Skip to comments.
U.S. to Renounce Its Role in Pact for World Tribunal
The New York Times ^
| 05/05/2002
| NEIL A. LEWIS
Posted on 05/04/2002 5:56:01 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
1
posted on
05/04/2002 5:56:01 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: Pokey78
international justice
Oxymoron
To: Pokey78
I'm sure there wil be NYT editorial on this in the morning. Russert, et al., will be thoroughly scandalized, as well as Jennings, Blather, Brokaw, yada, yada, yada.
4
posted on
05/04/2002 6:03:24 PM PDT
by
Clara Lou
To: Pokey78;UN_List
Nominally, the ICC is "separate" from the UN, sort of like its bastard child; but I am indexing it for the UN_List anyhow.
To: Pokey78
What can I say? What can I say? Oh...wait a minute, I've got it.
YEA! YEA! YEA!
Why should we give up our precious rights to a fair trial under our Consitution just because those Euroninnies want us to?
6
posted on
05/04/2002 6:06:26 PM PDT
by
kitkat
To: Pokey78
Howdy International Criminal Court, and welcome to History's graveyard. We've got a nice plot for you right next to the League of Nations. Enjoy your stay!
To: Pokey78
This is great news. It helps keep the US free and independent. It also prevents a collection of 3rd world socialist dictators from taxing and controlling us.
8
posted on
05/04/2002 6:10:20 PM PDT
by
MarkM
To: Pokey78
President Bush once again proves that there is a difference between him and Algore. Any supra-national system above the sovereign powers of the US is un-Constitutional. And, our liberties (as of 2002) are still much better than any other UN member.
America can only lose by letting America-haters judge Americans.
Brave, President Bush for this stand.
9
posted on
05/04/2002 6:10:53 PM PDT
by
RobFromGa
To: kitkat
This is the beginning of ending the parasitic drain on American Freedoms. We must continue to end the "death by a thousand cuts" efforts of the EUros, and the other Commie loving nations.
To: Pokey78
If you confer with a GOOD lawyer who UNDERSTANDS the Constitution, you'll find out the Marbury v. Madison decision is NOT what it is portrayed to be. Any law that is in violation of the Constitution is "null and void" without the force of law.
To: madfly
fyi
To: Pokey78
What will the United States government do when the first American citizen is captured, convicted, and jailed by the ICC. Will it go to war or send an armed force to extract him?
13
posted on
05/04/2002 6:22:26 PM PDT
by
jadimov
To: Pokey78, AmriGandu
Palitha Kohona, the chief of the treaty section for the United Nations, said it was unheard of for a nation that signed a treaty to withdraw that signature. Hey! Palitha!
LISTEN UP.
14
posted on
05/04/2002 6:27:02 PM PDT
by
dodger
To: Pokey78
Good news. Bush is very wise to renounce this treaty now, and not wait until the court tries to bring an American citizen into the dock, when it would have looked like special pleading if we backed out.
The Constitution clearly states that treaties are not binding in U.S. law unless they are properly ratified. Moreover, with proper notice to the other parties, even ratified treaties can be abrogated if the U.S. determines that they are contrary to our national interest. Such is the case with the ABM treaty.
15
posted on
05/04/2002 6:29:32 PM PDT
by
Cicero
To: jadimov
What will the United States government do when the first American citizen is captured, convicted, and jailed by the ICC. Will it go to war or send an armed force to extract him? I somehow don't think the world is ready to find out, at least until the next "Clinton" is elected president.
To: Pokey78
President Bush is no NWO globalist, despite all the contrary posts you see here on FR. But he does believe free world trade, which some people get confused thinking he supports a U.N. type world government. This guy is not going to give up U.S. sovereignty.
To: Pokey78
This makes the Kangaroo court's wet dream of indicting Sharon on war crimes a bit dicey. LOL
To: American Soldier
"Howdy International Criminal Court, and welcome to History's graveyard. We've got a nice plot for you right next to the League of Nations. Enjoy your stay!"Now let's add the UN to that graveyard, making the world a much better place.
19
posted on
05/04/2002 6:51:48 PM PDT
by
11B3
To: AmriGandu
I hope that if they renounce it they will still let the internation tribunal indict, convict, imprison/or execute clintoon for his crimes against humanity.
20
posted on
05/04/2002 7:19:12 PM PDT
by
stumpy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-89 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson