Posted on 05/13/2002 1:41:59 PM PDT by KantianBurke
Drive then.
Honesty eludes you.
Illegals are criminals, and vilifying criminals is a beautiful thing. The alternative is the defining down of deviancy that the Democrats favor, and we've seen the results of that.
You lack the fortitude to deport, so step aside. Without deportation, we can never seal the border, but with deportation, we create a harsh disincentive to come here.
Deportation is the real answer, but you don't want to face it... Just as the War on Terror was the only solution to that problem. But we never had the national will to pursue it.
We are America, and we can certainly defeat the Illegal Invasion.
If Hillary is voted into office, it will be because Bush screwed his own power base. The next election will be Bush's to lose, and it looks like he's got an early start to doing just that.
Tuor
Is Rove the reason that Karen Hughes is resigning? There were stories last year that Rove was intent at diminishing her influence with GWB.
Looks like he won.
You are half right. We don't regulate immigration and we don't suspend the rights of our citizens at airports.
What unalienable rights do people have at airports?
What do you mean by 'more open'? Do you mean longer? That is obviously true. Do you mean fewer Border Patrol agents per mile? That is probably true, too. Do you mean number of illegals crossing into the country? Then that is false.
Illegals entering our country is a problem in its own right, not merely in relation to the ease with which terrorists can enter the country. But if you want to consider the matter in that light, then realize that we have to start somewhere, and that it is better to take care of the biggest vulnerabilities first. At least we should try to make the terrorists exert themselves a *little bit* when sneaking into the country.
Tuor
Sorry pal it is the individual that votes and it will be the voters fault if Hillary get into office .. just like I blamed the Voters for the 8 yr. nightmare of her husband Administration
Can't seem to find an "Airport Exception" in either the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution.
Aren't we endowed with those inaleinable thingies by our Creator?
He didn't call Bush a murderer. Go ahead, read the original post. I'll wait. Done? Didn't see it, did you. Nice job putting words in his mouth.
However, he did say that if a terrorist attack occurred and it was due to lax immigration policy, then the blood of those killed would be on the hands of the Bush administration *AND* the Congress...which he is a member of. So he himself would have to shoulder some of that blame by his own words.
Tuor
If Tancredo does sound hysterical, it's partly because our borders are still wide open. I think we should all be very concerned about the United States' lack of border security.
If they do, they are not patriots.
He got us to talk about it, didn't he? I'd say he was provoking a dialog, rather than establishing one. Sometimes, though, you have to use phrases like that in order for anyone to take notice. Sad but true.
Tuor
What unalienable rights do we have at airports that we can not exercise?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.