Skip to comments.
'Intelligent Design Creationism and Its Critics': Supernatural Selection
The New York Times ^
| 14 April 2002
| JIM HOLT
Posted on 04/14/2002 12:31:25 AM PDT by sourcery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-297 next last
To: jennyp
Don't bother me. I'm yelling back at the screen!LOL!
221
posted on
04/15/2002 6:08:27 PM PDT
by
Gumlegs
To: jennyp
Cloaked & lurking ...
To: BMCDA
Mein Deutsch is nicht gut genüg! I'd like to read the English sometime.
To: jennyp
There's a slight problem with the senescence model and that is that past reproductive years, mortality drops off as age increases.
To: jennyp
Dank für das komplette und lesbare website. Offensichtlich sollte jeder auf FreeRepublic es lesen. Machen sie oberkorper frei! (I used that on german women when I was there.)
225
posted on
04/15/2002 8:08:55 PM PDT
by
Gladwin
To: Jeff Gordon
Occum's Razor doesn't hold a candle to the Kobiachi Maru. (Just kidding....humor.)
226
posted on
04/15/2002 8:59:48 PM PDT
by
xzins
To: Jeff Gordon
That'a Occam's Razor from Willam of Occam (or Ockham). He liked it so much, he bought the company.
Actually it shaves slowly but it shaves exceedling close.
To: RobbyS
Most people seem not to have risen to the level of Aristotelean physics.
To: jennyp;VadeRetro;Nebullis;PatrickHenry
It's quite comprehensive indeed but unfortunately it's completely in German and I don't know if the author has any plans to translate it to English.
I found this site some time ago while doing a search on evolution, Popper and Chalmers. I was quite surprised that there was a German website dealing with Creationism since I was convinced that this was only an issue in America (and to some lesser degree in Australia). Most Europeans don't even know that there is such a controversy over this topic in the US, so I was even more baffled when I found a French (or was it Belgian?) website dealing with Creationism (but somehow I lost the bookmark, merde!).
229
posted on
04/15/2002 9:32:20 PM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: VadeRetro
Mein Deutsch is nicht gut genüg! Ja aber babelfishdeutscher ist viel besser :-)
230
posted on
04/15/2002 9:36:12 PM PDT
by
jennyp
To: Nebullis
There's a slight problem with the senescence model and that is that past reproductive years, mortality drops off as age increases.Really? It holds across many species? How exactly do you define "mortality" in this case?
231
posted on
04/15/2002 9:37:52 PM PDT
by
jennyp
To: BMCDA
It looks like a great site. A cursory glance revealed some good topics, canalization, developmental constraints...
Bedankt, hoor!
To: jennyp
How exactly do you define "mortality" in this case?That's a good question. Mortality rates level off at older ages. The speed slows down. Mutations accumulate over a lifetime, but, apparently the expectation of mortality based on rates of deleterious effects, both from mutations and from active genes causing rapid senescence, slow down at some point far beyond reproductive age.
To: Nebullis
Niets te danken ;-D
234
posted on
04/15/2002 10:26:09 PM PDT
by
BMCDA
To: Doctor Stochastic
Most people seem not to have risen to the level of Aristotelean physics. Including many "scientists"?
235
posted on
04/15/2002 11:15:36 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: BMCDA
merde!). Watch your language: this is a family thread! :-)
236
posted on
04/15/2002 11:19:04 PM PDT
by
RobbyS
To: F16Fighter
If you care to check out this particular book, which also delves into the scientific, spiritual and historical dynamics of UFOs, Ghosts, Drugs (coincidently), critiques of Christian sects and their ties to the "occult", and other goodies, the book is called 'Occult Invasion'. You actually have me interested and I may get it. The drugs/religion connection is well known though. That's how a lot of people "saw god."
For example, I read recently that researchers found that the Oracle of Delphi, which in a religious context gave out supernatural advice, worked on gas. There was a fault line running right under the temple that was releasing Ethylene gas, which caused the trances and delirium in the priestesses.
I suppose there's a rather mundane explanation such as this for most religious phenomena.
237
posted on
04/16/2002 1:12:23 AM PDT
by
Quila
To: Junior
I've been waiting for Fiat jokes. "Fix It Again Tony"
238
posted on
04/16/2002 1:13:21 AM PDT
by
Quila
To: xzins
Intelligent design is not creationism. Such is only a tie that's made by those who have an anti-intelligent design agenda. You keep telling yourself that, but many of us have been watching the progression. It seems largely influenced by the fact that they can't force obvious religious doctrine into public schools (creationism), so the new tact is to wrap a scientific cloak around it to get it in.
In either case, the main point is to displace science (evolution) in the science classes with religion (creationism) by other than competition on an equal scientific level.
239
posted on
04/16/2002 1:17:03 AM PDT
by
Quila
To: F16Fighter
Interesting take on Hunt by Aufill, who certainly has his dander up about Hunt's inferences that Catholics surrender "devotions, novenas, feasts", and I suppose the incense, candles, and Marial and saint worship as well and does in fact tie in all the evidence. I'm even more interested. I've always known that much of Christianity, and especially Catholicism, is taken from local pagan practices (in the Catholic's case, it was just plain good marketing). Hunt lays it out pretty well?
240
posted on
04/16/2002 1:20:07 AM PDT
by
Quila
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-297 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson