, and yada,yada.

The Boston Herald has quite a few articles regarding the Bush Family and Saudis and businesses that are connected to it.

The info is available for everyone wanting it.

What I cant figure out is why so many Freepers want to deny those connections.

There are real heroes in this sorry mess we are in.

John O'Neill is one, go read about him.

See what he says about not being allowed to go forward because of the Bush-Saudi-Oil interests.

The FBI agent in Minneapolis, and the one in Phoenix are to be commended , and praised.

Who has said nastier things about the Clintons than me?

But he is not President, Sandy Berger is not the National Security Adviser.

The bicmaeral,bipartisan intelligence investigation is going back to 1985.

All of the above people will be examined.

BCCI,Khobar Towers,the Embassys, the Cole,will all be rehashed.I dont like any politician, from any party.

I want less government with less taxes.

I want the truth.

It will come out.

All of the business ties that Americans ,including Republicans,have with the funders of terrorism will be covered 24/7 by our cable news channels.

Bring it on!

65 posted on 05/27/2002 9:21:07 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; aristeides
It's impolite to answer a question with a question.
66 posted on 05/27/2002 9:25:18 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
If you can post an article with specific references to President Bush stopping an investigation quoting named sources (John O'Neill is dead, and he only spoke to a French publication), then I'll be satisfied.

Brit tabloids quoting unnamed sources ain't gonna cut it.

67 posted on 05/27/2002 9:25:25 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: betty jo
<a herf ="http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/690278/posts?page=65></a=test>
68 posted on 05/27/2002 9:28:43 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
well so much for my test!
69 posted on 05/27/2002 9:29:45 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur;aristeides;OKCSubmariner;iwentsouth;infowars;lawdog
The Boston Herald is an American newspaper,not a British one.

Clearly John O'Neills investigative work will be part of the investigation now going on in the House and Senate.

Have you read all ,or any of the articles about John O'Neill?

Do you wonder why the French book is not here in English?

I dont know how to post links, but when I say go google,go google the subject at hand.

Not just American, or right or left wing articles but all the info.

70 posted on 05/27/2002 9:39:09 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/690278/posts?page=65

You are linking to this thread.

71 posted on 05/27/2002 9:45:11 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
I was trying to see if I could do a link,I still dont get it.Anyway,have you read the Boston Herald of Dec 10,2001?

"Saudi Clans Working With US Oil Firms May Be tied To Bin Laden"

72 posted on 05/27/2002 9:53:29 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: aristeides,Senator Pardek,Spar,glorygirl,MizSterious,Uncle Bill,B4Ranch,Betty Jo,Fred Mertz,rdavi
The shills are out in force-they must have had a new White House budget increase because there are more of them now and they act more desperate than ever.

You know, the BBC and the Boston Globe are considered reliable news sources. And the FBI document was identified and O'Neil was likely a source.

The shills whining that the names of the sources are not given proves nothing other than that the shills want desparately for people not to even consider the story. Deep Throat was not named as a source for decades, but he is an FBI agent whose name has just been revealed and he was right. THe Sources for the BBC are FBI agents just like O'Neil and Deep Throat were and these sources are real and are correct in my opinion even if they do not give out their names.

The shills hope that if they repeat their lie long enough that enough people will believe them and ignore the truth. The shills denials do not make their claims true that the BBC and O'Neil cannot be relied on. And I did produce a solid basis for my opinions regardless of what they want to try and pretend.

The allegations by the BBC are also plausible because the connections between GWBush and Saudi campaign donars and business parteners tied to AlQaueda and Hamas go back for two decades.

No amount of subterfuge by the shills can save their boy on this one- the cow is out of the barn no matter how hard the shills try to keep people from considering the facts and a mountain of evidence by their bogus denials.

They, CLinton and GW Bush, both were in bed with the same bad people. This is an extremely well documented fact proven with scores of posts on FR even this year by me, Uncle Bill and many others.

Clinton and Bush were and are still involved with the same terrorist Saudis buisnessmen and government officials, the same Jackson Stephens and the same Mena and BCCI crowd and even the same attorneys Akin and Bump. They both likely have the same shills working for them even now to save their hides. Some of these shills could or may even be being paid for by the Saudis, Jackson Stephens, the Mena and BCCI types to save their reputations as well.

If Bush has learned his lesson and wants now to get out of bed with the bad people he has been around, fine. But we are still entitled to question Bush's judgement and decisions and motives with the Saudis prior to 9/11 that may have made it more difficult for the FBI and CIA to stop the 9/11 attacks.

It used to be Save Our Bill (SOB) with the Clintonista shills.

Now it is Save Our Bush (SOB) with the Bush shills some of whom probably are also shills for Clinton, the Saudis, Stephens, and the Mena and BCCI crowds.

73 posted on 05/27/2002 10:16:38 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Now it is Save Our Bush (SOB) with the Bush shills some of whom probably are also shills for Clinton, the Saudis, Stephens, and the Mena and BCCI crowds.

That shows a lot of class.

74 posted on 05/27/2002 10:18:05 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz,rdavis84,Senator Pardek, Travis McGee, Uncle Bill,Betty Jo,glorygirl,aristeides,Donald
This quote from reply #40 is an absolute falsehood and I believe the author of reply #40 knows it is a falsehood:

"This is the same guy who accused Representative Ernest Istook of "assaulting" his wife ..."

The author of reply #40 is desperately out of control in my opinion.

75 posted on 05/27/2002 10:28:06 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever,Betty Jo,Fred Mertz,glorygirl,MizSterious,B4Ranch,Twodees,Uncle Bill
"Now it is Save Our Bush (SOB) with the Bush shills some of whom probably are also shills for Clinton, the Saudis, Stephens, and the Mena and BCCI crowds." This quote implies that there is an extreme lack of class on the part of the shills who will stoop to new lows to save their jobs and blindly protect their bosses at the expense of the country and the lives of her innocent citizens.
76 posted on 05/27/2002 10:33:47 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
LMAO. Ain't conspiracies fun?
77 posted on 05/27/2002 10:36:36 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn,Travis McGee,Twodees
Please see reply #73. Thanks.
78 posted on 05/27/2002 10:36:42 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Bill,glorygirl,Betty Jo
Shills always try to claim that good, responsible questions about accoutablitly of government officials necessary for a healthy democracratic process are somehow "conspiratorial" (the shills claim this) in order to protect the shill's bosses from having to answer the questions and avoid possible embarassment.
79 posted on 05/27/2002 10:41:38 PM PDT by OKCSubmariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: OKCSubmariner
Shills always try to claim that good, responsible questions about accoutablitly of government officials necessary for a healthy democracratic process are somehow "conspiratorial" (the shills claim this) in order to protect the shill's bosses from having to answer the questions and avoid possible embarassment.

LOL you REALLY like the word Shill don't ya.

80 posted on 05/27/2002 10:43:46 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-137 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson