The Chandra Levy Chronology (Rev. #9)

Various newspapers | May 25, 2002 | NetValue

[crystalk]

It will tell you even more if you knew where CAROLYN Condit was when they took place, or CADEE Condit in a notorious case in San Francisco.

[crystalk]

I show the ice cream shop roughly 31st and Beach, some 2 miles southeast of the body finding place.

[dalebert]

What case in San Francisco? I imagine things were pretty hot after Chandra and Mrs.C spoke on phone. I keep remembering what Cadee said on LK: "Chandra was a big girl and knew what she was getting into".

[callisto]

Tres bien! Excellent chronology!

[mrustow]

And:

Gary Who? Dan Rather on the Public's Right NOT to Know

[Zon]

If Condit is innocent why did his lawyer insist that he take a lie-detector test not approved by the investigating police. Instead, Condit's lawyer arranged for a private source to conduct the lie-detector test. Is the reasoning that Condit was just trying to be helpful? If that is to be believed, do Condit's other actions coincide with the acts of a sincerely helpful person?

Assuming for the moment that Condit wasn't sincerely trying to be helpful, what was the reason or motive for the unapproved lie detector test? To hinder or obstruct the investigation? If he is innocent it is all the more reason to take an approved lie-detector test rather than the unapproved test that would bring additional scrutiny and doubt about his innocence.

BTW, I'm not totally up to speed on this case but I read on another thread wherein one poster said that the skull was separated from the rest of the skeleton. As I understand it they matched the skull's teeth with Chandra's dental records. So it has been proven that the skull is Chandra's. What about the skeleton? That said, a DNA test on the skeleton needs to be compared to Chandra's DNA.

[Bonaparte]

"He could not recall whether they had sex."

But did he recall a pizza?

[Bonaparte]

"...he required no keys, no IDs, no money, and no cell-phone on any girl who went out with him."

Making her completely dependent on him. I wonder where Chandra left her keys to her apartment/apt bldg each time she met with him. When she went home, she had to be able to get in, right?

[Bonaparte]

"...these reporters are not checking into the facts the write."

The days when reporters did their footwork and homework are long since over. Most of them take what they are fed and regurgitate it to the public.

[Katie_Colic]

Thanks for the bump! There are A LOT of people who need to be directed here.

[Howlin]

Here is the link to ALL the WashPost articles on Chandra Levy, since the beginning.

As the Case Progressed

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

Does anyone know where Condit was when the other murders took place?

This is what I really want to know.

I think the D.C. police chief should be fired and put on the parking detail.

[BigBobber]

This is great work. Thank you!

A few comments:

The dates Nov. 23, 2001 and Dec. 13, 2001 should be in 2000, I believe.

When I enter "rock creek park" in Google, nothing comes up about the Klingel Mansion. I wonder what the "home page" is that the police are talking about (see Post #27)?

[Woodstock]

The Dating Rules have been confirmed: no cell phone, no money, no ID, no nothing... for what???? Quick "clean up?" Chandra was playing by Gary's dating rules when she left her apartment. Where is the bracelet Condit gave to Chandra??

[cyncooper]

Good job, Sarah. I was just about post that I distinctly remembered AMS saying she had to have her ID with her because of her job.

[SarahW]

Chandra looked up the location of the Klingle mansion using am internet map site (I don't know which specific one, but a mapquest, Yahoo maps type site)

[Registered]

WAS THE RING FOUND OR NOT?????? Washington Times has one report that it was and then I see others that say it was not! Something's up with that ring!

[Bonaparte]

"Something's up with that ring!"

It's driving me nuts, too. Maybe there are two rings. I can't recall an exact description of the one that was supposedly "found" at the scene.

One thing's for sure, though. Whoever killed her is following all the news accounts and is just as confused as we are! LOL!