Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.
St. Petersburg Times ^ | May 14, 2002 | ROBERT FARLEY

Posted on 05/14/2002 5:05:40 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,0001,001-1,0201,021-1,040 ... 1,141-1,147 next last
Comment #1,001 Removed by Moderator

To: A CA Guy
People liked getting the view for free when they bought the property. No way they didn't know it wasn't part of their property.

Wow, reading some presumption into this article, aren't you? Why do you say there was "no way?" The one really obvious way they could believe it was "protected" if not owned was if there was a developer's agreement describing the lake as "common area," which is a very typical way to develop in Florida. Lake is made when fill is used to level lots, homes are built around lake, developer maintains lake for a period of time then conveys to Property association. The average property owner does not monitor the ownership of the common areas and as long as the developer still has record title, tax notices will be sent to him and not the homeowners. In this case, there was little to protect the homeowners apparently.

A different question is raised on what to do about it. Posters have suggested eminent domain, adverse possession and easement theories, the correctness of which depends largely on one's politics.

Still, it seems unfair to "blame" it on the homeowners without more facts suggesting their culpability.

1,002 posted on 05/14/2002 3:20:41 PM PDT by Boatlawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 972 | View Replies]

Comment #1,003 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
Same to you, buzzard-breath.

I will have you know I have not eaten buzzard in at least 12 days.

So you lie again.

1,004 posted on 05/14/2002 3:21:07 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 999 | View Replies]

Comment #1,005 Removed by Moderator

To: Lazamataz
like a nervous, gambling Chihuahua on methamphetamines.

What does a gambling Chihuahua look like, anyway? (No points for posting a picture of "Dogs Playing Poker.")

1,006 posted on 05/14/2002 3:23:08 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 979 | View Replies]

Comment #1,007 Removed by Moderator

To: wacko
English, not Latin. I'm trusting that you will later in this thread stop doing that.

De duobus malis, minus est semper eligendum. Latin non dolet. Lazamataz? Puri sermonis amator!

1,008 posted on 05/14/2002 3:23:51 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1003 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
The first commandment of all things litigious - thou shalt not be a jerk. A useful corollary is that Equity abhors a c***s***er.

Is the third prong of this doctrine "Equity favors the stupid over the slimy?"

1,009 posted on 05/14/2002 3:24:50 PM PDT by Boatlawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 989 | View Replies]

Comment #1,010 Removed by Moderator

Comment #1,011 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
You got FReepmail.....wow...you guys have a field day with this one haven't ya? I got a feeling one of the more acerbic newbies riding this thread is a "repeat".
1,012 posted on 05/14/2002 3:27:57 PM PDT by wardaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 991 | View Replies]

To: You are here; NittanyLion; one_particular_harbour
"Under the scenario he offered you, would you consider shooting him?"

If it was legal, of course. Since I don't live in Texas...

His scenario was, he would build a structure on his property; specifically, a deck. You just asserted you would shoot someone who was building a deck on his own property. Needless to say, this could never be a legal act, however, the moral failing of such a person -- yourself -- is breathtaking.

That, or you are a simple troll. I'm voting the latter.

1,013 posted on 05/14/2002 3:28:00 PM PDT by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1005 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah,A CA Guy
We should generally favor and encourage innovation, risk-taking, entrepreneurship, and self-sufficiency, but consider how the general welfare is realized when the vast majority sense that justice generally prevails. If the majority strongly believe that something is very wrong, won't a sanction be placed upon it in one form or another?
1,014 posted on 05/14/2002 3:28:18 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 973 | View Replies]

Comment #1,015 Removed by Moderator

Comment #1,016 Removed by Moderator

Comment #1,017 Removed by Moderator

To: You are here
Or are cheap shots your special gift to humanity?

I try to restrict myself to well-deserved shots, but I'm willing to do cheap shots by special request.

1,018 posted on 05/14/2002 3:32:41 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 964 | View Replies]

To: ThinkingMan
You can exploit the rules all you want my friend, but what he is doing is unethical. It flunks "the Golden Rule." He most definately would not wish what he does unto others to be done unto him.

People like this idiot, who has no idea of what ethical behavior is he is so blinded by a buck court having the political process being used to change aspects of exactly what is private property.

If he is an enemy to anyone, he is an enemy to anyone else who owns private property. If I lived there, I would use what I know about the political process to make hime really cry, and to give me the last laugh.

1,019 posted on 05/14/2002 3:32:52 PM PDT by Glutton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Timesink,Lazamataz

"Andale! Deal the cards, Esse."

1,020 posted on 05/14/2002 3:33:03 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1006 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 981-1,0001,001-1,0201,021-1,040 ... 1,141-1,147 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson