Skip to comments.
EMERSON & THE SECOND AMENDMENT
Fiedor Report On the News #272 ^
| 5-12-02
| Doug Fiedor
Posted on 05/11/2002 10:23:17 AM PDT by forest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-368 next last
To: All
On NOW at RadioFR!
7pm/10pm - The "Banana Republican", our own Luis Gonzalez, has a spirited interview with...none other than JACK THOMPSON!
This is a CALL IN SHOW! Talk to BATMAN JACK THOMPSON!
1-866-RadioFR! (866-723-4637)
Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep!
321
posted on
05/14/2002 7:09:42 PM PDT
by
Bob J
To: Texasforever
However, I will defend your right to try it with me at any time. So have at it.
So...Oh I don't know how about twisting my defense of Tpaines right to "rip" into his fellow posters into "calling him out"?
I think the "So have at it." qualifies as "calling someone out". I don't have to "twist" anything. No lie there.
Do you have a right to "rip" into your fellow posters? You seem to think you do as you do it quite frequently and consistently.
To: Texasforever
However in Texas guns are just tools NOT measure of manhood.
To: Texasforever
Where?
Post 226.
To: philman_36
Once again childish posturing and infantile need to twist words to you own needs.
To: Texasforever
And on another thread, but we'll just stick to this one.
To: Texasforever
Once again childish posturing and infantile need to twist words to you own needs.
No twisting needed. Where have I lied?
And again with the child thing. I'm down to an infant now I see.
You own needs? snicker
To: philman_36
I can also prove who called who out on that too.
To: Texasforever
I can also prove who called who out on that too.
Please, do so.
To: EricOKC
We just need to give em the gun....Hey my friend, I think you know that I'm not a statist, but if you're giving away guns, I've got room for a few more....{;-)
To: philman_36
I will post it on that thread to avoid thread to thread arguments. Look for the post in about 30 seconds.
Comment #332 Removed by Moderator
Comment #333 Removed by Moderator
To: EricOKC
ctually - you attempted to shoot me down. Current FAA regulations prohibit, among other things, firearms from being carried beyond the security checkpoint. There is no exception made for pilots. All you have to do is post the regulation and I will concede the point. The article I posted was a recent article but so far from you all I have is your personal assertion.
Comment #335 Removed by Moderator
To: EricOKC; Texasforever
To: Drammach
I like to think of myself as an histortian. Although teh American army did not use submachineguns in WWI the German army did employ at least one 9mm submachinegun. Off the top of my head I can not give you the name and model but such a weapon was issued to the Kaiser's aqrmed forces. The Thompson gun was an American design in response to the usefulness of this weapon.
Of course at teh time of the NFA enactment US forces in China were issued some of the Thompsons. I can not speak about Marines in Latin Amererica at that time perhaps someone else can. In any case the short barreled shotgun was chosen primarily because the case could be fraudulently argued that it had no military usage as if it had such a usage then it would have been unconstitutional to tax it the way the NFA did.
Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown
To: Roscoe
Roscoe, you choose not to get the point, simply because you are so enamored of the power of the State and can't seem to conceive of people making their OWN choices, for good or bad, and living with the consequences...
HOWEVER, for those who are more misguided than evil, I will respond to your juvenile diatribe...
It is not about doing dope... FYI, my personal drugs of choice are legal already (tobacco and alcohol) and are more lethal in their effect than most of the currently illicit crop, but I am not likely to change up, even after the WOsD is over and its perpetrators jailed or shot. What it's about is the trampling of the BOR done by you drug warriors in the name of doing something that you have no business doing in the first place. Plus the spillover onto the second amendment, which is the thrust of this thread! Your idol, Bush I and his executive orders banning certain weapons based on a spurious and specious "sporting use" criteria.
Roscoe, please go crawl back under your rock and leave folks alone. The lives of others are NOT yours to dispose of and you know it...
338
posted on
05/16/2002 9:15:47 AM PDT
by
dcwusmc
To: dcwusmc
The "right" to smoke crack comes from the BOR?
Nonsense.
339
posted on
05/16/2002 9:38:28 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: harpseal
So, the $10,000 question (actually $60.00 in parts From Bushmaster and a drift punch) is, Could a USSC decision in favor of Emmerson cause the repeal of the NFA?
I've said it before, and I'll say it again, if the Swiss can have full auto, so should I.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320, 321-340, 341-360, 361-368 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson