Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Faulty foundation of the 14th Amendment
CPI News ^ | May 13, 2002 | Nathan McClintock

Posted on 05/13/2002 6:04:59 PM PDT by NathanM

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last
To: H.Akston
All that is required for a taking, is to deprive you of the property.

I'd have to disagree with that, from a legal standpoint. Taking is not the same as deprivation. The fifth amendment makes the principle very clear by saying, "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Clearly that principle was not violated with the 14th amendment.

121 posted on 05/19/2002 3:17:14 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: inquest
As I understand you, then, you'd like to see the equal protection clause's use restricted to serving as a protection for crime victims. That's an interesting view. Both the Congress and the courts have used it mainly to battle discrimination, particularly racial and ethnic discrimination.
122 posted on 05/19/2002 4:46:15 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: ned
I know it's an unorthodox view, but it's the only one that's consistent with the English language. I admit, I'm kinda weird that way.
123 posted on 05/19/2002 4:56:18 PM PDT by inquest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: ned
Interesting.

Reminds me of the paragraph in :

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38ae1fc86628.htm

Titled: If You Liked the Commerce Power. . .

124 posted on 05/20/2002 6:52:07 PM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ned
"As far as the courts are concerned, any statute that expressly discriminates on the basis of race is presumptively unconstitutional."

Our Lords on the high court better change their opinion about discrimination based on ethnicity real quick, because some real dumb stuff, like fear of profiling, contributed to the FBI's unwillingness to elevate the Phoenix memo and save the World Trade Centers.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/686612/posts (Why we Need Racial Profiling)

125 posted on 05/21/2002 3:33:10 PM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: H.Akston
In times of national crisis, the Supreme Court can get very flexible without even admitting to a change of standards. (See, e.g., Korematsu v. United States (1944) 323 U.S. 214.)
126 posted on 05/21/2002 5:19:46 PM PDT by ned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: ned
I'm afraid to look. That was FDR's packed court era.

That wasn't the case where Hugo Black developed his creative interpretation on how the 14th incorporated the Bill of Rights - but only some, at that, is it?

127 posted on 05/22/2002 4:57:21 PM PDT by H.Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: All
Thanks for everyone's comments. Be sure and read my next column on the 10th Amendment comming soon. Go to Nathan McClintock.com to keep up to date. Nathan McClintock
128 posted on 05/22/2002 6:31:42 PM PDT by NathanM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: NathanM
If you have a ping list please add me to it. I love 10th amendment discussions. Thanks.
129 posted on 05/22/2002 6:34:17 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-129 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson