Posted on 04/09/2002 3:44:15 PM PDT by knighthawk
El Moumni wasn't allowed to be an imam no longer in Morocco, because of his fundamentalist nature. He was asked to become an imam here in the Netherlands in Rotterdam, the city of wich 43% of the citizens are immigrants. Nice people live there:
Suspects in Rotterdam had videotapes Bin Laden (Holland)
Also he said that all homosexuals should be killed. His comments were 'apologized' by an islamic scholar who said he didn't mean it this way: what he ment to say was homosexuals should be killed only when law permits it! (Think Saudi Arabia)
This is the way it goes here. If the islamaniacs call out for hate, death and violence, it's freedom of religion (so they at least admit islam is not a religion of peace and tolerance) it's okay. (Remember Salman Rushdie?)
The muslims are alway able to get away with things like this. Where are the socialists/human rights activists/liberals who condemn people like Pim Fortuyn (calling him a nazi and comparing him to people like Eichmann while Fortuyn is a big Israel supporter!) but are silent now?
If people want on or off this list, please let me know.
Exactly. It's the politically correct religion of peace (TM). If a Christian would have said those things?
And the Dutch court figured he'd get beat up and mugged by some angry Afghanis, since so many of them are bone smugglers. After the fall of the Taliban, the Afghanis have to catch up for all the butt pirating that they missed out on during the Taliban rule.
a barrage of words from the PC-brigade, national condemnment in the media, a place on the rascist internet page, you name it!
Let's build a new religion, call it anti-jihad and maybe we can say it then. Who I am kidding, of course not, the PC-brigade would allow no one to insult their cuddly toys!
Muslim science. Oh well, let's send Rosie O'Donald and Barney Frank over to sneeze on him.
By the way, were the remarks provoked by Pim Fortuyn's growing political success?
Go Pim Fortuyn!
Gadaffi: Our New Friend (Really!?)
Here's one from 10/24:
Define terrorism, urges Gaddafi
Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi has entered the debate on terrorism - telling a TV interviewer that the US might just as well bomb London if it is serious about fighting terrorism."If the United States wants seriously to eradicate terrorism, the first capital that should be pounded with cruise missiles is London," Colonel Gaddafi said on the Arabic satellite news channel al-Jazeera.
"It is the shelter of terrorism," he added, referring to charges that Islamic militants suspected of violence are protected by Britain's policies on political asylum.
And here's an interesting analysis of Gaddafi's future:
BTW, is that the book that talks about the 6+2 threats against the Taliban regime before 9/11?
So only clerics have freedom of religion in the Netherlands, or are there other protected groups as well? Do they also recognise something called "freedom of speech," or is that just an American thing?
I'm inferring that the poster has nothing against "hate speech" laws; there we part company. But I'm not Dutch, so I'll leave them to the mercy of their democratic institutions. At least certain persons are allowed to say certain things at certain times: that's enough "democracy" for most anyone, right?
Yes, the very same book.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.