Skip to comments.
Study discovers Swedes are less well-off than the poorest Americans
Reuters via Haaretz ^
| 5/4/2002
| Reuters
Posted on 05/04/2002 3:41:42 PM PDT by l33t
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 261-267 next last
To: Tribune7
Well I checked your links, and they seem bona fide. I really am surprised. Perhaps Sweden needs a bit more tough love, and a lot more spankings.
81
posted on
05/04/2002 5:27:27 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: Neanderthal
Norwegians tend to be Republican actually. Check out the voting habits of the heavily Norwegian County of Otter Tail in Minnesota. In any event, Minnesoooota is under going a political transformation. The story is under reported, but it is nevertheless true.
82
posted on
05/04/2002 5:29:47 PM PDT
by
Torie
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: stands2reason
Strange blanket opinion for someone on a conservative forum, which is what this is. You don't seem very conservative to me. We do not tolerate dissent. Shoot them both.
84
posted on
05/04/2002 5:32:09 PM PDT
by
Doe Eyes
To: Torie
I really am surprised. I was too, actually.
85
posted on
05/04/2002 5:32:43 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: abwehr
Now overtime, taxes, health and safety rules will all make it a lot more complicated than this but the idea of having ALL the workers cut back a little to save SOME from being totally unemployed is not without merit. Except that this isn't what happened. It was the stupid California power deregulation scheme writ large. To keep everyone employed, they mandated 35 hour work weeks so that there would be more work to be distributed, raising employment levels. Unfortunately, that reduction in the work week did not translate into matching salary reductions. So they are hemorrhaging cash just as fast, but they are employing more people in the interim. It was a scheme to prop up employment numbers, but they are losing money even faster and eventually the house of cards will collapse and no one will have a job.
86
posted on
05/04/2002 5:33:11 PM PDT
by
tortoise
To: Snickersnee
On the other hand, they gave us the likes of Hubert Humphrey, Walter Mondale, Paul Wellstone.... ...not to mention McGovern and Dasshole...
Hey, my forebears came on a ship from Sweden in 1636, landing in what is now Delaware. But I'm prouder to have two Indian grandmas.
87
posted on
05/04/2002 5:34:37 PM PDT
by
Migraine
To: Neanderthal
South Dakota is not Swedish. It is WASP and German, with 8% Native American, an incredible percentage of the latter of which are alcoholic. It must be the weather or something. North Dakota is the most German state in the US, including a fair number of Volga Germans from well, the Volga region of Russia that Catherine the Great imported there from her favorite country.
88
posted on
05/04/2002 5:34:47 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: abwehr
The US .... rewards its top people with pay levels only a Saudi prince, and a top prince at that, might enjoy. The US does no such thing. The owners of companies voluntarily choose to pay those sums. They may do it foolishly, but its their money, and they are free to do what they want with it.
To: Arioch7
In Europe, they DEMAND that the 35 hour a week worker gets payed the SAME amount as a harder worker. My girlfriend works for a German conglomerate in the US. She gets paid American wages (which for her, is six-figures), but gets European hours (35/week) and European vacation time (5-6 weeks a year, I believe). She has the best of both worlds, and they get bent out of shape if she doesn't take her vacation or works more than 35 hours a week; by her nature she tends to work more of an American schedule. Compared to European companies, American companies are vastly more productive, and it is pretty obvious why (I worked with major French conglomerates for a couple years and got a first hand lesson in bureaucratic inefficiency and being forced to work with only marginally useful employees that would have been axed in this country).
90
posted on
05/04/2002 5:41:41 PM PDT
by
tortoise
To: Torie
Would you mind providing your qualifications for the topic?
To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Are you requesting my cirriculum vitae?
92
posted on
05/04/2002 5:46:16 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: DallasMike
It's fine. I just repainted the garage floor. The wife and kids say hello.
93
posted on
05/04/2002 5:46:53 PM PDT
by
Leisler
To: Torie
But do you have earthquakes?
94
posted on
05/04/2002 5:49:39 PM PDT
by
FITZ
To: FITZ
We most cetainly do. The closest fault line however is in Newport Beach, which is about 20 miles distant. I also purchased a cut rather than a fill lot on the hill just in case.
95
posted on
05/04/2002 5:51:29 PM PDT
by
Torie
To: Doe Eyes
What's your problem? Your sarcasm tricks are wearing a little thin.
To: Torie
I have no problem with crime. I have a gun, know how to use it and a fair amount of free floating anger and would welcome the diversion and relief of double tapping one of Darwins failures. : )
97
posted on
05/04/2002 5:53:18 PM PDT
by
Leisler
To: Torie
What do you mean that the Laffer curve is a fraud? The Laffer curve simply state that at a 0% tax rate the government taxes in 0 taxes. Also, at 100% tax rate, the government takes in 0 taxes because nobody works (on the books, anyway).
I think we would both agree that a 1% tax rate would take in very little, as would a 99% tax rate.
Laffer simply said that somewhere between 0% and 100% is the ideal rate for raising revenue, and that there are points on the curve where you can increase revenue by lowering the rate.
We can argue all we want about where the ideal rate is, but on what basis do you state that the curve itself is a fraud?
To: Rodney King
Laffer was a professor of mine. He was then, and remained, lighter than air. The Curve was hype city. The informational content that 100% tax rates and 0% tax rates do not maximize revenue is simply not very interesting. He also was a big fan of fixed exchange rates, which was rather odd.
99
posted on
05/04/2002 5:56:10 PM PDT
by
Torie
Comment #100 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 261-267 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson