Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PROSECUTORS TO SEEK DEATH PENALTY IN WESTERFIELD CASE
Union Tribune/KFMB ^ | April 25, 2002 | Harry Jones

Posted on 04/25/2002 9:15:24 AM PDT by FresnoDA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 701-718 next last
To: Jaded
I can see parts...but only parts
281 posted on 04/29/2002 4:46:57 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
"You quickly jumped in and many people on FR assumed you were a District Attorney, or had some 'insider' link to the DA in this case, so you seemed to became a STAR for your 15 minutes."

Oh, this is toooooo funny! FresnoDA never said he was a DA. Did you ass-u-me he was one? Shame on you. And shame on you for flaming him for this. Frank Zappa was right about one thing: the only thing more common than hydrogen is stupidity.

282 posted on 04/29/2002 4:48:34 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Another weird situation, the VD's SDPD "Retired Policewoman" friend, was involved from the get go...pictured in the courtroom, and would have been an excellent confidant to have on hand prior to meeting with detectives for testimony review.

This, also, has been bothering me. Especially with the 'lack' of investigation when it came to the VD's and their friends, drugs, parties, to the point of endangering their children.

What kind of link is there between the VD's and (I will go get her name.). I do remember they put her in charge of the DANIELLE RECOVERY CENTER (or Laura Recovery Center as it was first named). Was she a friend of the family? Were there other police affiliated 'friends' of the family ?

283 posted on 04/29/2002 4:48:38 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
You mean she didn't keep dirty laundry in a close hamper? She never threw her dirty clothes on the floor so she could put her pj's on?

Well sometimes kids have favorite underwear ...wanted to wear it tomorrow? If it was not the kid..Dad has to move into the first spot as the lead suspect...How would Westerfield know where to put them in his rush??

284 posted on 04/29/2002 4:49:36 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: spectre
Nothing that happened in that deviant household should surprise anyone. The authorities should be suspecting the Van Dams of foul play as much as anyone else....no, I take that back...more so.

ping))))

285 posted on 04/29/2002 4:52:18 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King

BREAKING NEWS.....Van Dams found to be French in origin, not Dutch as suspected.....

Le Relapse: Libertinism Makes A Comeback in French Clubs
The New York Times | 04/28/2002 | GUY TREBAY
PARIS

A woman called Sylvie — no last name, for reasons that will soon be clear — was talking. "I love to be touched by other men," she said. "It makes him very jealous, but then it makes him very passionate later on."

The masculine pronoun in the preceding sentence belonged to a man called Jean-Charles, same surname as Sylvie. The two are married. They live on the outskirts of Paris. They have been partners, matrimonially and otherwise, for just over 13 years. For the past 18 months Jean-Charles and Sylvie have had a standing date with each other, and also with a changing cast of instantly made new best friends, at a private club in central Paris called Cléopâtre.

They meet there regularly for evenings of what in French is called échangisme, the term for a practice based on seeking sexual gratification with people that, in many cases, one has just met. First, being French, they eat.

On a cool spring evening at Cléopâtre, Jean-Charles and Sylvie sat down to a meal of white asparagus with béarnaise sauce, lobster and a nice bottle of Chablis, then slipped their matrimonial bonds, climbing the carpeted stairs of the club and entering one of a series of chambers where they were to share their affections with a man named Patrick and a woman named Marie, and then a number of other people whose names, at a certain point, it became impossible for this reporter to ascertain.

This all occurred in an atmosphere whose velvet hush and civilized air of decorum was broken, inevitably, sometime after midnight by an opera of primal grunts and sighs.

"Our philosophy has always been sexual freedom, free from restrictions, free from shame," said Hervé Béhal, the owner of Cléopâtre, which opened in 1978 and eventually evolved into a haven for swingers. "Women, as much as men, want to indulge all their senses and still feel respected. Here, a woman loses no respect if she decides to have sex with four different men."

Whether or not this is so, it seems pretty clear that, as Sylvie said, "the good thing about the échangiste scene is that people come to these places knowing what they want." What is that? "To have fun," she said, "and to make some love."

Paradoxical as it seems, at a moment when an extreme right-wing politician, Jean-Marie Le Pen, can garner nearly 17 percent of the vote in the early balloting for the French presidency, and when the clichés about the conservativeness of French cultural life can easily strike a foreigner as apt, Paris is enjoying a wave of libertinism that makes New York look as though it were being run by the elders of Salem.

Statistics are not easy to come by. And visitors are in little danger of mistaking contemporary Paris for San Francisco during the Summer of Love. But it is increasingly clear that activities that once seemed the concern of a small sexual fringe have made inroads into the French mainstream, with both the French press and government health officials remarking the arrival of France's new class of libertines.

"There has been a tremendous increase in the number of commercial venues for all these activities," both in Paris and throughout the country, said Yves Souteyrand, head of the office for social science and public health at the French National Agency for AIDS Research, referring to the back-room sex now said to be common in straight and gay clubs throughout the capital.

"It is a big phenomenon right now," added Carine Roitfeld, the editor of French Vogue, whose March issue featured a story on the rise in échangisme that deemed it more "a la mode" than ayurvedic massage or aromatherapy.

"It is very, very fashionable for some reason," Ms. Roitfeld said.

More than 250 heterosexual échangiste clubs currently operate in France, according to the editors of Couples, which bills itself as "le magazine des échangistes." Nearly 50 restaurants, clubs and saunas in Paris openly cater to heterosexual adventurers. In addition, 35 gay bars and clubs operate so-called back rooms, in nearly all of the city's 20 arrondissements, according to Jean-François Chassagne, the president of S.N.E.G., a trade group for gay businesses in France. "When I moved to Paris in 1983, there might have been five back rooms," said the novelist Edmund White, whose 2001 book-length essay, "The Flâneur," neatly diagrams three centuries of French sexual laissez-faire.

Compared to the licentious antics at most échangiste clubs and back-room gay bars in Paris, New York's current chasteness seems eons away from its steamy pre-AIDS incarnation, when Plato's Retreat was so fashionable it rated a cover story in New York magazine, and when gay sexual adventurers made obligatory pilgrimages to such grotty local fleshpots as the Anvil or the Mine Shaft, where patrons were expected to check their clothes at the door.

Like any worthwhile movement, the new French libertinism has its designated journals (Purple Sexe, Couples and the English language Deliciae Vitae), its documentarians and its bards. The novelist Michel Houellebecq's 1998 novel, "The Elementary Particles," sold more than 300,000 copies in France, less, perhaps, on the merits of its deadpan prose than on its obsessive depictions of group and anonymous sex. "La Vie Sexuelle de Catherine M.," a memoir by Catherine Millet, a feminist critic and editor, rocketed to the top of the sales charts last year on the strength of the author's sexual résumé, a flatly depicted chart of acts performed in parks and clubs, in automobiles and underpasses, and in serial human combinations that might have exhausted even de Sade.

Guillaume Dustan, too, was transported from small-press obscurity to cultural lightning rod when a mainstream public got hold of his novels "Dans Ma Chambre" and "LXiR," which uninhibitedly celebrate frenzied, anonymous and potentially lethal sex. Mr. Dustan is now a controversial regular on French talk shows — largely, complains Didier Lestrade, a founder of Act Up-Paris, "on the basis of this big concept that, after 20 years of AIDS, the only thing we French have left is our freedom, so we can do whatever we want."

Far from being clandestinely situated, a majority of Paris's sex clubs — Chris & Manu, Yacht Club, L'Abys, to name three of the more popular straight ones — are as frankly self-proclaiming as theme restaurants. Some, like Cléopâtre, are theme restaurants, offering, for a $50 cover, dinner service and a clothing boutique as a supplement to the prime attraction, which is sex.

"Basically, my wife and I come because it is good for the relationship," Jean-Luc, a Cléopâtre regular, said recently. "When you play outside the customary roles, you see your partner in a different way, and you can combat the inevitable boredom of marriage."

As for Jean-Luc's wife, Sybille, échangisme is, she said, "something more interesting than the movies" to do on a Saturday night.

Movie theater receipts are not getting help from the gay clubs of Paris, either. The city's back-room bars have become, said Têtu, France's largest gay and lesbian magazine, the new supermarkets of sex. "Back-room sex has become the French gay national sport," Alexandre Frédéric, a filmmaker, claimed not long ago in an interview in a sex zine.

Using a hidden camera and infrared film, Mr. Frédéric made a documentary, "Night Shot Paris," in the back rooms of Paris's thriving gay sex clubs, places like Le Mec Zone, Les Docks and the notorious Dépôt, a bar that has become, Mr. Frédéric asserted, the second stop on many hip tourist itineraries, after Colette.

By contrast, a sex-club scene that once thrived in New York now survives mostly clandestinely, despite, as Sandra Mullin, a spokeswoman for the City Health Department, explained, "the strict state sanitary codes" forbidding its existence.

In France, back rooms operate legally, flourishing under the accepting gaze of a system whose Gaullist puritanism eased when, in 1981, François Mitterrand's Socialist government was voted into power and the police stopped prosecuting homosexual acts.

Among the apparent results of two decades of liberalization was the election last year of Bertrand Delanoë as the first openly gay mayor of Paris and the recent booming success of places like Le Dépôt.

This 15,000-square-foot establishment looms over the Rue aux Ours, a side street that is five minutes' walk from the Pompidou Center. During the past year, according to Mr. Chassagne of S.N.E.G., the gay-business trade group, the number of patrons for Le Dépôt has reached 20,000 a month.

An $8 door charge at Le Dépôt buys patrons a drink ticket, a condom and admission to a multilevel establishment with a clothes check, a vast dance floor and an underground labyrinth with walls of cinder block and camouflage mesh curtains draped across cubicles where strangers engage in activities that would not have been out of place in Fellini's "Satyricon."

"Why do I come here?" a glazier named Hassan said on a recent night at Le Dépôt. "You can meet anyone here, from any class — it's not an issue if someone is a bourgeois or from the suburbs."

When Jean-Christian Bourcart, a documentary photographer, began taking the pictures that became "Forbidden City," a 1999 book exploring the échangiste scene, then still new, the heterosexual swingers he caught on a camera hidden inside a jacket pocket were "definitely from the suburbs or the countryside," he said. As the scene grew, Mr. Bourcart said, the range of participants seemed to shift, and the échangiste landscape began to draw "more of the elite, more fashionable-looking people," making it, he said, "more impressive as a phenomenon in terms of scale and meanings, sociologically."

Those meanings are perplexing, but the one that most concerns French social scientists has been termed "le relapse," a coinage created by the French press after epidemiologists observed a spike in rates of gonorrhea and syphilis following the introduction, in 1996, of life-extending AIDS drugs.

Even decades into the AIDS pandemic, France still has no system for the reporting of new cases of H.I.V. infection, and statistics on the disease tend to be "estimations," said Marie-Christine Simon, the spokeswoman for the National Agency for AIDS Research. "We don't have the incidence of new cases," she said. "We have only indirect measurements that show there will probably be an increase in new H.I.V. infections, based on the number of new syphilis cases we have seen."

Reports show that syphilis has been making a comeback in France. "People get syphilis if they don't use condoms," Mrs. Simon said. And people who don't use condoms are at higher risk for H.I.V.

"The fact is that, after the treatment revolution in antiviral therapy, people in France felt different about their sexual prospects," said Christophe Martet, a writer for Têtu, the gay and lesbian magazine.

"In the 1980's," when AIDS first appeared in France, Mr. Martet said, "gay people, certainly, began to take measures to limit their sexual activities, the number of partners, and to have less sex."

But soon after the new therapies appeared, he added, France's young people, both homosexual and heterosexual, began to act as if AIDS were over.

"The data that exist anticipate an increase in less preventive behavior" in all populations, especially the young, said Mr. Souteyrand of the National Agency for AIDS Research. "The heterosexual population is somewhat less exposed than the gay population, but with so many heterosexuals practicing échangisme, to be frank, we can't tell where the disease will go."

People are "fed up" with prevention and with the social and moral confinements of safe sex, Mr. Souteyrand said. Or, as Jean-Charles, at Cléopâtre, put it: "Americans worry too much about these things. You have to live freely, to live for the moment, because, let's face it, sooner or later everyone is going to die."

 

286 posted on 04/29/2002 4:52:40 PM PDT by FresnoDA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
I have lackeys? I don't recall hiring any lackeys. I don't think my job description permits me to hire lackeys. I think you're mistaken--were you perhaps talking about your relationship to Kim? FresnoDA, in any event, is not employed as a lackey. Oh. Wait. I get it. You're trying to figure out just what his real job is. I assure you. It's not "lackey."
287 posted on 04/29/2002 4:52:53 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

To: demsux
3 of you? Ashcrofts? LOL

We need a little levity here. What we need is and official NOTE TO SELF LIST to entertain ourselves until next week.

288 posted on 04/29/2002 4:53:37 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage
Or as implied in another forum...a smoking video tape. Wait, I'm locking in a visual...gotta go poke out my mind's eye. Hang on...

Okay, I'm back. There is also some speculation about dog hairs being talked about during the trial. Gimme a break, I have cat hair at work, and don't take my cats with me. I don't know about the rest of you, but all of a sudden, I'm very concious of the amount of DNA I leave lying around. Those long tresses....

289 posted on 04/29/2002 4:57:40 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

To: demsux,Spectre,MizSterious,FresnoDA
Ok, so I'm you, you're me, and Kim is both of us.

I hate to ruin their pre-conceptions, but it is kind of funny watching one of that trio jump to conclusions and the other two follow.

Spectre, MizSterious, FresnoDA.. I don't know where you got this idea from, but go look at my home page and 'actually' read it.

I was in Cub Scouts, Boy Scouts, achieved the rank of EAGLE SCOUT, with GOD and COUNTRY award. I was at the top of my class in grade school, junior high, high school. I have a degree in Computer Science, and I AM NOT FEMALE. So, please, quit calling me Babs, or other nicknames like it.

Funny, because I have a well rounded education, excellent composition and grammatical skills, and don't rite on mi kumputor lik im from arkansaw, you assume I am female !!?!?!L>!<>!You crack me up !!!!!!!

290 posted on 04/29/2002 4:59:29 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
"You seem to be asserting that the stain is more than just urine."

I asserted nothing. Please re-read my posts. You're really becoming irritating.

291 posted on 04/29/2002 5:01:34 PM PDT by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 275 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2; Doc Savage; Jaded
The Blood DNA was only a match to Brenda or her offspring...it even could be Brenda's (MitDNA).

It's questionable if the panties were previously worn or just stained, IMO only.

Doc and Jaded, what the two of you are saying is just plain good common sense, and not very difficult to comprehend, if someone wants to open their mind.

I want some evidence DW was even in the house...just a trace will do. Anyone?

sw

292 posted on 04/29/2002 5:03:21 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 279 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
A. That the stain from the carpet and the stain from the jacket were of a similar source or highly likely from the same source as the source of the DNA on the inside crotch area of the underwear. I also determined that those three items could also be the result of a biological offspring of Brenda Van Dam and Damon Van Dam.

Do you think is is possible that the DNA was NOT a perfect match (as this guy hedged) and that could be that there was some of daddys DNA there mixed with some of hers??

293 posted on 04/29/2002 5:05:27 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Whoops! Mea Culpa about the female! I honestly thought you were, honestly.

But then, I'm from Arkansas...so what did you expect?!

sw

294 posted on 04/29/2002 5:05:41 PM PDT by spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Here's my question though, if it was stated that those were the last known clothes that she wore, who knew it? If her father was the one to identify what the last thing she wore was, WHY would he know? She's 7 she could dress herself. My daughter always wore and still does underwear under her pj's. So was Danielle wearing them under the pj's after she bathed or before? If before, why would only the panties be in the drawer, where are the rest of the clothes she had on that day? The implication is that these were removed by the perp and dumped in the drawer. What's up with that? Who was it?

I think you are trying to read too much into this.

Put yourself in the place of the police officer searching Danielle's room for evidence. You are searching through her room, dresser drawers would be a place you would search. You find an obviously recently worn pair of underwear. You think this because usually underwear in a drawer is CLEAN. This pair has yellowish stains. You don't know what the stains are, but you know (from experience) that these should be taken and examined. You don't know what purpose they might serve (perhaps it is evidence of semen, perhaps not), but your job it to take anything that MIGHT PROVE SOMETHING.

The underwear is taken into police custody, and swab samples are taken from which DNA testing is done. This becomes necessary because YOU HAVEN'T FOUND HER BODY YET. You have found blood spots in Westerfield's motorhome, and in the Van Dam house, and outside, so you need SOMETHING POSITIVELY from Danielle to compare with.

Hope this helps.

295 posted on 04/29/2002 5:06:31 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA;UCANSEE2
Have we now determined that the VD's still have their PR team in place:>)
296 posted on 04/29/2002 5:06:53 PM PDT by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
The problem I have with that theory is that it seems to say that the sexual assault took place in Danielle's bedroom. This is very nearly impossible, with the information we have, which then leads me to wonder where the underwear came from.

The initial reports I heard were that the underwear was found lying in the corner of the room--again implying that the sexual assault took place in Danielle's room. I haven't yet had the time to read through all of the posts on this forum, so I don't know if this has already been hashed and rehashed.

It is difficult enough to believe that DW was able to enter the house undetected, steal Danielle from her room, and exit the house undetected with two other children and the father nearby. Adding the notion that DW also sexually assaulted her--well, it just makes it pertnear impossible IMHO.

297 posted on 04/29/2002 5:08:42 PM PDT by FriarTom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 276 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
3 of you? Ashcrofts? LOL

Don't forget "Kit" Bond...a loyal conservative (one of the few in the senate)

298 posted on 04/29/2002 5:09:41 PM PDT by demsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
I don't think that it has ever been clearly stated how many markers were matched. If it were only 6 it could still be Bren's DNA in the RV. It is my understanding that there would be other testing for more markers, I could be wrong though. But when they threw out the "the DNA matches and the chances were...." it is lies, damn lies, and statistics. They throw in total population number and distort the findings for RATINGS!!! IMO.
299 posted on 04/29/2002 5:09:57 PM PDT by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 293 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
I think you should get the award for the MOST OBVIOUS STATEMENT of this case. I am not making fun of you. I am saying this is the biggest BLATANT fact of the case, and one that is pretty much being ignored, it would seem, by the police and the DA.

The statement:
DAMON VAN DAM: He was the last person to have seen her alive.......

At least, that we know of.

300 posted on 04/29/2002 5:10:03 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 273 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 261-280281-300301-320 ... 701-718 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson