JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT

Judicial Watch ^ | April 18, 2002

[Howlin]

especially if you do not give money to them.

Oh, but I did. All of us did. You'll figure it out some day.

BTW, you've successfully avoided my questions.

Let's forget about your dad and Larry Klayman.

Just provide me with ONE non-profit organization that only spends 4 percent of their "take" on their stated purpose.

[Howlin]

So what does Klayman spend the other 96% of the money on? Does anyone know?

Nobody will ever say.

[Amelia]

Just provide me with ONE non-profit organization that only spends 4 percent of their "take" on their stated purpose.

Rainbow-PUSH maybe??

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

It is not fair to take one instance out of the many TV appearances that Klayman has given, and just say that he does not represent JW well. That is misleading.

It isn't the slightest bit misleading.

If a man can't keep himself from behaving like a ten year-old for fifteen minutes on national television - all the while knowing that a vast audience is watching - why am I to believe that such a display is limited to one television appearance?

I think he's a BOZO.

[Howlin]

We'll never know, I guess; they aren't being audited either. :-)

[humbletheFiend]

I think you are correct in that assumption. But 'eww' likes to fling the ethics thing around so imo he should be out front in all his dealings so as to ensure he is occupying as ethical position as possible. He has a group with a BOD made up of three employees and one other. They are voting on the use of tax deductible contributions for their own salary, trips, cruises, etc. He needs to be up front about these things as ethics is more than laws or rules, imo. If he is truly doing great things then the contributors will continue to support him even knowing all the facts... JMO

Well, I won't be surprised if they find some personal privileges being taken and similar abuses. That's really pretty common with all organizations that are composed of human beings.

But I'll be surprised if they find anything really flagrantly illegal. Everyone involved had to know from day one that there would be some scrutiny down the road.

I think that a lot of the people who support what they see the organization as doing will overlook any minor, human indiscretions. It's kind of expected, I think.

[Amelia]

I think that a lot of the people who support what they see the organization as doing will overlook any minor, human indiscretions.

What, exactly, has Judicial Watch ever actually accomplished?

[deport]

So what does Klayman spend the other 96% of the money on? Does anyone know?

Looks like the IRS is about to find out maybe.....

But you can get some info here..... .. Not in real detail

In 2000 the 'eww' had expenses of $21,261,717 of which $13,297,454 (62.5%) went to fundraising activities .....

[FreedominJesusChrist]

What does your question have to do with the current topic: JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT?

You are the one being subversive.

[humbletheFiend]

What, exactly, has Judicial Watch ever actually accomplished?

Well, I can't give you chapter and verse and I'm not the best choice of someone to be blowing his horn for him, but I'm been to its website and know that it lists numerous achievements. In the last analysis, it must be remembered that no one would be contributing if they saw no results and we wouldn't be talking about him if the Government didn't see him as some sort of player.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"I think he's a BOZO." And that is somehow higher and mightier of an argument. LoL!

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

And that is somehow higher and mightier of an argument. LoL!

Actually, my post was longer than that. Nice to see you zero right in on the point.

[deport]

eww does personal injury now.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

LOL! And the hits just keep on comin'...

Thanks.

[Howlin]

I've been trying to get that one question answered for months. None of Klayman's supporters will ever answer it. But they want US to be upset because Klayman's being audited?

I can almost guarantee you those numbers made his return pop out.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

"Nice to see you zero right in on the point."

No problem, that was the main point in your whole argument, you know.

[FreedominJesusChrist]

What question is that again?

[Howlin]

Aren't you cute.

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

No problem, that was the main point in your whole argument, you know.

LOL! I'm supposed to base my opinion of Larry Klayman NOT on how he presents himself to the public, but on what? Your opinion of him? LOL!