Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dick Morris Says Hillary Will Be America's Next President (MAJOR BARF ALERT!!!)
NewsMax.com ^ | Wednesday, May 8, 2002 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/08/2002 12:11:53 AM PDT by Capitalist Eric

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last
To: sneakypete
Nom de plummet BUMP! 

To: TomGuy

Her political machine is in high gear. She will run in 2004 (pending political events).

I agree. The biggest indicator of this so far is that her staff is now telling people to not refer to her as Hillary "Rodham" Clinton,but as Hillary Clinton instead. She ALWAYS loses her "Rodham" just before political campaigns,and then finds it again after she wins.

43 posted on 5/8/02 3:03 AM Pacific by sneakypete

And Paul, ever the polite gentleman, has always addressed Hillareeeee! by the conventional southern title "Miss Hillary" (her last name is indefinite. It was 'Rodham', became 'Clinton' after she cost Willie an election, then changed to 'Rodham Clinton', and now has morphed to the inelegant "!" ). --Ole Okie

Nom de plummet: the timeline

hillary rodham: birth (such as it was) thru mock feminism-marriage phase

hillary clinton: loss of governorship phase thru theft of presidency phase

hillary rodham clinton: post-theft-of-presidency phase thru Moynihan-rangel-torricelli senatorial anointment phase

hillary rodham clinton: immediate post-anointment phase thru post-announcement of pre-announcement phase

hillary rodham clinton (aka HILLARY!): post-announcement phase (i.e., post-post-announcement of pre-announcement phase)

hillary rodham clinton: post-withdrawal, post-loss, post-indictment, postnuptial, post-boost (warheads or toadies) -- whichever phase comes first.

(Will no one cry at her final departure?)

it won't s-p-i-n

They ARE space aliens

reckless rodham-clinton-gore reinvention-of-government schemata

KNOWNOTHING VICTIMS RODHAM/CLINTON REVISITED

Q ERTY2 "There isn't a shred of evidence."

HILLARY, YOU KNOW, KnowNothing Victim Q ERTY4 double bagel,

W I D E B O D Y. low-center-of-gravity Dim Bulb, Congenital Bottom Feeder

Q ERTY3 zipper-hoisted

clinton zipper vitiated by obvious spilth

Humpty Dummies

Q ERTY6 utter failure 4th-Estate Malfeasance (DEATH BY MISREPORT)

rodham-clinton reality-check BUMP!


101 posted on 05/08/2002 2:19:51 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Whew, some graphics there!

Despite plastic surgery, Morris doesn't seem to realize just how much uglier Hildebeast will be in 6 years. A'int nobody going to vote for no ugly old woman in the White House.

102 posted on 05/08/2002 2:25:10 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
"Dick, open that round piece of metal, and crawl back into your sewer!"
103 posted on 05/08/2002 2:36:03 PM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Does Dick Morris have some sort of crystal ball or has he signed a deal with the devil? Just because he says she will be the next prez (angels and ministers of grace defend us) does NOT mean she will!!!! I frankly wish her luck. I don't think she stands the chance of a snowball in hell.
104 posted on 05/08/2002 3:31:51 PM PDT by MFSanders
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
It is my belief that Hillary and her machine have calculated that she could win the presidency in 2004 if Bush falters somewhat, and a strong third party candidate ran. Her lackeys in the media would dutifully boost the campaign of McCain as a viable third party candidate at the drop of her broomstick.

Her problem (as she would view it) is to get the nomination. She needs a couple of so-called moderate-conservative Democrats to divide that portion of the primary vote. Trouble is, one or the other would early-on overtake the other in terms of support and or political contributions. That is, unless she had someone run a decoy candidacy whose sole purpose was to syphon support from her rival. I rule out nothing from this bunch.

105 posted on 05/08/2002 3:33:54 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
I agree with Morris. Evidence: the american voters. Clinton 2 terms and Gore the popular vote. No indictments and plenty of weeping women behind her.

Bush is peaking early and it will be difficult for him to sustain it.

I'm thinking she will bail for four years if W is riding high 18 months from now. The most likely scenario is Hildebeast in 2008. I'm hoping Rice will throw in.

106 posted on 05/08/2002 3:38:27 PM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: texlok
If you look at the posts about Bush last summer and look at them this spring, last summer if you posted something you didn't like that Bush was doing, you would be bashed. Now you'll find people agreeing with you.

Yup,a LOT of the people who would flame you for saying ANYTHING the least bit critical of Bubba-2 are now being flamed themselves by the few remaining Bush-Bots.

Gore lost enough votes in Florida, whether due to the Reno/Elian fiasco or not, to a third party candidate, that he lost the election and the presidency.

The truth is that if it hadn't of been for Ralph Nader,Goober WOULD have won the election. Nader did the same thing to Goober in 2000 that Perot did to Bush-1 in 92.

The same could very well happen to Bush.

I plan on not voting in the 2004 presidential election unless the Republicans decide to run a REAL Republican instead of Bubba-2,but I have no doubt there are a lot of people who would vote for any reasonable alternative instead of Bubba-2.I think the Libertarian Party and the Constitutional Party will get enough votes this cycle to surprise a lot of people. I honestly think it's already too late for Bubba-2. He has already burned too many bridges behind him.

107 posted on 05/08/2002 4:06:13 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Dick Morris Says Hillary Will Be America's Next President

God help us.

108 posted on 05/08/2002 4:14:43 PM PDT by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
I plan on not voting in the 2004 presidential election unless the Republicans decide to run a REAL Republican instead of Bubba-2,but I have no doubt there are a lot of people who would vote for any reasonable alternative instead of Bubba-2.I think the Libertarian Party and the Constitutional Party will get enough votes this cycle to surprise a lot of people. I honestly think it's already too late for Bubba-2. He has already burned too many bridges behind him.

I will be voting for a 3rd party Conservative candidate (and not Conservative in name only).

I don't know that it's not too late for Bush, however he would have to reverse himself on quite a few issues, and it's a lot easier to stop something before it's in place (say a police state) than it is to remove it once it's in place.

Bush is rapidly reaching a crossroads I believe. He has to decide what votes are more important - Conservatives, or moderate Democrats ("Reagan Democrats"?). The path he is taking, he is trying to make sure that he's not too different from whatever Democrat is picked to challenge him - and I'm not necessarily faulting him politically - there are probably more moderate Democrats than there are true Conservative/Republicans. If he wants to get re-elected, he is going to have to make up the loss of supporters from Conservatives as a whole, and the only place to do that is in the middle or to the left. We all thought it amusing when he and Gore agreed on so many things. Well, now it's not funny.

109 posted on 05/08/2002 5:38:33 PM PDT by texlok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I am laying down a magnum of the best rat poison I can find...

Wow... What're you like when you're really depressed?

Be well,

110 posted on 05/08/2002 5:55:06 PM PDT by Capitalist Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Hillary's campaign slogan will be: "It takes a Clinton...". This will appeal to all the democrats who will remember "It took a Clinton to win the White House." It can be combined with "It takes a Clinton to get health care." or "...reform social security." or " .... secure peace in the Middle East."

You heard it here first.

111 posted on 05/08/2002 5:55:07 PM PDT by DugwayDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
who could have believed that her sink-and-dress stain of a husband could win two terms as president?

Yeah. No kidding.

When the name Clinton comes up, all I can think about is the corruption and treason associated with this name... Kinda' like "Benedict Arnold," I have a visceral response without any more provocation than simply having the name mentioned.

It's also crucial to remember that they defy the odds (to say the least) at every turn, able to keep from crashing down so often, it makes one wonder whether they hold the key to anti-gravity technology...

Be well, Boris

112 posted on 05/08/2002 6:05:26 PM PDT by Capitalist Eric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Capitalist Eric
Pray hard...Pray very, very hard for God's intervention (now if the rapture comes and all Christians are gone from the earth, then she'll win easily!)
113 posted on 05/09/2002 8:16:08 AM PDT by princess leah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-113 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson